Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T05:38:05.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Survivability of helicopter with individual blade primary control failure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

R. Ganguli ,
B. Jehnert ,
J. Wolfram  and
P. Voersmann
R. Ganguli
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
B. Jehnert
Affiliation:
Institut für Luft und Raumfahrtsysteme, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany
J. Wolfram
Affiliation:
Institut für Luft und Raumfahrtsysteme, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany
P. Voersmann
Affiliation:
Institut für Luft und Raumfahrtsysteme, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of actuator damage on a helicopter rotor with an IBC based primary control system is studied. Such a system eliminates the swashplate and can be accomplished by trailing-edge flaps, active twist or full authority IBC, especially with smart material actuators. Damage to the collective, longitudinal and lateral cyclic are simulated for one blade, both individually and in combinations ranging from partial damage to complete failure. Numerical results are obtained using a dissimilar blade aeroelastic analysis based on finite elements in space and time for hover and forward speed conditions. It is found that the helicopter can be trimmed for all cases with all three controls having failed on the blade with actuator damage thereby showing that the IBC actuated rotor can survive an actuator failure and can be reconfigured by the pilot using the controls on the other blades. However, in case the collective fails and the longitudinal cyclic is present, there are problems in achieving trim at high damage levels at high forward speeds. Physical explanations of this phenomenon are given. The response (especially flap) for the damaged rotor blades can become high and 1/rev and 2/rev are transmitted by the reconfigured rotor to the hub. Results show that IBC based primary controls provide redundancy which can improve the survivability of a helicopter in case of actuator failure in one blade.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 111 , Issue 1124 , October 2007 , pp. 645 - 657
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2007 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ganguli, R., Jehnert, B., Wolfram, J. and Voersmann, P.. Optimal location of centre of gravity for swashplateless helicopter UAV and MAV, Aerospace Engineering and Aircraft Technology, 2007, 79, (4), pp 335–345.Google Scholar
2. Nitzsche, F. and Breitbach, E.J.. Using adaptive structures to attenuate rotary wing aeroelastic response, J Aircr, September-October 1994, 31, (5), pp 1178–1188.Google Scholar
3. Anusonti-Inthra, P., Gandhi, F. and Miller, L.. Reduction of helicopter vibration through cyclic control of variable orifice dampers, Aeronaut J, November 2003, 107, (1077), pp 657–672.Google Scholar
4. Straub, F.K., Kennedy, D.K., Domzalski, D.B., Hassan, A.A., Ngo, H., Anand, V. and Birchette, T.. Smart material-actuated rotor Technology – SMART, J Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, April 2004, 15, (4), pp 249–260.Google Scholar
5. Afagh, F. F., Nitzsche, F. and Morozova, N.. Dynamic modelling and stability of hingeless helicopter blades with a smart spring, Aeronaut J, July 2004, 108, (1085), pp 369–377.Google Scholar
6. Gennaretti, M., Poloni, L. and Nitzsche, F.. Smart spring identification for hovering rotor aeroelastic stability augmentation, Aeronaut J, May 2003, 107, (1071), pp 233–240.Google Scholar
7. Done, G.T.S.. Past and future progress in fixed and rotary wing aeroelasticity, Aeronaut J, August-September 1996, 100, (997), pp 269–279.Google Scholar
8. Chopra, I.. Review of state of smart structures and integrated systems, AIAA J, November 2002, 40, (11), pp 2145–2187.Google Scholar
9. Shen, J. and Chopra, I.. A parametric design study for a swashplateless helicopter rotor with trailing-edge flaps, J American Helicopter Society, January 2004, 49, (1), pp 43–53.Google Scholar
10. Shen, J. and Chopra, I.. Swashplateless helicopter rotor with trailing-edge flaps for flight and vibration control, J Aircr, March-April 2006, 43, (2), pp 346–352.Google Scholar
11. Kim, J. and Koratkar, N.A.. Feasibility study to develop a Mach-scaled swashplateless rotor model, Smart Materials and Structures, February 2005, 14, (1), pp 79–86.Google Scholar
12. Neuheuser, T. and Carl, U.. Assessment of power consumption of helicopter flight control systems without swashplate, Conference on Recent Advances in Aerospace Actuation Systems and Components, November 2004, Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
13. Arnold, U.T.P., Furst, D., Neuheuser, T. and Bartels, R.. Development of an integrated electrical swashplateless primary and individual blade control system, 32nd European Rotorcraft Forum, September 2006, Maastricht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
14. Arnold, U.T.P. and Furst, D.. Closed loop results from CH-53G flight tests, Aerospace Science and Technology, July 2005, 9, (5), pp 421–435.Google Scholar
