Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T10:16:11.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of lactating ewes grazing grass to variations in effective rumen degradable protein and digestible undegradable protein supply from concentrate supplements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

R. G. Wilkinson ,
L. A. Sinclair ,
J. Powles  and
C. M. Minter
R. G. Wilkinson
Affiliation:
Animal Science Research Centre, School of Agriculture, Harper Adams University College, Edgmond, Newport, Shropshire TF10 8NB, UK
L. A. Sinclair
Affiliation:
Animal Science Research Centre, School of Agriculture, Harper Adams University College, Edgmond, Newport, Shropshire TF10 8NB, UK
J. Powles
Affiliation:
Animal Science Research Centre, School of Agriculture, Harper Adams University College, Edgmond, Newport, Shropshire TF10 8NB, UK
C. M. Minter
Affiliation:
Animal Science Research Centre, School of Agriculture, Harper Adams University College, Edgmond, Newport, Shropshire TF10 8NB, UK
Get access

Abstract

The response of lactating ewes grazing grass to variations in effective rumen degradable protein (ERDP) and digestible undegradable protein (DUP) supply from concentrates was investigated. During the spring and early summer of 1993, 36 Friesland and 12 Finn Dorset ewes were offered continuous access to permanent pasture (Lolium perenne) and allocated to one of six concentrates (1·2 kg/day) formulated to be iso-energetic and to supply 149 (H), 126 (M) or 103 (L) g ERDP and 70 (A) or 45 (B) g DUP per kg dry matter (DM) in a 3 ✕ 2 factorial design. Herbage intake was estimated using the n-alkane technique and herbage samples obtained for analysis. Ewe milk yields, milk composition, live weights (LW) and condition scores (CS) were recorded weekly. The DM and nitrogen degradability characteristics of the grass samples and concentrates were determined using four Friesland wether lambs fitted with permanent rumen cannulae. Throughout the experiment the grass ERDP: FME ratio was lower than the optimum for maximal microbial protein synthesis. However, using a rumen solid phase outflow rate of 0·05 per h, estimated concentrate ERDP and DUP supplies were similar to those predicted. Increasing concentrate ERDP supply had no effect on herbage intake or LW and CS change but reduced milk fat concentration (P < 0·05) and increased milk lactose concentration (P < 0·05) and the yields of milk (P < 0·01), protein (P < 0·05) and lactose (P < 0·01). There were no significant effects of concentrate DUP supply. In conclusion, it is suggested that concentrate ERDP increased microbial protein synthesis and metabolizable protein supply, a proportion of which may have been deaminated to provide precursors for milk lactose synthesis, such that the marginal response in milk protein yield was 0·210.

