Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T08:18:33.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Milk production from silage and concentrates containing varying proportions of dried grass and cereals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

F. J. Gordon
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Hillsborough, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Get access

Summary

Twenty-eight lactating cows were used in an experiment of changeover design with four periods to evaluate concentrates containing 0, 16, 32, 49, 65, 81 and 97% dried grass. The dry matter of the dried grass was 63% digestible. The concentrates also contained barley, together with groundnut meal to equalize their protein content at approximately 16-5% of dry matter. All animals had grass silage ad libitum and all concentrates were given at the rate of 0·4 kg/kg milk. Milk yield, milk composition and liveweight change were not affected by including dried grass in the concentrate. No significant effect of concentrate on silage intake was obtained. Ration digestibility and nitrogen utilization were measured with four animals per treatment. The digestibility of dry matter, organic matter and nitrogen was not reduced by increasing the proportion of dried grass in the concentrate. The efficiency of utilization of apparently digested nitrogen for total productive purposes (body retention and milk nitrogen) was also not affected by the proportion of dried grass.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Connell, J. 1968. Supplementation of dried grass with barley straw. Ann. Rep. Nat. Inst. Res. Dairying 1968, pp. 4647.Google Scholar
Connell, J. and Jones, J. G. W. 1968. The dried grass cube as a production concentrate for the dairy cow. Anim. Prod. 10: 231 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. and Forbes, T. J. 1970. The associative effect of level of energy and protein intake in the dairy cow. J. Dairy Res. 37: 481491.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. and Kormos, J. 1973. The effect of level of feeding of dried grass on milk production and the value of dried grass as a replacement for conventional dairy concentrates. Anim. Prod. 16: 235243.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. and Murdoch, J. C. 1970. A note on the use of dried grass in milk production. Rec. agric. Res. Min. Agric. Nth. Ire. 19: 6162.Google Scholar
Lino, E. R. 1963. A Text Book of Dairy Chemistry. Vol 2. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Lucas, H. L. 1943. A method of equalised feeding for studies with dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 26: 10111021.Google Scholar
McIlmoyle, W. A. 1973. The intake and utilisation of silage based diets with a cerealbased concentrate or dried grass. Ph.D. Thesis, Queen's University, Belfast.Google Scholar
McIlmoyle, W. A., Murdoch, J. C. and Gordon, F. J. 1975. A note on the use of dried grass as a component of concentrate mixtures for lactating dairy cows. Anim. Prod. 20: 165168.Google Scholar
Patterson, H. D. and Lucas, H. L. 1962. Change-over designs. Tech. Bull. N. Carol, agric. Exp. Stn No. 147.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. and Aston, K. 1973. Dried grass v. barley as a concentrate for milk production. Grass—J. Br. Assoc. Green Crop Driers, No. 6, pp. 38.Google Scholar