Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T10:36:16.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deadlier than the male? Women, knowledge and power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Joanna Lewis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Africa , Volume 68 , Issue 2 , April 1998 , pp. 284 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Vinay, Bahl, 1997. ‘Cultural imperialism and women's movements: thinking globally’, Gender and History 9 (1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Karen, Beckwith. 1996. ‘Lancashire women against pit closures: women's standing in a men's movement’, Signs (summer), 1034–68.Google Scholar
Virginia, Bond. 1997. ‘Between a rock and a hard place: applied anthropology and AIDS research on a commercial farm in Zambia’, Health Transition Review 3 (7), 69–83.Google Scholar
Lisa, Brock. 1996. ‘Questioning the diaspora: hegemony, black intellectuals and doing international history from below’, Issue 24 (2), 9–13.Google Scholar
Helen, Calloway. 1993. ‘Purity and exotica in legitimating the empire: cultural construction of gender, sexuality and race’, in Ranger, T. O. and Vaughan, Olufemi (eds), Legitimacy and the State in Twentieth Century Africa, pp. 31–61. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Daunton, M. J. 1995. Progress and Poverty: an economic and social history of Britain, 1700–1850. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katherine, Fierlbeck. 1995. ‘Getting representation right for women in development: accountability and the articulation of women's interests’, IDS Bulletin 26 (3), 11–22.Google Scholar
Gisela, Geisler. 1995. ‘Troubled sisterhood: women and politics in southern Africa’, African Affairs 94 (377), 545–78.Google Scholar
Marie, Goetz Ann. 1994. ‘From feminist knowledge to data for development: the bureaucratic management of information on women and development’, IDS Bulletin 25 (2), 27–36.Google Scholar
Keith, Hart. 1997. ‘New Social Forms for the Knowledge Industry: a personal report from Cambridge’. Paper read to the Centre d'étude d'Afrique noir, Bordeaux, November.Google Scholar
Bell, Hooks, with Tanya, McKinnon. 1996. ‘Sisterhood: beyond public and private’, Signs 21 (4), 814–29.Google Scholar
Bessie, House-Midamba. 1993. ‘The legal basis of gender inequality in Kenya’, African Journal of International and Comparative Law 5 (4), 850–68.Google Scholar
David, Iyam. 1996. ‘“Full” men and “powerful” women: the reconstruction of gender status among the Biase of southeastern Nigeria’, Canadian Journal of African Studies 30 (3), 387–408.Google Scholar
Cecile, Jackson. 1996. ‘Rescuing gender from the poverty trap’, World Development 24 (3), 489–504.Google Scholar
Rudyard, Kipling. 1993. Selected Poems, ed. Keating, Peter. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Giles, Mohan. 1997. ‘Developing differences: poststructuralism and political economy in contemporary development studies’, Review of African Political Economy 73, 311–28.Google Scholar
Nelson, Barbara J., and Najma, Chowdhury. 1994. Women and Politics Worldwide. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lisa, Pohlmann. 1995. ‘The experiences of women in institutions: leadership, power and representation’, IDS Bulletin 26 (3), 117–24.Google Scholar
Lance, Taylor. 1997. Editorial, ‘The revival of the liberal creed: the IMF and the World Bank in a globalized economy’, World Development 25 (2), 145–52.Google Scholar
White, Sarah C. 1997. ‘Men, masculinities and the politics of development’, Gender and Development 5 (2), 14–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed