Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T07:18:55.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The welfare of culled dairy cattle sent to market and its impact on economic return

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

K Rosen
Affiliation:
The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
P Llonch*
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain
FM Langford
Affiliation:
The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Scotland's Rural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence: pol.llonch@uab.cat

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the welfare of culled dairy cattle sent to an auction in the UK and identify associations between animal-based measurement and economic gain. The population of cull dairy cows sold at a Scottish livestock market were assessed on ten occasions for measures including body condition, mobility, hair loss and lesions, swelling, body cleanliness, claw conformation and total time in pre-sale pens. Details on breed, age, breeding status, farm, weight and price were gathered from market reports and cattle passports. Questionnaires sent to farms gathered information on reason for culling, retirement period (a finishing period to improve body condition), and number of lactations, among other variables. Measures such as bodyweight, breeding status, and breed type influenced price paid, with heifers and larger animals receiving higher prices. A negative effect over price paid was due to reduced mobility and hair loss scores, suggesting that some animal-based indicators of compromised welfare may be associated with a lower economic return from the cows sent to market. No influence of retirement length on price paid was noted. Reason for culling also did not influence price paid, but considering the association found between welfare and price paid, this suggests that the farmers’ reason for culling may not be necessarily revealed by the visual appearance of the cow. This study reveals reasons for culling and quantifies the welfare of dairy cows at market and demonstrates how measures of breeding status and body size, as well as measures of welfare, influence the buyers’ decisions and prices paid at auction.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2020 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2015a Body Condition Scoring (WWW Document). AHDB: UK. https://dairy.ahdb.org.uk/resources-library/technical-information/health-welfare/body-condition-scoring/#.XSMzxOszbIUGoogle Scholar
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2015b Hair loss and lesions score card (WWW Document). AHDB: UK. https://dairy.ahdb.org.uk/resources-library/technical-information/health-welfare/hair-loss-and-lesions-score-card/#.XSMzHuszbIUGoogle Scholar
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2015c Swelling score card (WWW Document). AHDB: UK. https://dairy.ahdb.org.uk/resources-library/technical-information/health-welfare/swelling-score-card/#.XSM0G-szbIUGoogle Scholar
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2015d Cleanliness score card (WWW Document). AHDB: UK. https://ahdb.org.uk/knowledge-library/cleanliness-scorecardGoogle Scholar
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2015e Mobility score - instructions laminate (WWW Document). AHDB: UK. https://ahdb.org.uk/news/stamping-out-lameness-keeps-cows-on-the-moveGoogle Scholar
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2015f Deadweight cattle prices by region (WWW document). https://ahdb.org.uk/beef/gb-deadweight-cattle-prices-by-regionGoogle Scholar
Ahola, JK, Faster, HA, Vanoverbeke, DL, Jensen, ICS, Wilson, RL, Glaze, TB, Fife, TE, Gray, CW, Nash, SA, Panting, RR and Rimbey, NR 2011 Quality defects in market beef and dairy cows and bulls sold through livestock auction mar-kets in the Western United States: Its relative effects on selling price. Journal of Animal Science 89: 14841495. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3171CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Apple, JK 1999 Influence of Body Condition Score on live and carcass value of cull beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 77: 26102620. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.77102610xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, Z, Leach, K, Vishay, H, Bell, N and Main, D 2010 Assessment of lameness prevalence and associated risk factors in dairy herds in England and Wales. Journal of Dairy Science 93: 932941. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2309CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barlowska, J and Florek, M 2006 Slaughter value of heifers, cows and young bulls from commercial beef production in the central-eastern region of Poland. Animal Science Papers and Reports 24: 187194Google Scholar
Bascom, SS and Young, AJ 1998 A summary of the reasons why farmers cull cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 22992305. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75810-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bazzoli, I, De Maivhi, M, Cecchinato, A, Berry, DP and Bittante, G 2014 Factors associated with age at slaughter and carcass weight, price, and value of dairy cull cows. Journal of Dairy Science 97: 10821091. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-6578Google ScholarPubMed
Beaudeau, F, Henken, A, Fourichon, C, Frankena, K and Seegers, H 1993 Associations between health disorders and culling of dairy cows: a review. Livestock Production Science 35: 213236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(93)90094-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, MJ, Wall, E, Russell, G, Roberts, DJ and Simm, G 2010 Risk factors for culling in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. Veterinary Record 167: 238240. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.c4267CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, N 2009 Lameness control in dairy cattle. Part 2 — Mobility scoring — How do you score? National Animal Disease Information Service. https://www.nadis.org.uk/disease-a-z/cattle/lameness-control-in-dairy-herds/part-2-mobility-scoring-how-do-you-score/Google Scholar
Berry, DP, Macdonald, KA, Penno, JW and Roche, JR 2006 Association between body condition score and live weight in pasture-based Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 73: 487491. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029906002020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brickell, JS, Bourne, N, McGowan, MM and Wathes, DC 2009 Effect of growth and development during the rearing period on the subsequent fertility of nulliparous Holstein-Friesian heifers. Theriogenology 72: 408416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogeno-logy.2009.03.015Google ScholarPubMed
Egger-Danner, C, Nielsen, P, Fiedler, A, Muller, K, Fjeldaas, T, Dopfer, D, Daniel, V, Bergsten, C, Cramer, G, Christen, AM, Stock, KF, Thomas, G, Holzhauer, M, Steiner, A, Clarke, J, Capion, N, Charfeddine, N, Pryce, E, Oakes, E, Burgstaller, J, Heringstad, B, Odeggrd, C and Kofler, J 2015 ICAR Claw Health Atlas. ICAR Technical Series, 18. ICAR: Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
Esslemont, RJ and Kossaibati, MA 1997 Culling in 50 dairy herds in England. Veterinary Record 140: 3640. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.140.2.36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fetrow, J, Nordlund, KV and Norman, HD 2006 Invited review: Culling nomenclature, definitions, and recommendations. Journal of Dairy Science 89: 18961905. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72257-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiems, LO, De Campeneere, S, Van Caelenbergh, W, De Boever, JL and Vanacker, JM 2003 Carcass and meat quality in double-muscled Belgian Blue bulls and cows. Meat Science 63: 345352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00092-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franco, D, Bispo, E, Gonzalez, L, Vazquez, IA and Moreno, T 2009 Effect of finishing and ageing time on quality attributes of loin from the meat of Holstein-Fresian cull cows. Meat Science 83:484491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.06.030CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gröhn, Y, Eicker, S, Ducrocq, V and Herd, J 1998 Effect of dis-eases on the culling of Holstein dairy cows in New York State. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 966978. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75657-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauge, Si, Kielland, C, Ringdal, G, Skjerve, E and Nafstad, O 2012 Factors associated with cattle cleanliness on Norwegian dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 95: 24852496. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4786CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hazel, AR, Heins, BK, Seyjora, AS and Hansen, LB 2014 Production, fertility, survival, and body measurements of Montbeliarde-sired crossbreds compared with pure Holsteins during their first 5 lactations. Journal of Dairy Science 97: 25122525. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7063CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humane Slaughter Association 2016 Animal handling and wel-fare report. https://www.hsa.org.uk/downloads/related-items/lives-tock-markets.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kielland, C, Ruud, LE, Zanelia, AJ and Osteras, O 2009 Prevalence and risk factors for skin lesions on legs of dairy cattle housed in freestalls in Norway. Journal of Dairy Science 92: 54875496. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2293CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landis, J and Koch, G 1977 The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, PY, Huxley, IN, Green, MI, Othman, AR, Pottertori, SL, Brignell, CJ and Kaler, J 2015a Area of hock hair loss in dairy cows: Risk factors and correlation with a categorical scale. Veterinary Journal 203: 205210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.11.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, PY, Huxley, JN, Wiltshire, IA, Green, MJ, Othman, AR and Kaler, J 2015b Unravelling the temporal association between lameness and body condition score in dairy cattle using a multi-state modelling approach. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 118: 370377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.12.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loretz, M, Stephan, R and Zweifel, C 2011 Antibacterial activ-ity of decontamination treatments for cattle hides and beef car-casses. Food Control 22: 347359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.food-cont.2010.09.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minchin, W, Buckley, F, Kenny, DA, Keane, MG and Shallop, L 2009 Prediction of cull cow carcass characteristics from live weight and body condition score measured pre slaughter. Irish Journal Agricultural Food Research 48: 7586Google Scholar
