Skip to main content

Comparison of taste quality between organically and conventionally grown fruits and vegetables

  • Dov Basker (a1)

Panels of 40 to 60 “non-expert” consumers attempted to distinguish between the taste of organically and conventionally grown fruits and vegetables. Wherever possible, samples of the two types of produce were obtained by picking them in the growing orchards/fields to avoid any question of authenticity, and cold-stored without treatment under the same conditions, for periods reflecting their shipping time to markets. Some physical, chemical, and instrumental analytical tests were also performed. No consistent preference pattern emerged. For grapefruit, grapes, carrots, spinach, sweet corn and tomatoes, the differences in hedonic ratings and scores between the two types of produce were not significant. For mangoes and orange juice, the conventional type was preferred, while the reverse was true for bananas; in each of these three instances the result could be ascribed to fruit being tasted closer to its optimum maturity.

Screening tests were performed to detect any traces, at the parts-per-billion level, of chlorinated hydrocarbons and organophosphorus compounds used as pesticides, or their degradation products. No traces were detected in any of the samples examined (bananas, grapes, carrots, spinach, sweet corn or tomatoes), whether organically or conventionally grown. In those samples examined (bananas, grapes, carrots, spinach, sweet corn and tomatoes) by quantitative tests for the three major fertilizer elements used conventionally (NPK), nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations were not consistently greater, while potassium concentrations were either equal or greater, than in the organically grown samples. Among the anion analyses performed on orange juice, grapefruit juice, carrots, spinach and tomatoes, nitrates and particularly nitrites either were not detected, or occurred at negligible concentrations in all samples. Phosphates were found at higher concentrations, but not significantly so, in four of the five organic products tested; no phosphates were detected in either type of tomatoes.

Hide All
1.American Society for Testing and Materials. 1968. Manual on Sensory Testing Methods. Committee E-18 on Sensory Evaluation of Materials and Products. ASTM Special Technical Publ. 434. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
2.Amerine M.A., Pangborn R.M., and Roessler E.B.. 1965. Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
3.Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1970. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 11th ed. (W. Horwitz, ed). Washington, D.C. para. 47.012, pp. 931932; para. 47.008, pp. 918–923.
4.Basker D. 1973. Indirect method for determination of insoluble solids in processed vegetable products. J. Assoc. Official Analytical Chemists 56:1508.
5.Basker D. 1981. Nonparametric comparison of samples by taste panels: Limits of difference detectable and establishment of nondifference. J. Food Quality 5:16.
6.Basker D. 1988a. Assessor selection: Procedures and results. In Moskowitz H.R. (ed). Applied Sensory Analysis of Foods (2 vols). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. Vol. 1, pp. 125143.
7.Basker D. 1988b. Critical values of differences among rank sums for multiple comparisons. Food Technology 42:7984.
8.Basker D. 1988c. Critical values of differences among rank sums for multiple comparisons by small taste panels. Food Technology 42:8889.
9.Basker D. 1989. A useful hedonic “Smiley” scale. J. Testing and Evaluation 17:307309.
10.Beharrell B., and MacFie J.H.. 1991. Consumer attitudes to organic foods. British Food J. 93(2):2530.
11.Breimer T. 1982. Environmental Factors and Cultural Measures Affecting the Nitrate Content of Spinach. Nijhoff M. (ed). W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, Netherlands.
12.British Standards Institution. 1980. Methods for Sensory Analysis of Food. Part 1: Introduction and General Guide. British Standard 5929. London.
13.Brugger D., Schaumann D., and Grosch D.. 1987. Landbau—Alternativ und Konventionell. Auswertungs- und Informationsdienst für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forste e.V., Bonn, Germany.
14.Cheema O.S., and Dani P.G.. 1934. Report on export of mango to Europe in 1931–32. Bulletin 170. Dept. of Agric., Bombay, India.
15.Duncan D.B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11:142.
16.Gore W.L. 1952. Statistical Methods. Interscience, New York, N.Y.
17.Helm E., and Trolle B.. 1946. Selection of a taste panel. Wallerstein Lab. Commun. 9:181194.
18.Jennings W.G. 1977. Objective measurements of flavor quality: General approaches, problems, pitfalls and accomplishments. In R.A. Scanlan (ed). Flavor Quality: Objective Measurement. ACS Symposium Series 51, (San Francisco, California, September 1976). Amer. Chemical Soc., Washington, DC. pp. 110.
19.Lapushner D., Frankel R., Fuchs Y., Basker D., and Edelman H.. 1981. Tomato fresh market fruit quality from a once-over harvest of nor and rin hybrid arrays: Considerations for mechanical harvest production. Genetics and Breeding of Tomato. Proc. Meet. Eucarpia Tomato Working Group, Avignon, France, pp. 153160.
20.McMahon B.M., and Sawyer E.D. (eds). 1986. Pesticide Analytical Manual. Vol. 1: Methods which detect multiple residues. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C. Sec. 212.26, 232.4 including Table 1–201 appended thereto, 232.42.
21.Minotti P.L. 1975. Plant nutrition and vegetable crop quality. HortScience 10:5456.
22.Moskowitz H.R. (ed). 1988. Applied Sensory Analysis of Foods (2 vols). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
23.National Academy of Sciences. Committee on Nitrite and Alternative Curing Agents in Food. 1981. The Health Effects of Nitrate, Nitrite and N-nitroso Compounds. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
24.Pearson E.S., and Hartley H.O.. 1972. Biometrika Tables for Statisticians. Vol. 2. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England.
25.Reganold J.P., Papendick R.I., and Parr J.F.. 1990. Sustainable agriculture. Scientific American 262(6):112120.
26.Schuster B.E., and Lee K.. 1987. Nitrate and nitrite methods of analysis in raw carrots, processed carrots, and in selected vegetables and grain products. J. Food Sci. 52:16321636, 1641.
27.Siegel S. 1956. Nonparametric Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y. pp. 104111, 127136.
28.Sokal R.R., and Rohlf F.J.. 1981. Biometry. 2nd ed.W.H. Freeman, New York, N.Y.
29.Solms J., Booth D.A., Pangborn R.M., and Raunhardt O. (eds). 1987. Food Acceptance and Nutrition. Academic Press, London, England.
30.Srivastani H.C. 1967. Grading, storage and marketing. In Kurup C.G. Raghava (ed). The Mango: A Handbook. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, pp. 99149.
31.von Loesecke H.W. 1950. Bananas. Interscience, New York, N.Y. Insert between pp. 108109, p. 68.
32.von Sydow E. 1975. Flavour—a problem for the consumer or for the food producer? Proc. Royal Soc. (London) B. 191:145153.
33.Woodward W.W., and Schucany W.R.. 1977. Combination of a preference pattern with the triangle taste test. Biometrics, 33:3139.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Journal of Alternative Agriculture
  • ISSN: 0889-1893
  • EISSN: 1478-5498
  • URL: /core/journals/american-journal-of-alternative-agriculture
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 40 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 672 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.