Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:49:15.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inigo Jones’s roof structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2016

David Yeomans
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When Inigo Jones introduced Italian architectural ideas into Britain, he also brought a new kind of roof structure that facilitated the construction of large scale spaces. The unsupported ceilings of the Banqueting House and St Paul’s, Covent Garden, were both over 50 ft and although similar spans had been built before, they had relied upon quite different structural methods which created a distinct architecture. The roofs of Westminster Hall and those of many lesser halls, like those at the Oxford and Cambridge colleges, used either arch or hammer-beam forms whose open structures dominated the rooms. These structures were quite unsuited to providing flat ceilings or roofs which, when required, had relied upon massive tie beams. Instead of this rather crude structural method, Inigo Jones supported his flat ceilings and roofs by using the much more efficient trussed roofs which were in use in Italy at the time and were shown in the drawings of Palladio and Serlio. These structures allowed large spans to be constructed with timbers of smaller scantling, particularly for the tie beam which no longer needed to carry the full weight of the roof and which no longer needed to be built in a single length. It might be argued that the use of this new structural form was essential to the development of the new classical style of architecture in England but, although he was the first architect to use it on any scale in Britain, the influence of Inigo Jones on its subsequent use and development is questionable because of the interruption to building by the Civil War and the re-discovery of the form by others thereafter.

Type
Research Article
Information
Architectural History , Volume 29 , 1986 , pp. 85 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Palladio, Andrea, I Quattro Libri dell’Architettura (Venice, 1601), 11, 42 Google Scholar.

2 Allsop, Bruce, Inigo Jones on Palladio (Newcastle upon Tyne, 1970)Google Scholar. The annotations on sizes of beams are in I Quattro Libri, IV, 19, 25, 33, 45 and 131.

3 I Quattro Libri, IV, 20.

4 Reproduced by Parsons, W. B. in Engineers and Engineering in the Renaissance (London, 1976), 486-87Google Scholar.

5 I Quattro Libri, IV, 15.

6 Baldi, Bernardino, in Mechanica Aristotalis Problematica Exercitationes (Mainz, 1621), 102-03Google Scholar.

7 SirWotton, Henry, The Elements of Architecture (London, 1624), 79 Google Scholar.

8 Barbaro, Daniello, I Dieci Libri dell’Architettura di M. Vitruvio (Venice, 1552), 168 Google Scholar. Jones’s annotated copy is at Chatsworth.

9 Ibid., 168.

10 For a description of French king-post roofs see Meirion-Jones, Gwyn I., ‘The vernacular architecture of France: an assessment’, Vernacular Architecture, 16 (1985), 1–17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 For the regional distribution of traditional English king-post roofs see Mercer, Eric, English Vernacular Houses (London, 1975), 109 Google Scholar.

12 Reproduced by Hill, Oliver and Comforth, J. in English Country Houses: Caroline 1625-1685 (London, 1966), 75 Google Scholar.

13 Campbell, Colen, Vitruvius Brittanicus (London, 1715), 1, pl. 5 Google Scholar.

14 Kent, William, Designs oflnigoJones (London, 1727), 51 Google Scholar.

15 Devonshire Collection, Chatsworth, album 8, John Webb, The Original Designs for Whitehall,. 6, sheet numbered 51.

16 Nicholson, Peter, Practical Carpentry, Joinery and Cabinet Making (London, 1826), pl. 20 Google Scholar. The drawing is by M. A. Nicholson.

17 Ibid.

18 PRO Works 4/5.

19 PRO Works 6/15/172.

20 PRO Works 6/15/258.

21 RBA Smythson Collection 1/14.

22 Field, H. and Bunney, M., English domestic architecture of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries (London, 1905), 15 Google Scholar.

23 Worcester College Collection, Gotch 15.

24 Langley, Batty, Ancient Masonry (London, 1736), 11, pl. 44 Google Scholar.

25 RIBA drawings collection, E5/25.

26 Colen Campbell, op cit., ii, pl. 20.

27 The Survey of London, 36 (London, 1970), 104-07.

28 PRO SP 16/402/75 dated 30 November 1638.

29 Thejudgement given on 24 May 1639 (PRO SP 16/421/150-3), rejected many of the parishioners’ claims.

30 Westminster Public Library H802 fol. 105.

31 Ibid., fol. 110.

32 Westminster Public Library H913.

33 DoE Photographic Collection.

34 Wren Society, 6 (Oxford, 1929), 59.

35 Worcester College Collection, Gotch 1 58k verso.

36 Ibid., G 17c.

37 Ware, Isaac in Designs of Inigo Jones and others (London, 1757)Google Scholar, reproduced a design purportedly by Inigojones for a circular theatre which also had a king-post truss.

38 These and subsequent drawings by Webb, referred to here, are all in the Worcester College Collection.

39 William Kent, op. cit., 28, 40, 43, 46 and 47.

40 Margaret Whinney, ‘Some Church Designs by John Webb’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 6, 14, suggests that one of these (Worcester College Collection 1, 42) was probably intended for publication.

41 Yeomans, David, ‘Structural Understanding in the Eighteenth Century: James Essex and the Roof of Lincoln Cathedral Chapter House’, Design Studies, 5, No. 1 (January 1984), 41–48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.