Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-hb6bn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-08-18T02:13:43.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutritional evaluation of triple low rapeseed products for growing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. A. Agunbiade ,
J. Wiseman  and
D. J. A. Cole
J. A. Agunbiade
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD
J. Wiseman
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD
D. J. A. Cole
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD
Get access

Abstract

Ground full-fat rapeseed (FFRS) and the resulting extracted oil (RSO), meal (RSM) and recombined RSO and RSM (ORSM) from a triple-low cultivar containing low levels of erucic acid, glucosinolates and tannins were evaluated. RSO, FFRS and ORSM were included into a basal diet to give levels of added oil of 40, 80 and 120g/kg. RSM was also incorporated into the basal diet at the same rates as in ORSM. The 12 experimental diets together with the basal diet were given to 13 gilts in a metabolism trial conducted over four time periods. A 10-day acclimatization in holding pens preceded a 5-day total collection of faeces and urine in metabolism crates. Rapeseed products, diets, faeces and urine were analysed for gross energy (GE) and all, except urine, for oil content measured by two methods (petroleum ether and acid hydrolysis prior to ether extraction). Apparent digestible energy (DE) and metabolizable energy (ME) of rapeseed products were determined by single-level assay and by regression. Oil DE was also derived indirectly as a product of apparent oil digestibility (AOD) and oil GE. Apparent nitrogen digestibility was estimated for diets and rapeseed products. The response of dietary DE, ME and AOD to rates of test material inclusion was linear (P < 0·001) in all cases except for ORSM and RSM the DE and ME of which, in addition, showed evidence of curvilinearity. Age of pig had no significant effect on dietary AOD and energy values. Linear regression techniques were better than single level assays (particularly at low rates of inclusion) in determining energy values and gave DE values of 42·4, 190, 14·6 and 25·8 MJ/kg dry matter for RSO, FFRS, RSM and ORSM respectively. Oil DE and AOD were not influenced by method of evaluation. The results of this study indicated improved energy values for FFRS and RSM of a triple-low cultivar over published data for high-glucosinolate varieties but not over data for double-low varieties. In addition it appears that AOD is the main factor determining dietary utilization of FFRS and would need to be considered in order to optimize the nutritive value of FFRS in diets for growing pigs.

Keywords

nutritive valuepigsrapeseed

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , June 1991 , pp. 509 - 520
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Adams, K. L. and Jensen, A. H. 1984. Comparative utilization of in-seed fats and the respective extracted fats by the young pig. Journal of Animal Science 59: 1557–1566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, K. L. and Jensen, A. H. 1985. Effect of processing on the utilization by young pigs of the fat in soya beans and sunflower seeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 12: 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1981. The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1980. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. AOAC, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bayley, H. S., Slinger, S. J., Summers, J. D. and Ashton, G. C. 1974. Factors influencing the metabolizable energy value of rapeseed meal: level in diet, effects of steam-pelleting, age of chick, length of time on diet, variety of rapeseed and oil extraction procedure. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 54: 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayley, H. S. and Summers, J. D. 1975. Nutritional evaluation of extruded full-fat soybeans and rapeseeds using pigs and chickens. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 55: 441–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J. M., Anderson, D. M. and Shires, A. 1981. Evaluation of candle rapeseed meal as a protein supplement for swine. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 61: 453–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullen, M. P., Rasmussen, O. G. and Wilder, O. H. M. 1962. Metabolizable energy value and utilization of different types and grades of fat by the chick. Poultry Science 41: 360–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eusebio, J. A., Hay, V. W., Speer, V. C. and McCall, J. T. 1965. Utilization of fat by young pigs. Journal of Animal Science 24: 1001–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenwick, G. R. and Curtis, R. F. 1980. Rapeseed meal and its use in poultry diets. A review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 5: 255–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frobish, L. T., Hays, V. W., Speer, V. C. and Ewan, R. C. 1970. Effect of fat source and level on utilization of fat by young pigs. Journal of Animal Science 30: 197–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parliament, G.B.. 1985. The Feedingstuffs (Sampling and Analysis) (Amendment) Regulations. 1985. Statutory Instrument 1985 No. 1119. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Gomez, M. X. and Polin, D. 1974. Influence of cholic acid on the utilization of fats in the growing chicken. Poultry Science 53: 773–781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kan, C. A., Scheele, C. W. and Janssen, W. M. M. A. 1988. The energy content of full-fat soya beans in meal and pelleted feeds for adult cocks and broilers. Animal Feed Science and Technology 19: 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kromann, R. P., Froseth, J. A. and Meiser, W. E. 1976. Interactional digestible, metabolizable and net energy values of wheat and barley in swine. Journal of Animal Science 42: 1451–1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1984. Genstat V, Mark 4.04B. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. L. J. 1978. Effects of micronization on the digestibility of whole soya beans and rapeseeds for the growing pig. Animal Feed Science Technology 3: 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. and Payne, C. G. 1966. Fats and amino acids in broiler rations. 6. Synergistic relationships in fatty acid utilisation. British Poultry Science 7: 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mateos, G. G. and Sell, J. L. 1980a. True and apparent metabolizable energy value of fat for laying hens: influence of level of use. Poultry Science 59: 369–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mateos, G. G. and Sell, J. L. 1980b. Influence of carbohydrate and supplemental fat source on the metabolizable energy of the diet. Poultry Science 59: 2129–2135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mateos, G. G. and Sell, J. L. 1980C. Influence of graded levels of fat on utilization of pure carbohydrate by the laying hen. Journal of Nutrition 110: 1894–1903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mateos, G. G. and Sell, J. L. 1980d. Influence of fat and carbohydrate source on energy utilization by laying hens. Nutrition Reports International 22: 79–89.Google Scholar
May, R. W. and Bell, J. M. 1971. Digestible and metabolizable energy values of some feeds for the growing pig. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 51: 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D. J. 1976. Energy values in pig nutrition. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Muztar, A. J., Leeson, S. and Slinger, S. J. 1981. Effect of blending and level of inclusion on the metabolizable energy of tallow and tower rapeseed soapstocks. Poultry Science 60: 365–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petterson, A. 1964. [Lantbrukshoglskolans meddelelser, Ser. A., Nr. 16] Cited in Thorbek, G. and Henckel, S. 1977. Apparent digestibility of crude fat determined in trials with calves and pigs in relation to analytical methods applied. Zeitschrift fur Tierphysiologie, Tiererndhrung und Futtermittelkunde 39: 48–55.Google Scholar
Renner, R. and Hill, F. W. 1960. Studies of the effect of heat treatment on the metabolizable energy value of soybeans and extracted soybean flakes for the chick. Journal of Nutrition 70: 219–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowan, T. G. and Lawrence, T. L. J. 1986a. Growth, tissue deposition and metabolism studies in growing pigs given low glucosinolate rapeseed meal diets containing different polyethylene glycol. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107: 505–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowan, T. G. and Lawrence, T. L. J. 1986b. Growth and metabolism studies in growing pigs given diets containing a low glucosinolate rapeseed meal. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107: 483–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saben, H. S., Bowland, J. P. and Hardin, R. T. 1971. Digestible and metabolizable energy values for rapeseed meals and for soybean meal fed to growing pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 51: 419–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salo, M. L. 1980a. Nutritive value of full-fat rapeseeds for growing pigs. Journal of the Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland 52: 1–6.Google Scholar
Salo, M. L. 1980b. Nutritive value of rapeseed meal from two Brassica campestris varieties for growing pigs. Journal of the Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland 52: 45–49.Google Scholar
Sell, J. L., Tenesaca, L. G. and Bales, G. L. 1979. Influence of dietary fat on energy utilization by laying hens. Poultry Science 58: 900–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, H., Summers, J. D. and Leeson, S. 1983. The influence of steam pelleting and grinding on the nutritive value of canola rapeseed for poultry. Animal Feed Science and Technology 8: 303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibbald, I. R. and Kramer, J. K. G. 1977. The true metabolizable energy values of fats and fat mixtures. Poultry Science 56: 2079–2086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibbald, I. R. and Kramer, J. K. G. 1978. The effect of the basal diet on the true metabolizable energy value of fat. Poultry Science 57: 685–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibbald, I. R. and Price, K. 1977. The effects of level of dietary inclusion and of calcium on the true metabolizable energy value of fats. Poultry Science 56: 2070–2078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibbald, I. R. and Slinger, S. J. 1963. A biological assay for metabolizable energy in poultry feed ingredients together with findings which demonstrate some of the problems associated with the evaluation of fats. Poultry Science 42: 313–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibbald, I. R., Slinger, S. J. and Ashton, G. C. 1961. Factors affecting the metabolizable energy content of poultry feeds. 2. Variability in the ME values attributed to samples of tallow, and undegummed soybean oil. Poultry Science 40: 303–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjodin, J., Martensson, P. and Magyarosi, T. 1981. [Selection for antinutritional substances in field beans] (Vicia faba L.) Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzüchtung 86: 231–247.Google Scholar
Thorbek, G. and Henckel, S. 1977. [Apparent digestibility of crude fat determined in trials with calves and pigs in relation to analytical methods applied]. Zeitschrift für Tierphysiolgie, Tierernährung und Futtermittelkunde 39: 48–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VanEtten, C. H., McGrew, C. E. and Daxenbichler, M. E. 1974. Glucosinolate determination in cruciferous seeds and meals by measurement of enzymatically released glucose. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 22: 483–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiseman, J. 1990. Variability in the nutritive value of fats for non-ruminants. In Feedingstuff Evaluation (ed. Wiseman, J. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 215–234. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, J. and Cole, D. J. A. 1987. The digestible and metabolizable energy of two fat blends for growing pigs as influenced by level of inclusion. Animal Production 45: 117–122.Google Scholar
Wiseman, J., Cole, D. J. A. and Hardy, B. 1990. The dietary energy values of soyabean oil, tallow and their blends for growing/finishing pigs. Animal Production 50: 513–518.Google Scholar
Wiseman, J., Cole, D. J. A., Perry, F. G., Vernon, B. G. and Cooke, B. C. 1986. Apparent metabolisable energy values of fat for broiler chicks. British Poultry Science 27: 561–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiseman, J. and Lessire, M. 1987. Interactions between fats of differing chemical content: apparent metabolisable energy values and apparent fat availability. British Poultry Science 28: 663–676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, R. J. 1961. The energy value of fats and fatty acids for chicks. 1. Metabolizable energy. Poultry Science 40: 1225–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, R. J. and Garrett, R. L. 1963. Effect of oleic and linoleic acids on the absorption of saturated fatty acids in the chick. Journal of Nutrition 81: 321–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed