Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:54:14.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The development of vocabulary and morphological awareness: A longitudinal study with college EFL students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2019

Yih-Lin Belinda Jiang*
Affiliation:
Soochow University
Li-Jen Kuo
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
*
*Corresponding author. Email: belindajiang@scu.edu.tw

Abstract

While the relationship between vocabulary, morphological awareness, and reading comprehension has been examined extensively, research on this relationship among adult second language learners has only been explored recently. The present study addresses this gap by examining how adult English as a foreign language learners developed different types of English vocabulary and morphological awareness over the course of one academic year. Participants included 523 college freshmen in Taiwan with varying reading proficiency levels. Results from a series of mixed-measure analyses of variance revealed that (a) even the more proficient college English as a foreign language learners failed to fully grasp morphological principles; (b) the gap in vocabulary between the less skilled readers, the average, and the skilled readers widened significantly over the course of one academic year; (c) the effect of phonological and orthographic changes involved in morphologically complex words differed for the assessment of base meaning, but did not vary across proficiency levels; (d) progress in different aspects of morphological awareness, such as interpreting the meaning of the suffix or identifying the base of a morphologically complex word, varied significantly among readers of different proficiency levels; and (e) suffixes of different parts of speech posed different challenges to learners. Theoretical and pedagogical implications of the findings are discussed.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs for the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, 1–186.Google Scholar
Asgari, A., & Mustapha, G. B. (2011). The type of vocabulary learning strategies used by ESL students in University Putra Malaysia. English Language Teaching, 4, 8490.Google Scholar
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., … Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berninger, V. W. (2001). PAL: Process Assessment of the Learner, test battery for reading and writing. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80, 144179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlisle, J. F., Beeman, M., Davis, L. H., & Spharim, G. (1999). Relationship of metalinguistic capabilities and reading achievement for children who are becoming bilingual. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 459478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, J. F., & Katz, L. A. (2006). Effects of word and morpheme familiarity on reading of derived words. Reading and Writing, 19, 669693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, C. (2005). Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 428449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chou, M. H. (2014). Assessing English vocabulary and enhancing young English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ motivation through games, songs, and stories. Education 3–13, 42, 284297.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006a). Continuity and shallow structures in language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 107126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006b). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Neubauer, K., Sato, M., & Silva, R. (2010). Morphological structure in native and nonnative language processing. Language Learning, 60, 2143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J., Miles, J., & Shevlin, M. (2001). Applying regression and correlation: A guide for students and researchers (p. 272). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (2012). English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, S. H., Kieffer, M. J., & Laroche, A. (2014). The relation between morphological awareness and reading comprehension: Evidence from mediation and longitudinal models. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 432451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrer, E., Shaywitz, B. A., Holahan, J. M., Marchione, K. E., Michaels, R., & Shaywitz, S. E. (2015). Achievement gap in reading is present as early as first grade and persists through adolescence. Journal of Pediatrics, 167, 11211125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, A. E., Liberman, I. Y., & Feldman, L. B. (1995). The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In Feldman, L. B. (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 157188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
George, D., & Mallery, M. (2003). Using SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Goodwin, A. P., & Ahn, S. (2013). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions in English: Effects on literacy outcomes for school-age children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 257285. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2012.689791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, A. P., Petscher, Y., Carlisle, J. F., & Mitchell, A. M. (2017). Exploring the dimensionality of morphological knowledge for adolescent readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 40, 91117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. (1997). Reading and vocabulary development in a second language: A case study. In Coady, J. & Stoller, F. (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 98122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guo, Y., Roehrig, A. D., & Williams, R. S. (2011). The relation of morphological awareness and syntactic awareness to adults’ reading comprehension: Is vocabulary knowledge a mediating variable. Journal of Literacy Research, 43, 159183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, T. (2001). The psychology of language. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hu, C. (2013). Predictors of reading in children with Chinese as a first language: A developmental and cross-linguistic perspective. Reading and Writing, 26, 163187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, M., & Nation, I. S. P. (2000). Vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 23, 403430.Google Scholar
Jeon, E. H. (2012). Oral reading fluency in second language reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24, 186208.Google Scholar
Jiang, Y. B., Kuo, L., & Sonnenburg-Winkler, S. L. (2015). Morphological awareness and reading comprehension: A qualitative study with adult EFL learners. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2, 1826.Google Scholar
