Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 December 2013
Since the detailed study by Edith Porada of the cylinder seals and small objects from the celebrated treasure found in the temple of Mont at Tôd in Upper Egypt, questions concerning its origin and date still remain unanswered. Porada suggested that in addition to seals from Eastern Iran and possibly Afghanistan, a North Syrian origin for two of the cylinders seems a distinct possibility. Two other cylinder seals were carved in Mesopotamian style, one of them being datable to the period of the Third Dynasty of Ur. She also showed conclusively that there are no cylinders which can be dated later than 1800 B.C. (Middle Chronology) and that the latest cylinders belonged to the Isin-Larsa period. Her conclusions concerning the origin of the treasure and the importance of parallels for the amulets and other small objects with material from Mari and Ebla are entirely convincing. A recent study by Christine Lilyquist stresses the evidence for a date within the reign of Amenemhet II for the deposition of the treasure which was found in four metal boxes inscribed with the king's name. While in studies concerning the 153 silver vessels Cretan and Mycenaean prototypes have been cited, Anatolia has not received so much attention. Here it will be suggested that there is considerable recently published evidence from Anatolia and Syria which is relevant to the Tôd silver cups, and that a consideration of recently published textual material from Mari, Ebla, Rimah and Brak may also be useful.
1 Porada, E., “Remarks on the Tôd treasure in Egypt”, in Societies and Languages of the Ancient Near East: Studies in Honor of I. M. Diakonoff eds. Dandamayev, M. A. et al. (Warminster, 1982), 285–303Google Scholar.
2 Lilyquist, Christine, “Granulations and glass: chronological and stylistic investigations at selected sites, ca. 2500–1400 B.C.” in BASOR 290291 (1993), 29–94Google Scholar. Schemes for the date of Amenemhet II (traditional date 1929–1892 B.C.) may now differ by about 20 years (information from J. Malek). Lilyquist prefers Kitchen's date, 1901–1866. See also Schachermeyr, F., Ägäis und Orient 4 (1967), 57Google Scholar; Matthäus, H. “Die Bronzegefässe der Kretisch-Mykenischen Kultur” in Prähistorische Bronzefunde Abt. II.1 (Munich, 1980) 249 ffGoogle Scholar.
3 de la Roque, F. Bisson, Trésor de Tôd (Catalogue Générale des Antiquités Égyptiennes du Musée du Caire Nos. 70501–754Google Scholar; de la Roque, F. Bisson, Contenau, G., Chapouthier, F., Le trésor de Tôd, Documents de Fouilles de l'Institut Français d'Arch. Orientale du Caire, XI (1953Google Scholar); Vandier, J., “À propos d'un dépôt de provenance asiatique trouvé à Tôd”, Syria 18, 174 ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Matthews, D. and Eidem, J., “Tell Brak and Nagar”, Iraq LV (1993), 204Google Scholar.
5 Maran, Joseph, “Die Silbergefässe von et-Tôd und die Schachtgräberzeit auf dem griechischen Festland”, PZ 62 (1987) 221–7Google Scholar; Laffineur, R., “Réflections sur le trésor de Tôd”, Aegeum 2 (1988), 17–30Google Scholar, and “Material and craftsmanship in the Mycenae shaft graves”, Minos NS XXV–XXVI (1990–1991), 245–95Google Scholar. See also Hood, S., The Arts in Prehistoric Greece (Harmondsworth, 1978), 153–66Google Scholar; Warren, P. and Hankey, V., Aegean Bronze Age Chronology (Bristol, 1989Google Scholar). For examples of Vapheio cups with cotton-reel handles portrayed in Egyptian tombs of the 18th Dynasty see Kantor, , The Aegean and the Orient in the Second Millennium B.C. (1947), pl. IX D, EGoogle Scholar.
6 Davis, E. N., The Vapheio Cups and Aegean Gold and Silver Ware (New York, 1977) 72Google Scholar; Özgüç, T., Kültepe-Kaniş II (Ankara, 1986), pl. 124, 16, 17Google Scholar; Temizer, R., “Kayapınar Hüyügü Buluntaları”, Belleten XVIII (1954), Res. 15Google Scholar; Metal Vessels, Museum of Anatolian Civilisations (Ankara, 1992) No. 34Google Scholar (note the handle is shown with no. 33 but belongs to no. 34); see Temizer in Belleten, op. cit.
