Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T04:16:37.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preferred Orientation Analysis in Textured Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

H.J. Bunge
H.J. Bunge*
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Metallurgy Technical University of Clausthal FRG
Get access

Abstract

Polycrystalline materials may either be compact such as metals, ceramics, or some polymers or they may be powder samples. In both cases preferred orientation of the crystallites must be taken into account. In compact materials, texture formation by solid state processes and the texture-property relationship are the main purposes for texture investigations. In powder diffraction, texture correction can increase the accuracy of the results. Also strongly textured samples may be used in order to seperate diffraction peaks which are coincident in random powders.

Type
V. Texture Analysis by XRD
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 35 , Issue A: First Pacific-International Congress on X-ray Analytical Methods (PICXAM). Fortieth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 7-16, 1991 , 1991 , pp. 263 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Schwarzer, R.A., Measurement of local textures with transmission and scanning electron microscopes. Textures and Micro structures 13 15:30 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Wassermann, G. and Grewen, J., “Texturen metallischer Werkstoffe,” Springer Verlag, Berlin (1962)Google Scholar
3. Williams, R.O., Trans. AIME 242 104 (1968)Google Scholar
4. Ruer, D. and Baro, R., Adv. x-ray Anal. 20 187 (1977)Google Scholar
5. Bunge, H.J., Z. Metallkunde 56 872 (1965)Google Scholar
6. Roe, R.J., J. Appl. Phys. 36 2024 (1965)Google Scholar
7. Matthies, S., Phys. Stat. Sol. 92 K.135 (1979)Google Scholar
8. Imhof, J., Z. Metallkunde 68 38 (1977)Google Scholar
9. Matthies, S. and Vinel, W.G., Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 112 K. 111 (1982)Google Scholar
10. Bunge, H.J., “Texture analysis in materials science.” Butterworths Publ. London (1982)Google Scholar
11. Bunge, H.J., Three-dimensional texture analysis. International Materials Review 32 265:291 (1987)Google Scholar
12. Bunge, H.J. and Esling, C., J. Phys. Letter. 40 627 (1979)Google Scholar
13. Dahms, M. and Bunge, H.J., The iterative series expansion method for quantitative texture analysis. J. Appl. Cryst. 22 439:447 (1989)Google Scholar
14. Bunge, H.J., Klein, H., E. Dahlem-Klein, and Park, N.J., Program System ODF-Analysis. Textures and Microstructures (to be published)Google Scholar
15. Bunge, H.J., Advantages of neutron diffraction in texture analysis. Textures and Microstructures 10 265:307 (1989)Google Scholar
16. Bunge, H.J., Dahms, M. and Brokmeier, H.G., The determination of integrated intensities from polycrystalline samples with preferred orientation. Crystallographys Reviews 2 67:87 (1989)Google Scholar
17. Park, N.J. and Bunge, H. J., Z. Metallkunde 81 636 (1990)Google Scholar
18. Böcker, A. Brokmeier, H.G. and Bunge, H.J., J. Europ. Ceramic Soc. in printGoogle Scholar
19. Klein, H., Waibel, B., Martin, M. and Bunge, H.J., in “Joining Ceramic, Glass and Metal.” 285, DGM Informationsgesellschaft, Oberursel (1989)Google Scholar
20. Bunge, H.J., Proceedings ICOTOM-9 Textures and Microstructures (in print)Google Scholar