Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T02:35:27.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Friendly Relations and Co-Operation Among States: Debate at the Twentieth General Assembly, United Nations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Edward McWhinney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Comments
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 60 , Issue 2 , April 1966 , pp. 356 - 361
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1966 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 E . MeWhinney, “The ‘New’ Countries and the ‘New’ International Law: the United Nations’ Special Conference on Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States,” 60 A.J.I.L. 1 (1966); and see also L. T. Lee, “ T h e Mexico City Conference of the United Nations Special Committee on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States,” 14 Int. and Comp. Law Q. 1296 (1965).

2 U.N. Doc. A/5746, Nov. 16, 1964.

3 Res. 1966 (XVIII), Dec. 16, 1963.

4 See Consideration of Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations. Observance by Member States of the Principles relating to the Sovereignty of States, their Territorial Integrity, Non-interference in their Domestic Affairs, the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes and the Condemnation of Subversive Activities. Report of the Sixth Committee, U.N. Doc. A/6165, Dec. 18, 1965.

5 Ibid. 27.

6 Ibid. 30.

7 Ibid. 33.

8 Ibid.

9 Res. 1815 (XVII), Dec. 18, 1962; and see 60 A.J.I.L. 1, at 5 (1966).

10 Res. 1966 (XVIII), Dec. 16, 1963; and see 60 A.J.I.L. 1, at 6 (1966).

11 60 A.J.I.L. 1, at 29, note 114 (1966).

12 U.N. Doc. A/6165, Dec. 18, 1965, pp. 34-35.

13 60 A.J.I.L. 1, at 15-16 (1966).

14 See Statement by Dr. Vratislav Peehota, Czechoslovak representative in the Sixth Committee, Nov. 8, 1965 (Czechoslovak Permanent Mission to the United Nations, New York).

15 See, for example, Dean Acheson, in 1963 Proceedings, American Society of International Law 13, 14.

16 For a somewhat different approach to the same problem, from the viewpoint of Continental European legal thinking, See F.Münch, “Brauch und Missbrauch der normativen Kraft des Faktischen,” 15 Jahrbuch der Albertus-Universität zu Königsberg/ Pr. 29 (1965); idem (book review), 25 Zeitsehrift fur ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 142 (1965).

17 See Statement by “William P. Rogers, U. 8. representative in the Sixth Committee, Nov. 17, 1965 (U.S. Delegation to the United Nations, Press Release 4706, Nov. 17, 1965).

18 60 A.J.I.L. 1, at 15-16 (1966).

19 See note, “Regional Meetings of the Society,” Joint Conference, Toronto, Canada, p. 379 below.

20 U.N. Doc. A/6165, Dec. 18, 1965, p. 23.

21 Ibid. 23-24.

22 Ibid. 24-25.

23 Ibid. 26-27.