Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T03:23:21.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methods Used to Kill Fish: Field Observations and Literature Reviewed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

D H F Robb  and
S C Kestin
D H F Robb*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK
S C Kestin
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: dave.robb@ewos.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reviews the impact on fish welfare of a wide range of slaughter methods used commercially around the world. Because the end result of the slaughter is a food product, and because of the well-known relationship between an animal's welfare and subsequent meat quality, the effects of the slaughter methods on the quality of the flesh are also reviewed where possible. Fish slaughter methods are incredibly diverse, but fall into two broad categories: those that induce loss of sensibility slowly, and those that achieve this rapidly. This paper shows that, in general, the methods that induce loss of sensibility over a long period of time tend to impinge more on the welfare of the animal and are detrimental to the overall quality of the carcass. Methods that cause a rapid loss of sensibility result in the best welfare, providing that they are carried out correctly. They may also produce the highest quality product from the stock offish.

Keywords

animal welfarefishharvestkillingqualityslaughter
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , August 2002 , pp. 269 - 282
Copyright
© 2002 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Current address: EWOS Innovation, 4335 Dirdal, Norway

References

Anil, M H and McKinstry, J L 1998 Variations in electrical stunning tong placements and relative consequences in slaughter pigs. The Veterinary Journal 155: 85–90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anon 1995 Operating manual for the product certification schemes for Scottish quality farmed salmon and smoked Scottish quality salmon. Scottish Quality Salmon Ltd: Inverness, Scotland, UKGoogle Scholar
Aske, L and Midling, K 2001 Slaughtering of Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus): effects on quality and storing capacity. In: Kestin S C and Warriss P D (eds) Farmed Fish Quality p 381. Blackwells: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Azam, K, Mackie, I M and Smith, J 1989 The effect of slaughter method on the quality of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) during storage on ice. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 24: 69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermond, B 2001 A neuropsychological and evolutionary approach to animal consciousness and animal suffering. Animal Welfare 10: S47–S62Google Scholar
Boggess, T S Jr, Heaton, E K, Shewfelt, A L and Parvin, D W 1973 Techniques for stunning channel catfish and their effects on product quality. Journal of Food Science 38: 1190–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundesgesetzblatt 1993 Neufassung des Tierschutzgesetzes. Teil I Z 5702 A, Nr. 7: 254–267 [Title translation: New version of the animal protection laws]Google Scholar
Donaldson, EM 1981 The pituitary-interrenal axis as an indicator of stress in fish. In: Pickering, A D (ed) Stress and Fish pp 11–48. Academic Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Erikson, U 2001 Potential effects of preslaughter fasting, handling and transport. In: Kestin, S C and Warriss, P D (eds) Farmed Fish Quality pp 202–219. Blackwells: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
FAWC 1996 Report on the Welfare of Farmed Fish. Farm Animal Welfare Council: Surbiton, Surrey, UKGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D and Matthews, L R 1997 Preference and motivation testing. In: Appleby, M C and Hughes, B O (eds) Animal Welfare pp 159–173. CAB International: Wallingford, Oxon, UKGoogle Scholar
Frost, S, Poole, S and Grauf, S 1999 Improving the quality of Australian aquacultured barramundi (Lates calcarifer) through modified harvesting, handling and processing techniques. Report to Queensland Department of Primary Industries p 9. Queensland Department of Primary Industry: Brisbane, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Goodrick, G B, Frost, S M, Paterson, B D and ExIey, P S 1998 Rested harvest practices: the concept and techniques. Proceedings of WEFTA ‘98, the 28th Annual Meeting of the Western European Fish Technologists’ Association, 4-7 October, Tromsø, NorwayGoogle Scholar
Jerrett, A R, Stevens, J and Holland, A J 1996 Tensile properties of white muscle in rested and exhausted chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Journal of Food Science 61: 527–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kestin, S C 1996 Summary report of trial using chemical explosives. Internal report, Bristol University, UKGoogle Scholar
Kestin, S C, Wotton, S B and Gregory, N G 1991 Effect of slaughter by removal from water on visual evoked activity in the brain and reflex movement of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Veterinary Record 128: 443–446CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kestin, S, Wotton, S and Adams, A 1995 The effect of CO2, concussion or electrical stunning of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) on fish welfare. Proceedings of Aquaculture Europe ‘95, 9-12 August, Trondheim, Norway. Special Publication 23, p 380. European Aquaculture Society: Oostende, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
Kestin, S C, Robb, D H F, Wotton, S B and Warriss, P D 1997 The effect of two methods of electrical stunning on carcass haemorrhages in trout. Proceedings of the European Aquaculture Society Meeting, 10-12 August, Trondheim, Norway. Special publication, pp 46-47. European Aquaculture Society: Oostende, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
Kestin, S C, van de Vis, J W and Robb, D H F 2002 A simple protocol for assessing brain function in fish and the effectiveness of stunning and killing methods used on fish. Veterinary Record: in pressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, D E and Paust, B C 1988 Care of halibut aboard the fishing vessel. Marine Advisory Bulletin No. 18 (3rd edition), Alaska Sea Grant College Program. University of Alaska Fairbanks: Fairbanks, USAGoogle Scholar
Lowe, T E, Ryder, J M, Carragher, J F and Wells, R M G 1993 Flesh quality in snapper, Pagurus auratus, affected by capture stress. Journal of Food Science 58: 770–773, 796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAFF 1995 The Welfare of Animals (Slaughter or Killing) Regulations. Statutory Instruments No. 731. HMSO: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Marx, H, Brunner, B and Weinzierl, W 1997 Methods of stunning freshwater fish: impact on meat quality and aspects of animal welfare. Zeitschrift für Lebensmittel und Untersuchung Forschning A 204: 282–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mochizuki, S and Sato, A 1994 Effects of various killing procedures and storage temperatures on postmortem changes in the muscle of horse mackerel. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 60: 125–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottera, H, Roth, B and Torrissen, O J 2001 Do killing methods affect the quality of Atlantic salmon? In: Kestin S C and Warriss P D (eds) Farmed Fish Quality pp 400–401. Blackwells: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Pastor, A, Huidobro, A, Alvarez, C and Tejada, M 1998 Killing methods affecting quality of chilled whole and gutted gilt head bream. Proceedings of WEFTA ‘98, the 28th Annual Meeting of the Western European Fish Technologists’ Association, 4-7 October, Tromsø, NorwayGoogle Scholar
Robb, D H F 1998 Some factors affecting the flesh quality of salmonids: pigmentation, composition and eating quality. PhD Thesis, University of Bristol, UKGoogle Scholar
Robb, D H F, Wotton, S B, McKinstry, J L, Sørensen, N K and Kestin, S C 2000a Commercial slaughter methods used on Atlantic salmon: determination of the onset of brain failure by electroencephalography. Veterinary Record 147: 298–303CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robb, D H F, Kestin, S C and Warriss, P D 2000b Muscle activity at slaughter. I. Changes in flesh colour and gaping in rainbow trout. Aquaculture 182: 261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robb D, Kestin S and Lines J 2000c The development of electrical stunning of rainbow trout. Poster presentation at Aquaculture 2000 Conference, 16-17 April, Scottish Exhibition Centre, Glasgow, UKGoogle Scholar
Robb, D H F 2001a The relationship between killing methods and quality. In: Kestin, S C and Warriss, P D (eds) Farmed Fish Quality pp 220–233. Blackwells: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Robb, D H F 2001b Humane slaughter. In: Leonard, S (ed) Proceedings of the British Trout Farming Conference pp 57–64. 5-7 September, Sparsholt College, Hampshire, UK. Sparsholt College: Hampshire, UKGoogle Scholar
Robb, D H F, O'Callaghan, M, Lines, J A and Kestin, S C 2002 Electrical stunning of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): factors that affect stun duration. Aquaculture 205: 359–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, B, Torrissen, O J and Slinde, E 2001 The effect of slaughtering procedures on bleeding in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). In: Kestin, S C and Warriss, P D (eds) Farmed Fish Quality pp 405–406. Blackwells: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Sharber, N G, Carothers, S W, Sharber, J P, de Vos, J C Jr and House, D A 1994 Reducing eleetrofishing induced injury of rainbow trout. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 14: 340–3462.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, C 2001 Can invertebrates suffer? Or, how robust is argument-by-analogy? Animal Welfare 10: S103–S118Google Scholar
Skjervold, P O, Fjæra, S V, Østby, P B and Einen, O 2001 Live-chilling and crowding stress before slaughter of Atlantic salmon. Aquaculture 192: 265–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, G 2001 Problems of seabass and sea bream quality in the Mediterranean. In: Kestin, S C and Warriss, P D (eds) Farmed Fish Quality pp 120–128. Blackwells: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Verheijen, F J and Flight, W F G 1997 Decapitation and brining: experimental tests show that after these commercial methods for slaughtering eel Anguilla anguilla (L.), death is not instantaneous. Aquaculture Research 28: 361–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Vis, J W, Oehlenschläger, J, Kuhlmann, H, Münkner, W, Robb, D H F and Schelvis-Smit, A A M 2001 Effect of the commercial and experimental slaughter of eels (Anguilla anguilla) on quality and welfare. In: Kestin, S C and Warriss, P D (eds) Farmed Fish Quality pp 234–248. Blackwells: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Wall, A J 2001 Ethical considerations in the handling and slaughter of farmed fish. In: Kestin, S C and Warriss, P D (eds) Farmed Fish Quality pp 108–115. Blackwells: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Wardle, C 1997 Welfare of farmed salmon and impact on post harvest quality. In: Robb D (ed) Minutes of Workshop: Welfare of Fish at Slaughter. 4 March, University of Bristol, UKGoogle Scholar
Warriss, P D 1998 The welfare of slaughter pigs during transport. Animal Welfare 7: 365–381Google Scholar
Warriss, P D 2000 Meat Science: An Introductory Text. CAB International: Wallingford, Oxon, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warriss, P D and Wotton, S B 1981 Effect of cardiac arrest on exsanguination in pigs. Research in Veterinary Science 31: 82–86CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warriss, P D and Wilkins, L J 1986 Exsanguination of meat animals. Proceedings of CEC Seminar, June, Brussels, pp 150–158Google Scholar
Warriss, P D, Brown, S N, Edwards, J E and Knowles, T G 1998 Effect of lairage time on levels of stress and meat quality in pigs. Animal Science 66: 255–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, J 1994 Animal Welfare: A Cool Eye Towards Eden. Blackwells: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, L J and Gregory, N G 1985 Causes of carcass condemnation at a poultry abattoir. Animal Production 40: 573Google Scholar