Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T04:10:20.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Law: A Personal View. By Albert A. Ehrenzweig. Edited by Max Knight. Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff, 1977. Pp. xviii, 163. Bibliography. Index of Names.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Julius Stone*
Affiliation:
University of California Hastings College of Law

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Reviewed in 68 AJIL 145 (1974).

2 Ehrenzweig seems finally to adopt my positions on this, including the choice of the term “apex norm.” See his discussion on pp. 37-45, especially p. 38. Compare Stone, Legal System and Lawyers’ Reasonings, 104-05, 123-31 (1964); id. Mystery and Mystique in the Basic Norm, 27 Modern L.R. 34-50 (1963).

3 Stone, Legal System, supra note 2, at 128.

4 It also goes far to reconcile my positions with it. See citations, supra n. 2.

5 P. 144. Implied in the word “science,” of course, is Ehrenzweig's faith in the powers of psychoanalysis, which many may not share. Even understood in a looser sense, however, this final sentence of the ultissima verba is an extraordinary reversal of the roles of law and justice in “the pure theory of law.“