Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T17:22:25.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of the Systems D1S80, D17S30, ApoB, TC11, VWA, and SE33 for Zygosity Determination - Letter to the Editor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

H.-G. Scheil  and
W. Huckenbeck
H.-G. Scheil*
Affiliation:
Institute of Human Genetics and Anthropology
W. Huckenbeck
Affiliation:
Institute of Legal Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
*
Institute of Human Genetics and Anthropology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Universitätsstaße 1, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The usefulness of PCR systems (D1S80, D17S30, ApoB, TC11, VWA, and SE33) is discussed. The statistical evaluation shows that these systems – together with other systems – are well suited for zygosity testing.

Keywords

Zygosity testing in twinsSystems D1S80D17S30ApoBTC11VWA and SE33
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , April 1995 , pp. 135 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1995

References

REFERENCES

1.Emery, AEH (1976): Methodology in medical genetics. Edinburgh, London & New York: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
2.Eufinger, H, Rand, SP, Schütte, U (1995): Use of single- and multi-locus and polymerase chain reaction systems for zygosity determination - clinical application in twins with clefts of the lip and palate. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 44: 25–30.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Huckenbeck, W, Scheil, H-G, Stancu, V, Bonte, W (1996): VNTR locus D1S80: Allele frequencies and genotype distribution in the region of Düsseldorf. Anthrop Anz 54: in press.Google Scholar
4.Huckenbeck, W, Scheil, H-G, West, S, Kanja, J, Bonte, W (1996): Northrhine Westphalian data on the HumTHO1 locus. Anthrop Anz 54: in press.Google Scholar
5.Huckenbeck, W, Scheil, H-G, West, S, Demir, K, Kanja, J, Kaiser, A, Hees, V, Meyer, W, Schölten, D, Stancu, V, Bronczek, M, Bonte, W (1996): German data on the PCR based loci Hum VWA31, HumTHO1, HumFES/FPS, HumF13B and D1S80. Adv Forens Haemogenet 6: in press.Google Scholar
6.Maynard Smith, S, Penrose, LS (1955): Monozygotic and dizygotic twin diagnosis. Ann Hum Genet 19: 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Ooki, S, Yamada, K, Asaka, A (1993): Zygosity diagnosis of twins by questionnaire for twins' mothers. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 42: 17–22.Google Scholar
8.Pascal, O, Levayer, T, Aubert, D, Peneau, A, Markey, P, Moisan, JP (1994): French population data of 6 AMPFL's. Adv Forens Haemogenet 5: 542–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Scheil, H-G, Koppatz, K (1991): Tabellen zur Eiigkeitsdiagnose bei Zwillingen anhand hämogenetischer Polymorphismen. Anthrop Anz 49: 161–175.Google Scholar
10.Schwartz, DWM, Jungl, EM, Krenek, OR, Mayr, WR (1994): Typing for STR-loci by electrophoresis on rehydratable Polyacrylamide gels: phenotype and allele frequencies of SE33 and TC11 in an Austrian population sample. Adv Forens Haemogenet 5: 581–583.Google Scholar
11.Torgersen, S (1979): The determination of twin zygosity by means of a mailed questionnaire. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 28: 225–236.Google Scholar