Bidelman, Gavin M. 2017. The Frequency-Following Response.
Quar, Tian Kar Soli, Sigfrid D Chan, Yin Fang Ishak, Wan Syafira and Abdul Wahat, Nor Haniza 2017. The effect of non-native and non-regional speech testing on a multi-lingual population. International Journal of Audiology, Vol. 56, Issue. 2, p. 92.
Lucks Mendel, Lisa and Widner, Hannah 2016. Speech perception in noise for bilingual listeners with normal hearing. International Journal of Audiology, Vol. 55, Issue. 2, p. 126.
Masuda, Hinako 2016. Misperception patterns of American English consonants by Japanese listeners in reverberant and noisy environments. Speech Communication, Vol. 79, p. 74.
Ouzia, Julia and Filippi, Roberto 2016. Cognitive Control and Consequences of Multilingualism.
Peng, Z. Ellen and Wang, Lily M. 2016. Effects of noise, reverberation and foreign accent on native and non-native listeners' performance of English speech comprehension. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 139, Issue. 5, p. 2772.
Phillips, Natalie A. 2016. The Implications of Cognitive Aging for Listening and the Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL). Ear and Hearing, Vol. 37, p. 44S.
Reetzke, Rachel Lam, Boji Pak-Wing Xie, Zilong Sheng, Li Chandrasekaran, Bharath and Elmer, Stefan 2016. Effect of Simultaneous Bilingualism on Speech Intelligibility across Different Masker Types, Modalities, and Signal-to-Noise Ratios in School-Age Children. PLOS ONE, Vol. 11, Issue. 12, p. e0168048.
Schmidtke, Jens 2016. The Bilingual Disadvantage in Speech Understanding in Noise Is Likely a Frequency Effect Related to Reduced Language Exposure. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7,
Wang, Ruiming Fan, Xiaoyue Liu, Cong and Cai, Zhenguang G. 2016. Cognitive control and word recognition speed influence the Stroop effect in bilinguals. International Journal of Psychology, Vol. 51, Issue. 2, p. 93.
Bidelman, Gavin M. and Dexter, Lauren 2015. Bilinguals at the “cocktail party”: Dissociable neural activity in auditory–linguistic brain regions reveals neurobiological basis for nonnative listeners’ speech-in-noise recognition deficits. Brain and Language, Vol. 143, p. 32.
Heinrich, Antje Henshaw, Helen and Ferguson, Melanie A. 2015. The relationship of speech intelligibility with hearing sensitivity, cognition, and perceived hearing difficulties varies for different speech perception tests. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6,
Kraus, Nina and White-Schwoch, Travis 2015. Unraveling the Biology of Auditory Learning: A Cognitive–Sensorimotor–Reward Framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 19, Issue. 11, p. 642.
Mishra, Ramesh Kumar 2015. Listening through the native tongue: A review essay on Cutler'sNative listening: Language experience and the recognition of spoken words. Philosophical Psychology, Vol. 28, Issue. 7, p. 1064.
Shi, Lu-Feng 2015. English word frequency and recognition in bilinguals: Inter-corpus comparison and error analysis. International Journal of Audiology, Vol. 54, Issue. 10, p. 674.
Slater, Jessica Skoe, Erika Strait, Dana L. O’Connell, Samantha Thompson, Elaine and Kraus, Nina 2015. Music training improves speech-in-noise perception: Longitudinal evidence from a community-based music program. Behavioural Brain Research, Vol. 291, p. 244.
Xu, Ke Soli, Sigfrid D. Zheng, Yun Liu, Shixi Li, Gang Tao, Yong and Meng, Zhaoli 2015. Quantification of the effects of Mandarin dialect differences on the use of norm-referenced speech perception tests. International Journal of Audiology, Vol. 54, Issue. 7, p. 461.
Zhou, Xiaoqing Yuan, Wei Galvin, John J. Fu, Qian-Jie and Zhang, Ying 2015. Influence of language experience on digit recognition by English and Chinese listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 138, Issue. 3, p. EL324.
Gilbert, Rachael C. Chandrasekaran, Bharath and Smiljanic, Rajka 2014. Recognition memory in noise for speech of varying intelligibility. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 135, Issue. 1, p. 389.
Gor, Kira 2014. Raspberry, not a car: context predictability and a phonological advantage in early and late learnersâ€™ processing of speech in noise. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 5,
This study compared monosyllabic word recognition in quiet, noise, and noise with reverberation for 15 monolingual American English speakers and 12 Spanish–English bilinguals who had learned English prior to 6 years of age and spoke English without a noticeable foreign accent. Significantly poorer word recognition scores were obtained for the bilingual listeners than for the monolingual listeners under conditions of noise and noise with reverberation, but not in quiet. Although bilinguals with little or no foreign accent in their second language are often assumed by their peers, or their clinicians in the case of hearing loss, to be identical in perceptual abilities to monolinguals, the present data suggest that they may have greater difficulty in recognizing words in noisy or reverberant listening environments.
This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.