Minchin, W, Buckley, F, Kenny, DA, Monahan, FJ, Shallow, L and O’Donovan, M 2010a An evaluation of over-wintering feeding strategies prior to finishing at pasture for cull dairy cows on live animal performance, carcass and meat quality characteristics. Meat Science 85: 385393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meat-sci.2010.02.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minchin, W, O’Donovan, M, Buckley, F, Kenny, DA and Shallop, L 2010b Development of a decision support tool to eval-uate the financial implications of cull cow finishing under different feeding strategies. Journal of Agricultural Science 148: 433443. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859610000213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorman, AK, Duffield, TF, Godkin, MA, Kelton, DF, Rau, J and Haley, DB 2018 Associations between the general condition of culled dairy cows and selling price at Ontario auction markets. Journal of Dairy Science 101: 1058010588. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, JDW, Nicholson, KL, Frenzel, LL, Maddock, RI, Delmore, RJ Jr, Lawrence, TE, Henning, WR, Pringle, TD, Johnson, DD, Paschal, JC, Cleere, JJ, Carpenter, BB, Machen, RV, Banta, JP, Hale, DS, Griffin, DB and Savell, JW 2013 Survey of transportation procedures, management practices, and health assessment related to quality, quantity, and value for market beef and dairy cows and bulls. Journal of Animal Science 91: 50265036. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6283CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norring, M, Manninen, E, De Passillé, AM, Rushen, J, Munksgaard, L and Saloniemi, H 2008 Effects of sand and straw bedding on the lying behavior, cleanliness, and hoof and hock injuries of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91: 570576. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orpin, PG and Esslemont, RJ 2010 Culling and wastage in dairy herds: an update on incidence and economic impact in dairy heifers in the UK. Cattle Practice 18: 163172Google Scholar
Potterton, SL, Green, MJ, Harris, J, Millar, KM, Whay, HR and Huxley, JN 2011 Risk factors associated with hair loss, ulceration, and swelling at the hock in free stall-housed UK dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 94: 29522963. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-4084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, RH and Burg, PT 1993 Feedlot performance and carcass traits of cull cows fed for slaughter cattle. South Dakota Beef Report 21: 101107. https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/cgi/view-content.cgi?article=1020&context=sd_beefreport_1993Google Scholar
Quality Meat Scotland 2015 Market prices (WWW document). https://www.qmscotland.co.uk/market/pricesGoogle Scholar
Randall, LV, Green, MJ, Chagunda, MGG, Mason, C, Archer, SC, Green, LE and Huxley, JN 2015 Low body condition pre-disposes cattle to lameness: An 8-year study of one dairy herd. Journal of Dairy Science 98: 37663777. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renquist, BJ, Oltjen, JW, Sainz, RD and Calvert, CC 2006 Effects of age on body condition and production parameters of multiparous beef cows. Journal of Animal Science 84: 18901895. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-733CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roche, SM, Renaud, DL, Genore, R, Shock, DA, Bauman, C, Croyle, S, Barkema, HW, Dubuc, J, Keefe, GP and Kelton, DF 2020 Canadian National Dairy Study: Describing Canadian dairy producer practices and perceptions surrounding cull cow management. Journal of Dairy Science 103: 34143421. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17390CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutherford, KMD, Langford, FM, Jack, MC, Sherwood, L, Lawrence, AB and Haskell, MJ 2009 Lameness prevalence and risk factors in organic and non-organic dairy herds in the United Kingdom. Veterinary Journal 180: 95105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.03.015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stojkov, J, von Keyserlingk, MAG, Duffield, T and Fraser, D 2020 Fitness for transport of cull dairy cows at livestock markets. Journal of Dairy Science 103: 26502661. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17454CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stott, AW 1994 The economic advantage of longevity in the dairy cow. Journal of Agricultural Economics 45: 113122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1994.tb00382.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troxel, TR, Gadberry, MS, Cline, S, Foley, J, Ford, G, Urell, D and Wiedower, R 2002 Factors affecting the selling price of replacement and market cows sold at Arkansas Livestock Auctions 1. The Professional Animal Scientist 18: 380386. https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31550-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Arendonk, J 1985 Studies on the replacement policies in dairy cattle II. Optimum policy and influence of changes in production and prices. Livestock Production Science 13: 101121. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(85)90014-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velarde, A and Dalmau, A 2012 Animal welfare assessment at slaughter in Europe: Moving from inputs to outputs. Meat Science 92: 244251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vestergaard, M, Madsen, NT, Bligaard, HB, Bredahl, L, Rasmussen, PT and Andersen, HR 2007 Consequences of two or four months of finishing feeding of culled dry dairy cows on car-cass characteristics and technological and sensory meat quality. Meat Science 76: 635643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.02.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whay, HR, Main, DCJ, Green, LE and Webster, AJF 2003 Assessment if the welfare of dairy cattle using animal-based measure-ments: direct observations and investigation of farm records. Veterinary Record 153: 197202. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.153.7.197Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Rosen et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 61 KB