Keywords

ewesgrazingprotein intake
Type
Ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , October 2000 , pp. 369 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Development and Advisory Service. 1989. Tables of rumen degradability values for ruminant feedstuffs. ADAS Feed Evaluation Unit, UK.Google Scholar
Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1992. Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. Report no 9. Nutritive requirements of ruminant animals: protein. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, Series B 62: 787–835.Google Scholar
Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. An advisory manual prepared by the AFRC Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1980. Official methods of analysis, 13th edition. AOAC, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E. and Siddons, R. C. 1986. Digestion and metabolism in the grazing ruminant In Proceedings of the fourth international symposium on ruminant physiology (ed. L. P. Milligan, , Grovum, W. L. and Dobson, A.), pp. 479–497. Englewood, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C., Freer, M. and Balch, C. C. 1962. Factors affecting the voluntary intake of food by cows. 3. The effect of urea on the voluntary intake of oat straw. British Journal of Nutrition 16: 115–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choung, J. J. and Chamberlain, D. G. 1992. Protein nutrition of dairy cows recieving grass silage diets. Effect on silage intake and milk production of post ruminal supplements of casein or soya protein isolate and the effects of intravenous infusions of a mixture of methionine, phenylalanine and tryptophan. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 58: 307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, H. R., Pratt, A. D. and Hibbs, J. W. 1964. Regulation of food intake in dairy cows. 1. Changes in importance of physical and physiological factors with increasing digestibility. Journal of Dairy Science 47: 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottrill, B. R. 1993. Characterisation of nitrogen in ruminant feeds. In Recent advances in animal nutrition (ed. Garnsworthy, P. C. and D. Cole, J. A.), pp. 39–54. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham.Google Scholar
DePeters, E. J. and Cant, J. P. 1992. Nutritional factors influencing the nitrogen composition of milk: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 2043–2070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dias-da-Silva, A. A. and Sundstøl, F. 1986. Urea as a source of ammonia for improving the nutritive value of wheat straw. Animal Science and Feed Technology 14: 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowman, M. G. and Collins, F. C. 1982. The use of enzymes to predict the digestibility of animal feeds. Journal of the Science of Food Technology 33: 689–696.Google Scholar
Garnsworthy, P. C. and Jones, G. P. 1987. The influence of body condition at calving and dietary protein supply on voluntary food intake and performance in dairy cows. Animal Production 44: 347–353.Google Scholar
Givens, D. I., Moss, A. R. and Adamson, A. H. 1993. Influence of growth stage and season on the energy value of fresh herbage. 2. Relationship between digestibility and metabolisable energy and various laboratory measurements. Grass and Forage Science 48: 175–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goering, H. K. and Van Soest, P. J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agricultural handbook no. 379 Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. 1990. Grazing management: science into practice. Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow.Google Scholar
Holmes, W. 1980. Grass: its production and utilisation. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
Huntington, J. A. and Givens, I. 1995. The in situ technique for studying the rumen degradation of feeds: a review of the procedure. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, Series B 65: 63–93.Google Scholar
Jones, G. P. and Garnsworthy, P. C. 1988. The effects of body condition at calving and dietary protein content on dry-matter intake and performance in lactating dairy cows given diets of low energy content. Animal Production 47: 321–333.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1992. GENSTAT 5 version 3·1 reference manual. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Mangan, J. L. 1982. The nitrogenous constituents of fresh forage. In Forage protein in ruminant animal production (ed. Thomas, D. J., Beever, D. E. and Gunn, R. G.), British Society of Animal Production occasional publication no. 6, pp. 25–40.Google Scholar
Mayes, R. W., Lamb, C. S. and Colgrove, P. M. 1986. The use of dosed and herbage n-alkanes as markers for the determination of herbage intake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107: 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1981. Reference booklet 427. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1992. Feed composition. UK tables of feed composition and nutritive value for ruminants. Chalcombe Publications, UK.Google Scholar
Morris, S. T., McCutcheon, S. N., Parker, W. J. and Blair, H. T. 1994. Effect of sward surface height on herbage intake and performance of lactating ewes lambed in winter and continuously stocked on pasture. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 122: 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbold, J. R. 1987. Nutrient requirements of intensively reared beef cattle. In Recent advances in animal nutrition (ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D.J. A.), pp. 143–172. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbold, J. R. 1994. Practical application of the metabolisable protein system. In Recent advances in animal nutrition (ed. Garnsworthy, P. C. and Cole, D.J. A.), pp. 231–264. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham.Google Scholar