Kaiser, J., Retelsdorf, J., Südkamp, A., & Möller, J. (2013). Achievement and engagement: How student characteristics influence teacher judgments. Learning and Instruction, 28, 7384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieffer, M. J., Biancarosa, G., & Mancilla-Martinez, J. (2013). Roles of morphological awareness in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking language minority learners: Exploring partial mediation by vocabulary and reading fluency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 697725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieffer, M. J., & Box, C. D. (2013). Derivational morphological awareness, academic vocabulary, and reading comprehension in linguistically diverse sixth graders. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 168175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2007). Breaking down words to build meaning: Morphology, vocabulary, and reading comprehension in the urban classroom. Reading Teacher, 61, 134144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2010). Morphing into adolescents: Active word learning for English‐language learners and their classmates in middle school. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54, 4756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2012a). Development of morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge in Spanish-speaking language minority learners: A parallel process latent growth curve model. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 2354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2012b). Knowledge of words, knowledge about words. Reading and Writing, 25, 347373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, T. J., Kuo, L. J., Ramírez, G., Wu, S., Ku, Y. M., de Marin, S., & Eslami, Z. (2015). The relationship between bilingual experience and the development of morphological and morpho-syntactic awareness: A cross-linguistic study of classroom discourse. Language Awareness, 24, 332354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (2009). Kucera and Francis word pool. Retrieved from http://memory.psych.upenn.edu/wordpools.phpGoogle Scholar
Kuo, L.-J., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41, 161180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuo, L.-J., Ramirez, G., de Marin, S., Kim, T.-J. & Unal-Gezer, M. (2017). Bilingualism and morphological awareness: A study with general educational and Spanish-English dual language program. Educational Psychology, 37, 94111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lam, K., Chen, X., Geva, E., Luo, Y. C., & Li, H. (2012). The role of morphological awareness in reading achievement among young Chinese-speaking English language learners: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 25, 18471872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leong, C. K. (1999). Phonological and morphological processing in adult students with learning/reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 224238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieber, R. (2015). Introducing morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipka, O., & Siegel, L. S. (2012). The development of reading comprehension skills in children learning English as a second language. Reading & Writing, 25, 18731898. doi: 10.1007/s11145-011-9309-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. G. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests (4th ed.). Itasca, IL: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Malabonga, V., Kenyon, D. M., Carlo, M., August, D., & Louguit, M. (2008). Development of a cognate awareness measure for Spanish-speaking English language learners. Language Testing, 25, 495519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). The number of words in printed school English. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, W. E., Anderson, R. C., Schommer, M., Scott, J. A., & Stallman, A. C. (1989). Morphological families in the internal lexicon. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 263282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, W., & Townsend, D. (2012). Words as tools: Learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 91108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. Language Teacher, 31, 913.Google Scholar
National Reading Panel (US), National Institute of Child Health, & Human Development (US). (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.Google Scholar
O’Neill, E. T., Lavoie, B. F., & Bennett, R. (2003). Trends in the evolution of the public web, 1998–2002; The Fedora Project: An open-source digital object repository management system; State of the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, April 2003; Preservation metadata; How many people search the ERIC database each day? D-Lib Magazine, 9, 110.Google Scholar
Packard, J. L. (2002). Metalinguistic awareness as a critical construct. In Li, W., Gaffney, J. S. & Packard, J. L. (Eds.), Chinese children’s reading acquisition: Theoretical and pedagogical issues (pp. 107111). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Pastizzo, M. J., & Carbone, R. F. (2007). Spoken word frequency counts based on 1.6 million words in American English. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 10251028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 2237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, J. (1998). Validating a test to measure depth of vocabulary knowledge. In Kunnan, A. J. (Ed.), Validation in language assessment (pp. 4160). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sandra, D. (1994). The morphology of the mental lexicon: Internal word structure viewed from psycholinguistic perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 227269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 95, 2643. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01146.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18, 5588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tighe, E. L., & Binder, K. S. (2015). An investigation of morphological awareness and processing in adults with low literacy. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 245273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tighe, E. L., & Schatschneider, C. (2014). Examining the relationships of component reading skills to reading comprehension in struggling adult reading: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 395409. doi: 10.1177/0022219414555415CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tighe, E. L., & Schatschneider, C. (2015). Exploring the dimensionality of morphological awareness and its relations to vocabulary knowledge in adult basic education students. Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 293311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tighe, E. L., & Schatschneider, C. (2016). A quantile regression approach to understanding the relations among morphological awareness, vocabulary, and reading comprehension in adult basic education students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 424436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
To, N. L., Tighe, E. L., & Binder, K. S. (2016). Investigating morphological awareness and the processing of transparent and opaque words in adults with low literacy skills and in skilled readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 39, 171188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, S., & Chang, A. C. S. (2015). How does prior word knowledge affect vocabulary learning progress in an extensive reading program? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 651675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, T. S., & Cervetti, G. N. (2017). A systematic review of the research on vocabulary instruction that impacts text comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 52, 203226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, D., & Koda, K. (2012). Contribution of morphological awareness and lexical inferencing ability to L2 vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension among advanced EFL learners: Testing direct and indirect effects. Reading and Writing, 25, 11951216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, D., & Koda, K. (2013). Morphological awareness and reading comprehension in a foreign language: A study of young Chinese EFL learners. System, 41, 901913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, D., & Koda, K. (2014). Awareness of derivation and compounding in Chinese–English biliteracy acquisition. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 17, 5573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., McBride-Chang, C., Wong, A. M. Y., Tardif, T., Shu, H., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Longitudinal correlates of reading comprehension difficulties in Chinese children. Reading and Writing, 27, 481501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar