We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 January 2012
The mound of Kilindir (fig. 1) lies about one kilometre south-west of the station of that name on the railway that runs from Salonika to Constantinople via Seres, Dedeagatch and Adrianople. A small stream called Gyol Ayak issues from the south side of Lake Doiran exactly at the modern village at Doiran station. This stream, after passing through nine kilometres of broken and ravined country, issues into more open ground just by the modern Chiflik which represents the pre-war site of the village of Kilindir.
page 62 note 1 Deer, horses, sheep, goats, pigs, dogs, and foxes were the only animals certainly identified. Marine cockle shells and lacustrine mussels from Lake Doiran indicated two certain sources of food.
page 62 note 2 Archaeologia, vol. lxxiv, 73 ff., and Annals of Arch. & Anthr., xii, 15 ff.
page 63 note 1 The same decoration is found in Argive Minyan ware of the Middle Helladic period; see Blegen, , Korakou, p. 17Google Scholar.
page 64 note 1 No objects of copper were found. A large unworked boulder of magnetite was found at 4·5 m. Whether its magnetic properties were known it is impossible to say.
page 65 note 1 These two incised wares will be distinguished by the terms Early Incised Ware and Advanced Incised Ware.
page 65 note 2 Op. cit., pl. xiv, 7.
page 68 note 1 Archaeologia, vol. lxxiv, 78 ff.
page 68 note 2 Hence my arguments for the Bronze Age character of this deposit lacked the final proof. See Dr. Hall's, remarks in Archaeologia, op. cit., 86Google Scholar , made at the discussion on the paper. The evidence that he asks for has been now provided more than adequately by the Kilindir mound.
page 68 note 3 Op. cit., 82 ff.
page 68 note 4 Annals of Arch, and Anthr., Liverpool, 1925, 27.
page 68 note 5 Rey, , Observations sur les premiers habitats de la Macédoine, pl. xvi, no. 8, xvii, no. 4.Google Scholar Other pieces given in these plates may also belong to this class, but I cannot say with certainty.
page 69 note 1 Archaeologia, vol. lxxiv, 78 ff.
page 69 note 2 Schmidt, , Sammlung Trojanischen Altertümer, p. 2, no. 24, etcGoogle Scholar.
page 69 note 3 Blegen, , Korakou, p. 11, fig. 12Google Scholar.
page 69 note 4 A fragment of an open bowl with a pierced and horizontal lug-handle comes from Mariovo near Prilep. See Kazarow, in Strena Buličiana, p. 10, fig. 4Google Scholar.
page 69 note 5 Wace, and Blegen, , B.S.A. 22, p. 177Google Scholar.
page 70 note 1 A.J.A., i, pp. 321-1.
page 70 note 2 Schliemann, , Tiryns, p. 67Google Scholar ; B.M. Catalogue of Prehistoric Vases (1925), p. 23Google Scholar.
page 70 note 3 Blegen, , Korakou, p. 7Google Scholar.
page 70 note 4 B.M. Cat., p. 28.
page 71 note 1 Archaeologta, vol. lxxiv, 78.
page 71 note 2 Annals of Arch, and Anthr., pl. vii.
page 71 note 3 The Naresh mound (Rey, op. cit., p. 67), which is largely cut away, exhibits three main strata of the type seen at Chauchitsa.
page 71 note 4 B.S.A., xxiv, pp. 1 ff.
page 71 note 5 Annals of Arch. and Anthr., p. 36, n. 4.