Oldham, J. D. 1984. Protein energy interrelationships in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 67: 1090–1114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oldham, J. D. 1994. Amino acid nutrition of dairy cows. In Amino acid nutrition of farm animals (ed. J. P. F. D’Mello), pp. 351–375. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Hughes-Jones, M. and McDonald, I. 1981. Degradability of protein supplements and utilisation of undegraded protein by the high producing dairy cow. In Recent developments in ruminant nutrition (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 85–98. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. and McDonald, I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92: 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, W. J. and McCutcheon, S. N. 1992. Effect of sward height on herbage intake and production of ewes of different rearing rank during lactation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 118: 383–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, J. N. 1967. The effect of different levels of nutrition during late pregnancy on the subsequent milk production of Blackface ewes and on the growth of their lambs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 68: 365–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penning, P. D., Orr, R. J. and Treacher, T. T. 1988. Responses of lactating ewes, offered fresh herbage indoors and when grazing, to supplements containing differing protein concentrations. Animal Production 46: 403–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penning, P. D., Parsons, A. J., Orr, R. J. and Hooper, G. E. 1994. Intake and behaviour responses by sheep to changes in sward characteristics under rotational grazing. Grass and Forage Science 49: 476–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhind, S. M., Bass, J. and Doney, J. M. 1992. Pattern of milk production of East Friesland and Scottish Blackface ewes and associated blood metabolite and hormone profiles. Animal Production 54: 265–273.Google Scholar
Schingoethe, D. J. 1996. Dietary influence on protein level in milk and milk yield in dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 60: 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, L. A. and Scoffield, D. M. 1996. Effects of level of concentrate on eating behaviour, predicted hourly nutrient release in the rumen and performance in ewes given grass silage. Animal Science 62: 672 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Sniffen, C. J. and Robinson, P. H. 1987. Microbial growth and flow as influenced by dietary manipulation. Journal of Dairy Science 70: 425–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamminga, S. 1992. Nutrition management of dairy cows as a contribution to pollution control. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 345–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, P. C. and Martin, P. A. 1988. The influence of nutrient balance on milk yield and composition. In Nutrition and lactation in the dairy cow (ed. Garnsworthy, P. C.), pp. 97–118. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, P. C., Robertson, S., Chamberlain, D. G., Livingstone, R. M., Garthwaite, P. H., Dewey, P. J. S. and Cole, D. J. A. 1988. Predicting the metabolisable energy content of compounded feeds for ruminants. In Recent advances in animal nutrition (ed. W. Haresign and D. Cole, J. A.), pp. 127–146. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Valk, H. 1994. Effect of partial replacement of herbage by maize silage on nitrogen utilisation and milk production of dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 40: 241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valk, H., Klein Pooelhuis, H. W. and Wentink, H. J. 1990. The effect of fibrous and starchy carbohydrates in concentrate mixtures as supplements in herbage based diets for high yielding dairy cows. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 38: 475–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. 1982. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. O and B Books, Corvallis, OR.Google Scholar
Vulich, S. A. 1994. A note on the use of alternative saponification procedures for the determination of n-alkanes in faeces. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 33: 71–73.Google Scholar
Vulich, S. A., O’Riordan, E. G. and Hanrahan, J. P. 1991a. Use of n-alkanes for the estimation of herbage intake in sheep: accuracy and precision of the estimates. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 116: 319–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vulich, S. A., O’Riordan, E. G. and Hanrahan, J. P. 1991b. Effect of litter size on herbage intake at pasture by ewes and their progeny. Animal Production 53: 191–197.Google Scholar
Vuuren, A. M. van and Meijs, J. A. C. 1987. Effects of herbage composition and supplement feeding on the excretion of nitrogen in dung and urine by grazing dairy cows. In Animal manures on grassland and fodder crops: fertilizer or waste (ed. Meer, H. G. van der, Unwin, R. J., van Dijk, T. A. and Ennik, G. C.), pp. 17–25. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuuren, A. M. van, Tamminga, S. and Ketelaar, R. S. 1990. Ruminal availability of nitrogen and carbohydrate from fresh and preserved herbage in dairy cows. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 38: 499–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuuren, A. M.van, Tamminga, S. and Ketelaar, R. S. 1991. In sacco degradation of organic matter and crude protein of fresh grass (Lolium perenne) in the rumen of grazing dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 116: 429–436.Google Scholar
Wainman, F. W., Dewey, P. J. S. and Boyne, A. W. 1981. Compound feedstuffs for ruminants. Third report of the Feedstuffs Evaluation Unit. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Waters, C. J. and Givens, D. I. 1992. Nitrogen degradability of fresh herbage: effect of maturity and growth type, and prediction from chemical composition and by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Animal Feed Science and Technology 38: 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. 1992. The metabolisable protein system for ruminants. In Recent advances in animal nutrition (ed. Garnsworthy, P. C., Haresign, W. and Cole, D.J. A.), pp. 93–110. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, M. W., Sinclair, L. A., Wilkinson, R. G. and Buttery, P. J. 2000. The effects of synchronising the rate of dietary energy and nitrogen supply to the rumen on milk production and metabolism of ewes offered grass silage based diets. Animal Science 70: 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, M. W., Sinclair, L. A., Wilkinson, R. G. and Buttery, P. J. 1999. The effects of synchronizing the rate of dietary energy and nitrogen supply to the rumen on the production and metabolism of sheep: food characterization and growth and metabolism of ewe lambs given food ad libitum . Animal Science 69: 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar