Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T12:09:18.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Awareness of words as phonological entities: The role of literacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Régine Kolinsky*
Affiliation:
Université libre de Bruxelles and Universidade de Lisboa
Luz Cary
Affiliation:
Université libre de Bruxelles and Universidade de Lisboa
José Morais
Affiliation:
Université libre de Bruxelles and Universidade de Lisboa
*
Régine Kolinsky, Laboratoire de Psychologie Expérimentale, Université libre de Bruxelles, Avenue Adolphe Buyl 117, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium

Abstract

Illiterate, unschooled adults were tested on their notions of word length. Experiment 1 showed that only about half of them performed very poorly on a task requiring the production of a long/short word. They were clearly inferior to formerly illiterate, unschooled adults. The illiterate group also broke up neatly into two subgroups, one performing perfectly or very well, the other failing completely or almost completely, when required to match the written and the oral form of long/short words. Similarly, Experiment 2 showed that about half of the illiterates were unable to choose the longest of two names when presented with drawings of objects. The results suggest that learning to read, though not strictly necessary, plays a decisive role in the development of the ability of many individuals to focus on phonological length.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barton, D. (1985). Awareness of language units in adults and children. In Ellis, A. W. (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language. Vol. 1. New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berthoud-Papandropoulou, I. (1978). An experimental study of children's ideas about language. In Levelt, W. J. M., Sinclair, A., & Jarvella, R. J. (Eds.), The child's conception of language. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1986). Children's concept of words. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Content, C., Kolinsky, R., Morais, J., & Bertelson, P. (in preparation). Correlates of speech segmentation skills in kindergartners.Google Scholar
Donaldson, M. (1976). Development of conceptualization. In Hamilton, V. & Vernon, M. D. (Eds.), The development of cognitive processes. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Donaldson, M. (1978). Children's minds. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Francis, H. (1973). Children's experience of reading and notions of units in language. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 43, 1723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Januschek, F., Paprotté, W., & Rodhe, W. (1979a). The growth of metalinguistic knowledge in children. In van de Velde, M. & Vandeweghe, W. (Eds.), Sprachstruktur, Individuum und gesellschaft. Akten des 13. Linguistischen Kolloguiums, Gent, 1978, Vol. 1 (pp. 243254). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Januschek, F., Paprotté, W., & Rodhe, W. (1979b). Zur ontogenese sprachlicher Handlungen. Osnabrucker Beitrage zur Sprachtheorie, 10, 3769.Google Scholar
Lundberg, I., & Tornéus, M. (1978). Nonreaders' awareness of the basic relationship between spoken and written words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 25, 404412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morais, J., Gary, L., Alegria, J., & Bertelson, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition, 7, 323331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morais, J., Bertelson, P., Cary, L., & Alegria, J. (1986). Literacy training and speech segmentation. Cognition, 24, 4564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, D. (1983). Concept of word and phoneme awareness in the beginning reader. Research in the Teaching of English, 17, 359373.Google Scholar
Papandropoulou, I., & Sinclair, H. (1974). What is a word? Experimental study of children's ideas on grammar. Human Development, 17, 241258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1929). The child's conception of the world. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Read, C., Zhang, Y., Nie, H., & Ding, B. (1986). The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic spelling. Cognition, 24, 3144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozin, P., Bressman, B., & Taft, M. (1974). Do children understand the basic relationships between speech and writing? The mow-motorcycle test. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 6, 327334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human learning and memory, 6, 174215.Google ScholarPubMed
Valtin, R. (1984). The development of metalinguistic abilities in children learning to read and write. In Downing, J. & Valtin, R. (Eds.), Language awareness and learning to read. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar