Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T21:13:38.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Direct Lift Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

W.J. G. Pinsker*
Affiliation:
RAE, Bedford

Extract

Control of flight is essentially control of lift. When one proposes—as we shall do here—to tamper with one of the most fundamental principles of aircraft control, it is evident that this may have far reaching repercussions and that such a venture cannot therefore be undertaken lightly. The elevator has been the primary longitudinal control since the earliest pioneering days and has served the aircraft well from its modest beginnings to this age of supersonic flight. Why do we want to change and what do we want to take its place; how will the pilot react to an altogether novel way of controlling the aeroplane? These are the questions one is bound to ask when direct lift control is suggested as an alternative and these are the questions which we shall attempt to answer here.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1970 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Pinsker, W. J. G. The landing flare of large transport aircraft. RAE Technical Report 67297 (ARC R & M 3602) 1969.Google Scholar
2. Pinsker, W. J. G. The performance and control characteristics of aircraft employing direct lift control. RAE Technical Report 68140 (ARC 30835 R & M 3629) 1970.Google Scholar
3. Smith, L. R., Prillman, F. W. and Slingerland, R. D. Direct lift control as a landing approach aid. AIAA Paper No. 66-14, January 1966.Google Scholar
4. Stickle, J. W., Patton, J. M. and Henry, R. C.Flight tests of a direct lift control system during approach and landing. NASA Technical NoteD-4854. November 1968.Google Scholar
5. Janson, G. R. Flight evaluation of direct lift control on the DC-8 Super 63. SETP Tech Review Vol 9, No 2, pp 117127, September1968.Google Scholar
6. Rolls, L. S., Cook, A. M. and Innis, R. C. Flight- determined aerodynamicpropertiesof a jet-augmented auxiliary flaps/direct lift control system, including correlation with wind tunnel results. NASA TN D-5128, May 1969.Google Scholar
7. Aoyagi, K., Dickinson, S. O. and Soderman, P. T.Investigations of a 0-3-scale jet transport model having a jet-augmented boundary layer control flap with direct-lift control capability. NASA TN D-5129.Google Scholar
8.Boeing-80 project andstaff engineering detailed design and installation of a DLC flap for the Boeing 367-80 airplane. NASA CR 73292, 1969.Google Scholar
9. Taylor, C. R. Jr. Flight results of a trailing edge flap designed for a direct lift control. NASA CR-1426, October 1969.Google Scholar
10. Chase, T. W., Falkner, V. L. and Helfinstine, R. F. Study of simulation programme to investigate the mechanisation of an aircraft flieht control system that employs direct lift control. AFFDL-TR-68-69. January 1968.Google Scholar
11. Lee, J. A. and Johannes, R. P. LAMS B-52 flight experiments in direct lift control. SAE paper 690406, Amil 1969.Google Scholar
12. Lorenzetti, R. C. and Nelsen, G. L. Direct lift control for the LAMS B-52. AFFDL-TR-134, October 1968.Google Scholar