Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T06:41:52.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The weight and concentration of body components in high genetic merit Holstein-Friesian dairy cows managed on four different grassland-based feeding regimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

V. B. Woods*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR, UK
C. P. Ferris
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR, UK
F. J. Gordon
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR, UK
Get access

Abstract

It is well established that the genetic merit of the Holstein-Friesian dairy cow for milk production has increased over the past 20 years. Previous studies have examined the effect of feeding system on indices of body tissue reserves of medium genetic merit Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. The aim of the current study was to examine the weight and concentration of body components in high genetic merit Holstein-Friesian dairy cows, managed on four different grassland-based feeding regimes, using direct measures of body composition. Results indicate that there was no significant effect of different grassland-based feeding regimes on the weight or composition of body components of high genetic merit cows. Therefore, high levels of cow performance can be sustained from very different grassland-based systems of milk production without having a detrimental effect on body tissue reserves.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of official Analytical Chemists. 1996. Official methods of analysis, 16th edition. Gaithersburg, MA.Google Scholar
Bligh, E. G. and Dyer, W. J. 1959. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physics 37: 911917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broster, W. H. 1972. Effect on milk yield of the cow of the level of feeding during lactation. Dairy Science Abstracts 34: 265288.Google Scholar
Butler-Hogg, B. W., Wood, J. D. and Bines, J. A. 1985. Fat partitioning in British-Friesian cows: the influence of physiological state on dissected body composition. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 104: 519528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, A. J., Lean, I. J., Weaver, J. D., Farver, T. and Webster, G. 1989. A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 6878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, C. P., Gordon, F. J., Patterson, D. C., Mayne, C. S. and Kilpatrick, D. J. 1999a. The influence of dairy cow genetic merit on the direct and residual response to level of concentrate supplementation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 132: 467481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, C. P., Gordon, F. J., Patterson, D. C., Mayne, C. S. and McCoy, M. A. 2003. A short-term comparison of the performance of four grassland-based systems of milk production for autumn-calving dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 58: 192209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, C. P., Gordon, F. J., Patterson, D. C., Porter, M. G. and Yan, T. 1999b. The effect of genetic merit and concentrate proportion in the diet on nutrient utilization by lactating dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 132: 483490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, C. P., McCoy, M. A., Lennox, S. D., Catney, D. C. and Gordon, F. J. 2002. Nutrient utilization and energy balance associated with two contrasting winter milk production systems for high genetic merit autumn calving dairy cows. Irish Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 41: 5570.Google Scholar
Genstat 5 Committee. 1993. Genstat 5, release 3 reference manual. Oxford Science Publications, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gibb, M. J. and Ivings, W. E. 1993. A note on the estimation of the body fat, protein and energy content of lactating Holstein-Friesian cows by measurement of condition score and live weight. Animal Production 56: 281283.Google Scholar
Gibb, M. J., Ivings, W. E., Dhanoa, M. S. and Sutton, J. D. 1992. Changes in body components of autumn-calving Holstein-Friesian cows over the first 29 weeks of lactation. Animal Production 55: 339360.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1984. The effect of level of concentrate supplementation given with grass silage during the winter on the total lactation performance of autumn-calving dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102: 163179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, F. J., Ferris, C. P., Patterson, D. C. and Mayne, C. S. 2000. A comparison of two grassland-based systems for autumn-calving dairy cows of high genetic merit. Grass and Forage Science 55: 8396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, F. J., Patterson, D. C., Yan, T., Porter, M. G., Mayne, C. S. and Unsworth, E. F. 1995. The influence of genetic index for milk production on the response to complete diet feeding and the utilization of energy and nitrogen. Animal Science 61: 199210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivings, W. E., Gibb, M. J., Dhanoa, M. S. and Fisger, A. V. 1993. Relationships between velocity of ultrasound in live lactating dairy cows and some post-slaughter measurements of body composition. Animal Production 56: 916.Google Scholar
Lindberg, C. M., Swanson, G. J. T. and Mrode, R. A. 1998. Genetic and phenotypic trends in production traits in the United Kingdom (UK) dairy herd. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, p. 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M. G. 1992. Comparison of sample preparation methods for the determination of the gross energy concentration of fresh silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology 37: 3–4 and 201208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, I. A. and Russel, A. J. F. 1984. The composition and energy content of empty body-weight change in mature cattle. Animal Production 39: 365369.Google Scholar