15. Sirohi, J. and Chopra, I.. Design and development of a high pumping frequency piezoelectric-hydraulic hybrid actuator, J Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, March 2003, 14, (3), pp 135–147.Google Scholar
16. Sirohi, J., Cadou, C. and Chopra, I.. Investigation of the dynamic characteristics of a piezohydraulic actuator, J Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, June 2005, 16, (6), pp 135–147.Google Scholar
17. Friedmann, P.P., Carman, G.P. and Millott, T.A.. Magnetostrictively actuated control flaps for vibration reduction in helicopter rotors-design considerations for implementation, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, May-June 2001, 33, (10-11), pp 1203–1217.Google Scholar
18. Thakkar, D. and Ganguli, R.. Use of single crystal and soft piezoce-ramics for alleviation of flow separation induced vibration in smart helicopter rotor, Smart Materials and Structures, April 2006, 15, (2), pp 331–341.Google Scholar
19. Thakkar, D. and Ganguli, R.. Single crystal piezoceramic actuation for dynamic stall suppression, Sensors and Actuators A- Physical, March 2006, 128, (1), pp 151–157.Google Scholar
20. Hess, R., Siwakosit, W. and Chung, J.. Accommodating a class of actuator failures in flight control systems, J Guidance Control and Dynamics, May-June 2000, 23, (3), pp 412–419.Google Scholar
21. Grabill, P. and Keller, J.A.. Vibration monitoring techniques investigated for the monitoring of a CH-47D swashplate bearing, 59th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Phoenix, Arizona, USA, 6-8 May 2003.Google Scholar
22. Taneja, N. and Wiegmann, D.A.. Analysis of injuries among pilots killed in fatal helicopter accidents, Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, April 2003, 74, (4), pp 337–341.Google Scholar
23. Krebs, M.B., Li, G.H. and Baker, S.P.. Factors related to pilot survival in helicopter commuter air taxi crashes, Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, February 1995, 66, (2), pp 99–103.Google Scholar
24. Gibbard, S.R. and Reid, L.D.. An investigation of primary control failure in a piloted helicopter, J American Helicopter Society, April 1996, 41, (2), pp 37–43.Google Scholar
25. Heiges, M.W.. Reconfigurable controls for rotorcraft – A feasibility study, J American Helicopter Society, July 1997, 42, (3), pp 254–263.Google Scholar
26. Huang, C.Y., Celi, R. and Shih, I.C.. Reconfigurable flight control systems for a tandem rotor helicopter, J American Helicopter Society, January 1999, 44, (1), pp 50–62.Google Scholar
27. Celi, R.. Stabilization of Helicopter blades with severed pitch links using trailing-edge flaps, J Guidance Control and Dynamics, July-August 2003, 26, (4), pp 585–592.Google Scholar
28. Enns, R. and Si, J.. Helicopter flight control reconfiguration for main rotor actuator failures, J Guidance Control and Dynamics, July-August 2003, 26, (4), pp 572–584.Google Scholar
29. Gandhi, F. and Sekula, M.K.. Helicopter horizontal tail incidence control to reduce rotor cyclic pitch and blade flapping, Proceeding of the 60th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 7-10 June, 2004.Google Scholar
30. Ganguli, R.. Health monitoring of a helicopter rotor in forward flight using fuzzy logic, AIAA J, December 2002, 40, (1), pp 2373–2382.Google Scholar
31. Hodges, D.H. and Dowell, E.H., Nonlinear equation of motion for elastic bending and torsion of twisted nonuniform blades, 1974, NASA TND-7818.Google Scholar
32. Viswamurthy, S. and Ganguli, R.. An optimization approach to vibration reduction in helicopter rotors with multiple trailing-edge flaps, Aerospace Science and Technology, April 2004, 8, (3), pp 185–194.Google Scholar
33. Ganguli, R.. Optimum design of a helicopter rotor for low vibration using aeroelastic analysis and response surface methods, J Sound and Vibration, November 2002, 258, (2), pp 440–447.Google Scholar
34. Bir, G. and Chopra, I., University of Maryland Advanced Rotorcraft Code (UMARC) Theory Manual, August 1992, UM-AERO Report 92-02.Google Scholar
35. Roget, B. and Chopra, I.. Individual blade control methodology for a rotor with dissimilar blades, J American Helicopter Society, July 2003, 48, (3), pp 176–185.Google Scholar
36. Gandhi, F. and Malovrh, B.. Influence of balanced rotor anisotropy on helicopter aeroemechanical stability, AIAA J, October 1999, 37, (10), pp 1152–1160.Google Scholar
37. Ganguli, R., Chopra, I. and Haas, D.J.. Simulation of helicopter rotor system structural damage, blade mistracking, friction and freeplay, J Aircr, July-August 1998, 35, (4), pp 591–597.Google Scholar
38. Ganguli, R.. A Survey of recent developments in rotorcraft design optimization, J Aircr, 2004, 41, (3), pp 493–510.Google Scholar
39. Fillppone, A.. Prediction of aerodynamic forces on a helicopter fuselage, Aeronaut J, 2007, 111, (1117), pp 175–184.Google Scholar
40. Bhat, S.R. and Ganguli, R.. Validation of comprehensive helicopter aeroelastic analysis with experimental data, Defence Science J, 2004, 54, (4), pp 419–427.Google Scholar
41. Manimala, B.J., Walker, D.J., Padfield, G.D., Voskuijl, M. and Gubbels, A.W.. Rotorcraft simulation modelling and validation for control law design, Aeronaut J, 2007, 111, (1116), pp 77–88.Google Scholar