7 Özgüç, and Temizer, , “The Eskiyapar Treasure” in Studies in Honor of Nimet Özgüç (Ankara, 1993) 613–28Google Scholar; Haller, A., Die Gräber und Grüfte von Assur (Berlin, 1954) Taf. 10 hGoogle Scholar; Calmeyer, P., “Das Grab eines altassyrischen Kaufmanns”, Iraq XXXIX (1977) 81–97Google Scholar; Bittel, K., JDAI 74 (1959) 1–34Google Scholar: Metal Vessels (see n. 6) nos. 28, 29, 32, 37, 41–43.
8 Özgüç, T., “New Observations on the relationship of Kültepe with S.E. Anatolia and North Syria during the Third Millennium B.C.” in Ancient Anatolia, Aspects of change and Cultural Development, Essays in Honor of Machteld J. Mellink (Madison, 1986), 31–47Google Scholar.
9 Metal Vessels (see n. 6) Nos. 16, 17, 18, from Alaca, No. 32 from Eskiyapar; Bisson de la Roque, Documents de l'Institut Français, Pl. XV, No. 70583.
10 Özgüç, , “New finds from Horoztepe”, Anatolia VIII (1964) 1–25Google Scholar.
11 Özgüç, , “Some early Bronze Age objects from the district of Çorum”, Belleten XLIV (1980) pl. X, 468, 471Google Scholar.
12 D., and Oates, J., “Excavations at Tell Brak, 1992–3”, Iraq LV (1993) 155–99Google Scholar, figs. 12, 15; Documents de l'Institut Français, pl. IV.
13 Frayne, D. R., Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia II, Early Periods 2, Sargonic and Gutian Periods, No. 11, p. 27Google Scholar. For Yarmuti see Röllig, in RLA V 266Google Scholar, where a location in the coastal area of Southern Lebanon is proposed.
14 Analysed silver artifacts from Yener's eastern artifact group 2 include silver ingots from a pve-karum level at Acem Hüyük, a hoard of silver ingots from Mahatlar and a silver vessel from Alaca. Analysed silver artifacts from Syria and Mesopotamia include an Old Assyrian bracelet from Assur, a ring from Tello, a silver cup from Ur (PG800) and silver artifacts from Khafajeh. See Sayre, , Yener, , Joel, , “Statistical evaluation of the presently accumulated lead isotope data from Anatolia and the surrounding regions”, Archaeometry 34, 1 (1992), 73–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Yener, K. A., “The 1993 excavation season at Göltepe, Turkey”, in Archaeology (1994Google Scholar), Oriental Institute Annual Report, 33–42.
15 Archi, A. in Syrie, Mémoire et Civilisation, Catalogue of the Paris Exhibition 1993–1994, 112–13Google Scholar.
16 Alkım, U. B., AS XIV (1964), 23–25Google Scholar, AS XV (1965) 29–30Google Scholar; Anatolia I (Geneva, 1968Google Scholar), and in Archaeology 22 (1969), 288–9Google Scholar.
17 Woolley, C. L., Ur Excavations II, pls. 112, 113Google Scholar.
18 Limet, H., Le travail du métal au pays de Sumer au temps de la IIIe Dynastie d'Ur (Paris, 1960), 47, 144 ffGoogle Scholar.
19 ARM VII No. 239; ARM VI, nos. 14, 23Google Scholar; Guichard, M. in Syrie, Mémoire et Civilisation, 198Google Scholar. For the possibility that inventories of precious objects may sometimes refer to a special technique associated with a country rather than the actual origin of the object, see Maxwell-Hyslop, , “An illustration to a Mari inventory”, Iraq XXXIII (1970) 165CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
20 M. Guichard, op. cit. 196–9.
21 Archi, A. in Syrie, Mémoire et Civilisation, 113, 116 f., 111Google Scholar.
22 Matthiae, F., I Tresori di Ebla (Rome-Bari, 1984) Tav. 84Google Scholar.
23 See n. 2.
