Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T20:48:48.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of feeding a high fibre diet on the welfare of sows housed in large dynamic groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

CL Stewart ,
LA Boyle ,
MEE McCann  and
NE O’Connell
CL Stewart*
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute Hillsborough, Large Park, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 6DR, UK
LA Boyle
Affiliation:
Pig Research and Development Department, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co Cork, Ireland
MEE McCann
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute Hillsborough, Large Park, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 6DR, UK
NE O’Connell
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University Belfast BT9 7BL, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: charlotte.stewart@devenishnutrition.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study assessed the effect of increasing fibre levels in the concentrate ration on the welfare of sows housed in a large dynamic group. One hundred and twelve Large White * Landrace sows were allocated to one of two treatments over six replicates. Treatments were as follows: (i) High Fibre diet (~15% CF [Crude Fibre]), and (ii) Control diet (~5% CF). Treatments were applied to two separate dynamic groups each containing 33 (±3) sows in a cross-over design, after three replicates the treatments were switched between the groups. Approximately nine sows were replaced in each of these groups at 3-week intervals (each replacement constituting a replicate of the study). Sows on the high fibre diet spent a greater percentage of time lying (High Fibre: 43.8, Control: 28.0, SEM 3.25%), while sows on the control diet spent more time sham chewing (High Fibre: 7.2, Control: 28.8, SEM 1.55%). Sows newly introduced to the group on the high fibre treatment spent proportionally more time in the kennel areas compared to newly introduced sows in the control treatment (High Fibre: 0.893, Control: 0.788, SEM 5.10). In general, aggression occurred at a very low frequency and overall levels did not differ between treatments (High Fibre: 0.005, Control: 0.003, SEM 0.0007 [occurrences per min]). However, sows in the control treatment performed head thrusting (High Fibre: 0.02, Control: 0.00, SEM 0.001 [occurrences per min]), and biting behaviour (High Fibre: 0.02, Control: 0.01, SEM 0.002 [occurrences per min]) more frequently than sows on the high fibre diet. There was no effect of treatment on physiological parameters such as plasma cortisol (High Fibre: 1.34, Control: 1.44, SEM 0.114 ng ml−1) or haptoglobin levels (High Fibre: 0.73, Control: 0.64, SEM 0.080 mg ml−1). In summary, provision of a high fibre diet had a positive effect on the welfare of group-housed dry sows. Sows on the high fibre treatment spent more time resting in the kennel areas, less time performing stereotypic behaviours and showed a reduction in some aggressive behaviours relative to sows fed the control diet.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourdynamic grouphigh fibre dietsphysiological measuressows
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , August 2010 , pp. 349 - 357
Copyright
© 2010 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brouns, F and Edwards, SA 1994 Social rank and feeding behaviour of group-housed sows fed competitively or ad libitum. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39: 225–235Google Scholar
Cooper, DR, Patience, JF, Zijlstra, RT and Rademacher, M 2001 Effect of energy and lysine intake in gestation on sow performance. Journal of Animal Science 79: 2367–2377CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Council Directive 2001/88/EC 2001 Directive of 23rd October 2001 amending Directive 91/630/EEC laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs. http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/welfare/farmed/pigs/Google Scholar
De Leeuw, JA, Zonderland, JJ, Altena, H, Spoolder, HAM, Jongbloed, J and Verstegen, MWA 2005 Effects of levels and sources of dietary fermentable non-starch polysaccharides on blood glucose stability and behaviour of group-housed pregnant gilts. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 94: 15–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durrell, JL 2000 Sow behaviour, skin lesions and productivity in small static versus large dynamic groups. PhD Thesis, Queens University Belfast, UKGoogle Scholar
Hicks, TA, McGlone, JJ, Whisnant, CS, Kattesh, HG and Norman, RL 1998 Behavioural, endocrine, immune and performance measures for pigs exposed to acute stress. Journal of Animal Science 76: 474–483CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, KH, S⊘rensen, LS, Bertelsen, D, Pedersen, AR, J⊘rgensen, E, Nielsen, NP and Vestergaard, KS 2000 Management factors affecting activity and aggression in dynamic group housing systems with electronic sow feeding: a field trial. Animal Science 71: 535–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
J⊘rgensen, H, Serena, A, Hedemann, MS and Bach Knudsen, KE 2007 The fermentative capacity of growing pigs and adult sows fed diets with contrasting type and level of dietary fibre. Livestock Science 109: 111–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, LJ, Noll, S, Renteria, A and Shurson, J 2003 Feeding by-products high in concentration of fibre to non-ruminants. Third National Symposium on Alternative Feeds for Livestock and Poultry. 4 November 2003, Kansas City, USAGoogle Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust 1989 Lawes Agricultural Trust, Genstat 5 Reference Manual. Clarendon Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, AB and Terlouw, EMC 1993 A review of behavioural factors involved in the development and continued performance of stereotypic behaviours in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 71: 2815–2825CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levrino, MGA and Robinson, MV 2003 Welfare status of commercial sows in three housing systems in Spain. Archivos de Zootecnia 52: 455–462Google Scholar
Mahan, DC 1998 Relationship of gestation protein and feed intake level over a five-parity period using a high-producing sow genotype. Journal of Animal Science 76: 533–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendl, MT, Broom, DM and Zanella, AJ 1993 The effects of three types of dry sow housing on sow welfare. Livestock Environment IV 4th International Symposium pp 461–467. 6-9 July 1993, University of Warwick, UKGoogle Scholar
Meunier-Salaün, MC, Edwards, SA and Robert, S 2001 Effect of dietary fibre on the behaviour and health of restricted fed sow. Animal Feed Science and Technology 90: 53–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, AS, Gonyou, HW and Ghent, AW 1993 Intergration of newly introduced and resident sows following grouping. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 38: 257–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, RI, McGlone, JJ and Reid, LN 1993 Quantification of stress in sows: comparison of individual housing versus social penning. Journal of Animal Science 71: 112Google Scholar
O’Connell, NE, Beattie, VE and Moss, BW 2003 Influence of social status on the welfare of sows in static and dynamic groups. Animal Welfare 12: 239–249Google Scholar
O’Connell, NE, Beattie, VE and Moss, BW 2004 Influence of replacement rate on the welfare of sows introduced to a large dynamic group. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 85: 43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, NE, Beattie, VE and Weatherup, RN 2002 Influence of feeder type on the performance and behaviour of weaned pigs. Livestock Production Science 74: 13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramonet, Y, Meunier-Salaün, MC and Dourmad, JY 1999 High-fibre diets in pregnant sows: digestive utilization and effects on the behaviour of the animals. Journal of Animal Science 77: 591–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramonet, Y, Robert, S, Aumaître, A, Dourmad, JY and Meunier-Salaün, MC 2000a Influence of the nature of dietary fibre on the digestive utilization, some metabolite and hormone profiles and the behaviour of pregnant sows. Animal Science 70: 275–286Google Scholar
Ramonet, Y, van Milgen, J, Dourmad, JY, Dubois, S, Meunier-Salaün, MC and Noblet, J 2000b The effect of dietary fibre on energy utilisation and partitioning of heat production over pregnancy in sows. British Journal of Nutrition 84: 85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert, S, Matte, JJ, Farmer, C, Girard, CL and Martineau, GP 1993 High-fibre diets for sows: effects on stereotypies and adjunctive drinking. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37: 297–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serena, A, Hedemann, MS and Bach Knudsen, KE 2007 Feeding high fibre diets changes luminal environment and morphology in the intestine of sows. Livestock Science 109: 115–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmins, PH 1993 Reproductive performance of sows entering stale and dynamic groups after mating. Animal Production 57: 293–298Google Scholar
Spoolder, HAM 1998 Effects of food motivation on stereotypies and aggression in group-housed sows. PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Spoolder, HAM, Burbidge, JA, Edwards, SA, Simmins, PH and Lawrence, AB 1995 Provision of straw as a foraging substrate reduces the development of excessive chain and bar manipulation in food restricted sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 43: 249–262Google Scholar
Sutherland, MA, Niekamp, SR, Rodriguez-Zas, SL and Salak-Johnson, JL 2006 Impacts of chronic stress and social status on various physiological and performance measures in pigs of difference breeds. Journal of Animal Science 84: 588–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ 1976 Laboratory Methods for Evaluating the Energy Value of Feedstuffs, in Feed and Energy Sources for Livestock Butterworths: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, X, Edwards, SA, Spoolder, HAM, Lawrence, AB and Corning, S 1999 Effects of straw bedding and high fibre diets on the behaviour of floor fed group-housed sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 63: 25–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y, Heo, S, Jin, Z, Yun, J, Shinde, P, Choi, J, Yang, B and Chae, B 2008 Effects of dietary energy and lysine intake during late gestation and lactation on blood metabolites, hormones, milk composition and reproductive performance in multiparous sows. Archives of Animal Nutrition 62: 10–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zanella, AJ, Brunner, P, Unshelm, J, Mendle, MT and Broom, DM 1998 The relationship between housing and social rank on cortisol β-endorphin and dynorphin (1-13) secretion in sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 59: 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zonderland, JJ, De Leeuw, JA, Nolten, C and Spoolder, HAM 2004 Assessing long-term behavioural effects of feeding motivation in group-housed pregnant sows: what, when and how to observe. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 87: 15–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar