Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T09:36:41.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diggs v. Shultz. 470 F.2d 461

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Alona E. Evans
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 67 , Issue 3 , July 1973 , pp. 547 - 548
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Dec. 16, 1966, UN Doc. S/RES/232; reaffirmed by Security Council Res. 253, May 29, 1968.

2 “Sec. 10. Notwithstanding any other provision of law . . . the President may not prohibit or regulate the importation into the United States of any material determined to be strategic and critical pursuant to the provisions of this Act, if such material is the product of any foreign country or area not listed as a Communist-dominated country or area . . . for so long as the importation into the United States of material of that land which is the product of such Communist-dominated countries or areas is not prohibited by any provision of law.” 50 U.S.C. §98–98h-1. Quoted by court. (Footnotes by court omitted.)

3 470 F.2d 461, 466–67.