Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T10:18:50.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationships between pre- and post-weaning growth traits in lambs of Iranian fat-tailed sheep and their crosses with Corriedale and Targhee rams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. Farid  and
M. Makarechian
A. Farid
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Pahlavi University, Shiraz, Iran
M. Makarechian
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Pahlavi University, Shiraz, Iran
Get access

Abstract

The pre-weaning records (birth weight, weaning weight and gain from birth to weaning) of 291 male and female lambs and the post-weaning records (body weight, feedlot gain and food conversion) of 136 male lambs were used to study relationships between different traits. The lambs were derived from three fat-tailed Iranian sheep breeds (Karakul, Mehraban and Naeini) and their crosses with Corriedale and Targhee rams. All lambs were weaned at 75 + 5 days of age and the males were fed in a feedlot for 100 days after weaning. Feedlot measurements were taken at 20-day intervals.

Weaning weight and pre-weaning average daily gain showed positive and significant associations with birth weight. Birth weight, weaning weight and gain from birth to weaning were positively associated with body weight at subsequent ages in feedlot as well as with final weight (P<0·01). Birth weight, weaning weight and pre-weaning average daily gain were positively and significantly associated with total feedlot gain.

Of the different traits, total gain during the first 20 days in feedlot (adjust period) had the lowest and total gain during the second 20 days had the highest association with total feedlot daily gain. There was no evidence that the heavier lambs at weaning and those showing high growth rate before weaning, were more efficient in the feedlot. Gain during the second 20-day period in the feedlot had a significant negative association with the total food conversion (unit food/unit gain) and therefore was a good predictor for food conversion.

When the feedlot period was divided into two 40-day periods, it was found that gain during both had a significant negative association with the corresponding food conversion. A similar association was observed between total feedlot gain and food conversion, indicating that the rate and efficiency of gain improved simultaneously.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , April 1978 , pp. 185 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Botkin, M. P. 1955. Selection for efficiency of gain in lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 14: 1176 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Botkin, M. P. 1964. Post-weaning performance in Columbia and Corriedale lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 132–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brothers, D. G. and Whiteman, J. V. 1961. Influence of early weaning on creep-fed milk lambs when weaned on weight or age. J. Anim. Sci. 20: 420–425.Google Scholar
Butcher, R. L., Dunbar, R. S. Jr and Welch, J. A. 1964. Heritabilities of and correlations between lamb birth weight and 140-day weight. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 12–15.Google Scholar
Fahmy, M. H., Galal, E., Salah, E., Ghanem, Y. S. and Khishin, S. S. 1969. Genetic parameters of Barki sheep raised under semi-arid conditions. Anim. Prod. 11: 361–367.Google Scholar
Farid, A. and Makarechian, M. 1976. Some sources of variation in the body weights of Karakul, Mehraban, Naeini and Bakhtiari breeds of sheep. Iran. J. agric. Res. 4: 7–16.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. 1970. Estimation of variance and covariance components in the mixed model. Biometrics 26: 485–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, F. S., Mansfield, M. E. and Lewis, J. M. 1960. Early weaning of lambs: a comparison of the performance of lambs weaned at six and nine weeks of age. J. Anim. Sci. 19: 1306 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Makarechian, M. and Farid, A. 1977. Crossbreeding of Iranian fat-tailed sheep. III. The relationship of pre and post weaning growth performance of lambs. Iran. J. agric. Res. (In press).Google Scholar
Makarechian, M., Farid, A. and Sefidbakht, N. 1977. Lamb growth performance of Iranian fat-tailed Karakul, Mehraban and Naeini breeds of sheep and their crosses with Corriedale and Targhee rams. Anim. Prod. 25: 331–341.Google Scholar
Makarechian, M., Farid, A., Sefidbakht, N. and Mostafavi, M. S. 1973. The influence of breed and weaning age on feedlot performance of Iranian fat-tailed sheep. Iran. J. agric. Res. 2: 21–29.Google Scholar
Nichols, C. W. and Whiteman, J. V. 1966. Productivity of farm flock ewe in relation to body size. J. Anim. Sci. 25: 460–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Fraser, C., Gill, J. C. and CORSE, ELIZABETH L. 1971. The effect in an intensive production system of type of cereal and time of weaning on the performance of lambs. Anim. Prod. 13: 485–492.Google Scholar
Ross, C. V. and Lawson, G. L. 1962. Effects of early weaning and drylot feeding on lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 1040 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Shelton, M. 1964. Relation of birth weight to death losses and to certain productive characters of fall-born lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 355–359.Google Scholar
Thrift, F. A., Whiteman, J. V. and Kratzer, D. D. 1973. Genetic analysis of preweaning and postweaning lamb growth traits. J. Anim. Sci. 36: 640–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vesely, J. A., Peters, H. F., Slen, S. B. and Robison, O. W. 1970. Heritabilities and genetic correlations in growth and wool traits of Rambouillet and Romnelet sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 30: 174–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wardrop, I. D., Tribe, D. E. and Coombe, J. B. 1960. An experimental study of the early weaning of lambs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 55: 133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar