^{page 172 note 1} It is curious that Lincoln is not represented, and Hereford not until 1897.

^{page 173 note 1} Mr. W. P. Blore, the present librarian, writes: ‘Did they come into the hands of Kemp, or Bodley, or the man, whom I remember spending a long time shut up within the hoarding erected round the tomb, while the repairs were carried on for about a year, if I remember right; and who was always a source of great interest to me as a small boy, spending such a long time shut up in that box as he did ?’ It is likely that the late Ralph Griffin is responsible for the present locations of both sets of shields.

^{page 173 note 2} p. 138.

^{page 173 note 3} At the Society of Antiquaries, the others being at Canterbury,

^{page 174 note 1} See Surrey Arch. Soc. iii, 328, and Cat. of British Heraldic Art, Burlington Fine Arts Club, pl. 20.

^{page 176 note 2} See Sussex Arch. Coll. lxxvi, 73. Lord Lumley used the arms thus, on his monument to the last Fitzalan Earls of Arundel.

^{page 176 note 3} Jane: ‘in 32 Eliz. Reginae, it was agreed by the Court of the King's Bench, to be all one with Joan’. Camden's Remains concerning Britain, 1870 p. 102.

^{page 175 note 1} Tierney's History of Arundel (1834), ii. 619.

^{page 175 note 2} For illustration see Sussex Arci. Coll. lxxvi, 73.

^{page 176 note 1} He gives no authority for these statements.