Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:46:42.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of inbred and outbred sheep on two planes of nutrition 2. Responses to acute cold and heat exposure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. Slee ,
G. Wiener  and
Carol Woolliams
J. Slee
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research Edinburgh Research Station†, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9PS
G. Wiener
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research Edinburgh Research Station†, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9PS
Carol Woolliams
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research Edinburgh Research Station†, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9PS
Get access

Abstract

Four groups each of 14 sheep aged 11 to 13 months comprising outbred (O) and inbred (I, inbreeding coefficient 0·37 or 0·5) sheep reared on either a low plane (L, maintenance) or on a high plane (H, ad libitum) of nutrition from the age of 6 months were exposed first to acute cold and 1 week later to heat. Exposures in climate chambers ended for each sheep when rectal temperature decreased to 36°C (in the cold) or increased to 42·5°C (in the heat) subject to a limit of 8 h. Throughout the experiment, sheep were kept in matched quartets comprising one sheep of each type.

The average cold resistance times (min) were 161, 267, 348 and 381 for the LI, LO, HI and HO groups respectively, showing a significant effect of both inbreeding and plane of nutrition (P < 0·01). Five sheep in the HO group lasted the full 8 h in the cold chamber with little or no reduction in rectal temperature. Skin temperature at the mid side was significantly higher in L than in H sheep throughout cold exposure, but there was no effect of inbreeding.

Respiration rates were much higher before and during cold exposure in the H sheep, but there was no effect of inbreeding.

The residual correlation of cold resistance with live weight was 0·58, but differences in live weight do not explain all the differences in cold resistance and particularly do not explain the rapid decrease in rectal temperature of the LI sheep. It was concluded that under cold exposure a high level of nutrition was able to compensate partly for the disadvantages of inbreeding, and that outbreeding was able to compensate partly for the adverse effects of poor nutrition.

With heat exposure, there were no significant differences among the four groups in heat tolerance time, but within the 1st h, H sheep had slightly higher rectal temperatures and much higher respiration rates than L sheep. Inbreeding affected only the time taken to reach a respiration rate > 200 per min, which was longer in I (131 min) than in O sheep (113 min) and longer in L (149 min) than in H animals (96 min).

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 221 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cox, D. R. 1972. Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 34B: 187–220.Google Scholar
Doney, J. M. and Slee, J. 1972. General meteorological effects on sheep. In Progress in Biometeorology, Vol. I. Part III (ed. Tromp, S. W.), pp. 59–65. Swets and Zeitlinger, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Lamberson, W. R. and Thomas, D. L. 1984. Effects of inbreeding in sheep: a review. Animal Breeding Abstracts 52: 287–297.Google Scholar
Shafie, M. M. and Sharafeldin, M. A. 1965. Animal behaviour in the subtropics. 1. Heat tolerance in relation to grazing behaviour in sheep, Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 13: 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slee, J. 1966. Variation in the responses of shorn sheep to cold exposure. Animal Production 8: 425–434.Google Scholar
Slee, J. 1968. Body temperature and vasomotor responses in Scottish Blackface and Tasmanian Merino sheep subjected to slow cooling. Animal Production 10: 265–282.Google Scholar
Slee, J. 1974. The retention of cold acclimatization in sheep. Animal Production 19: 201–210.Google Scholar
Slee, J. 1985. Physiological responses and adaptations of sheep. In Stress Physiology in Livestock. Vol. II (ed. Yousef, M. K.), pp 112–127. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
Slee, J. and Forster, J. E. 1983. Habituation to cold in four breeds of sheep. Journal of Thermal Biology 4: 343–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slee, J. and Stott, A. W. 1986. Genetic selection for cold resistance in Scottish Blackface lambs. Animal Production 43: 397–404.Google Scholar
Slee, J. and Sykes, A. R. 1967. Acclimatization of Scottish Blackface sheep to cold. 1. Rectal temperature responses. Animal Production 9: 333–347.Google Scholar
Sykes, A. R. and Slee, J. 1968. Acclimatization of Scottish Blackface sheep to cold. 2. Skin temperature, heart rate, respiration rate, shivering intensity and skinfold thickness. Animal Production 10: 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, A. R. and Slee, J. 1969a. Cold exposure of Southdown and Welsh Mountain sheep. 1. Effects of breed, plane of nutrition and acclimatization to cold upon resistance to body cooling. Animal Production 11: 65–75.Google Scholar
Sykes, A. R. and Slee, J. 1969b. Cold exposure of Southdown and Welsh Mountain sheep. 2. Effects of breed, plane of nutrition and previous acclimatization to cold upon skin temperature, heart rate, shivering and respiration rate. Animal Production 11: 77–89.Google Scholar
Wiener, G., Woolliams, C. and Slee, J. 1988. A comparison of inbred and outbred sheep on two planes of nutrition. 1. Growth, food intake and wool growth. Animal Production 46: 213–220.Google Scholar