Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T02:04:04.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Insurance and the natural hazards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

D. G. Friedman
D. G. Friedman*
Affiliation:
The Travelers Insurance Company, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Natural hazards—floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, windstorms and hailstorms—cause considerable property damage in various parts of the world. In the United States, average annual damage resulting from these hazards is increasing rapidly. A large percentage of the damages occur as a result of infrequent, but severe, geophysical events (individual storms or earthquakes). If aggregate damage resulting from the event is exceptionally large, the event is called a natural disaster. The number of natural disasters in the United States is increasing each year. Resultant property losses are increasing even more rapidly. Increased density of properties susceptible to damage, increased value of these properties, and increased cost of repair have raised the probability of natural disaster occurrence in recent years even though the magnitude and character of the natural hazards have not changed.

Insurance is one means of protection against the natural hazards for fixed property. In this report, one-to-four family dwelling structures represent fixed property. To provide protection, two components of risk must be evaluated: (1) risk per individual structure and (2) risk of a large number of simultaneous losses—catastrophe potential. The latter component has attained added importance recently with the increased number and magnitude of natural disasters.

Information available for risk evaluation is (1) past damage experience; (2) data on the damage susceptibility of structures to be insured and the cost of repair; and (3) knowledge of physical characteristics of the natural hazards from the natural sciences. Damage experience results from the interaction of a natural hazard (frequency, location and severity of a geophysical event—storm, earthquake or flood) with characteristics and geographical distribution of exposed properties. Occasionally, interaction between the geophysical event and the distribution of properties leads to the creation of catastrophic losses resulting in a natural disaster. Evaluation of risk must be based either upon a retrospective or prospective measure of this damage experience.

Past damage experience, a retrospective measure of loss potential, is a poor measure of future risk because of (1) non-stationarity of property characteristics; (2) bias introduced by chance interactions of hazard and property array; and (3) by random occurrence (or non-occurrence) of a severe geophysical event during the short sampling period of years that is usually available for study. A pure extrapolation into the future of past loss experience, including the chance combinations of events that led to past natural disasters, does not provide a great amount of insight into the character of future risk. What is needed is not actual damage that occurred as a result of past geophysical events, but damage resulting to the present distribution of properties from a recurrence of these past events. For example, to estimate future earthquake risk in California, emphasis should not be on what the 1906 San Francisco earthquake cost, but what it would cost if a comparable earthquake occurred today and affected the present type, distribution, and value of properties.

A supplementary approach to the use of loss experience (called Natural Hazard Simulation) is presented which provides a prospective measure of risk. A mathematical approximation of the natural hazard mechanism is constructed which artificially produces geophysical events that mathematically interact with a given geographical array of properties. Natural Hazard Simulation utilizes and ties together available pertinent information. Use of an electronic computer permits calculation of a large number of, say, 25-year sequences of synthetic loss experience which can be used to estimate the two measures of natural hazard risk. “Natural disasters” occur at irregular intervals in the simulation analysis when a severe geophysical event occurs near a center of population.

Using this approach, effects of a recurrence of past geophysical events or simulated future events upon present or hypothetical future distributions and types of properties can be estimated. It produces, in effect, a weighted measure of the many possible interactions between natural hazard and property array which, because of his short life span, man cannot afford to wait for nature to produce. Characteristics of an insurance operation needed to cover the hazard (rating, underwriting, claim settlement, loss reserving, and reinsurance) also are simulated.

Examples of the application of Natural Hazard Simulation to flood, earthquake, hurricane wind and tides, winter windstorm, and thunderstormspawned hazards (such as tornadoes, wind and hail hazard) are presented. Purpose of the application to flood hazard was to (1) estimate magnitude of the hazard to more than fifty-million dwelling structures in the United States for which very little damage experience was available and (2) determine characteristics of a joint Insurance Industry/Federal Government flood insurance program need to cover the hazard. Characteristics of a joint program were needed to establish relationships and financial arrangements between the Federal Government and the Insurance Industry. This work was done as consultants to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development during development of a National Flood Insurance Program which is now operational. In this plan, the Federal Government assumes a portion of risk by acting as a reinsurer against excessive losses on industry's share of the Program.

An application of Natural Hazard Simulation to the earthquake hazard on the West Coast of the United States has been made. Examples of mathematically produced earthshock patterns are given. Correspondence between calculated and observed patterns is good. Measures of both components of risk are discussed for the present array of 625,000 dwellings in the San Francisco Metropolitan area when a recurrence of all earthquakes in the historical past (170 years) is used as a measure of earthquake hazard. A similar type of analysis also has been made for the Los Angeles Metropolitan area.

An application of the approach to the hurricane wind hazard is illustrated using computer printouts of the geographical pattern of highest wind expected during a hurricane's passage as obtained from the computerized mathematical model. Calculated patterns of wind speed severity provide realistic approximations of observed patterns. An example of the interaction between natural hazard and property array in producing a “natural disaster” is illustrated by calculating “loss experience” to dwelling properties in Louisiana from an intense hurricane whose path is successively changed relative to centers of population. The effect of changing the intensity of a hurricane upon resulting damage when the path is held constant is also shown. Both measures of hurricane wind risk—expected loss per exposure and catastrophe potential—are being estimated by developing “loss experience” to the present array of dwelling properties in the Gulf and Atlantic States based upon two measures of the magnitude of the hurricane wind hazard; namely, (1) a recurrence of hurricanes of various intensities and paths which have been recorded in the historical past and (2) a number of series of 25-year sequences of “synthetic loss experience” based upon computer simulation techniques.

An application of Natural Hazard Simulation to winter windstorm and thunderstorm-spawned tornadoes, wind, and hail in the Middle Western United States has been carried out for the first measure of risk. The mathematical model for obtaining a measure of catastrophe potential for these hazards is currently being developed. Future applications will include development of an integrated procedure for simulating “loss experience” from all of the natural hazards to a given array of structures in various geographical areas.

Natural hazard simulation offers a supplementary approach to the sole use of past loss experience for (1) estimating the two components of natural hazard risk and (2) developing characteristics of an insurance program needed to cover the natural hazards at a time when average annual property damages caused by natural hazards are increasing rapidly because of the increased number and magnitude of natural disasters.

Type
Research Article
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , December 1972 , pp. 4 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 1972

References

[1]Dacy, D. C. and Kunreuther, H. (1969) “The Economics of Natural Disasters—Implications for Federal Policy, The Free Press, a division of the MacMillan Company, New York, 270 pages.Google Scholar
[2]Maunder, W. J. (1970) “The Value of the Weather, Methuen & Co. Ltd., London, 388 pages.Google Scholar
[3]Hendrick, R. L. and Friedman, D. G. (1965) “Potential Impacts of Storm Modification on the Insurance Industry” In: Sewell, W.R.D. e.d., Human Dimensions of Weather Modification, University of Chicago, Dept. of Geography, Research Paper No. 105, pages 227–46.Google Scholar
[4]Friedman, D. G. and Shortell, P. A. (1967) “Prospective Weather Hazard Rating in the Midwest” Research Department, The Travelers Insurance Company, Hartford, Conn., unpublished report, 94 pages.Google Scholar
[5]Friedman, D. G. (1965) “Texas Hailstorms”, Research Department, The Travelers Insurance Company, Hartford, Conn., unpublished report, 464 pages.Google Scholar
[6]Friedman, D. G. and Kong, P. (1966) “Hurricane Hazard to Commercial Properties in Louisiana”, Research Department, The Travelers Insurance Company, Hartford, Conn., unpublished report, 96 pages.Google Scholar
[7]Friedman, D. G. (1965) “The Flood Damage Problem as it Relates to Dwelling Properties in the United States of America” (prepared for the information of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners Flood and Hurricane Committee and the National All-Industry Flood Insurance Committee), Research Department, The Travelers Insurance Company, Hartford, Conn., 134 pages.Google Scholar
[8]Friedman, D. G. and Roy, T. S. (1966) “Simulation of Total Flood Loss Experience of Dwellings on Inland and Coastal Flood Plains”, report prepared as a consultant to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, D.C. Appendix H-5 of United States Senate Committee on Banking and Currencies “Insurance and Other Programs for Financial Assistance to Flood Victims”, September, 1966.Google Scholar
[9]Schaake, J. C. and Fiering, M. B. (1967) “Simulation of a National Flood Insurance Fund”, Department of Bioenvironmental Engineering, Engineering and Industrial Experiment Stations, University of Florida, Gainesville, 61 pages (report prepared for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development).Google Scholar
[10]Friedman, D. G. (1970) “Computer Simulation of the Earthquake Hazard” in Conference Proceedings of Geologic Hazards and Public Problems, May 27-28, 1969, sponsored by the Office of Emergency Preparedness, Executive Office of The President, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., pages 153–181.Google Scholar
[11]Richter, C. F. (1959), “Seismic Regionalization” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 49, pages 123–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]National Research Council (1969), Seismology—Responsibilities and Requirements of a Growing Science, Part 1, Summary and Recommendadations, 38 pages; Part 2, Problems and Prospects, 58 pages; National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
[13]National Academy of Engineering (1969) “Earthquake Engineering Research, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 313 pages.Google Scholar
[14]Housner, G. W. (1967) “Earthquakes and Earthquake Insurance” paper presented at Environmental Science Services Agency, Jan. 30-31, 1967, Washington, D.C. (unpublished).Google Scholar
[15]Algermissen, S. T. (1969) “Seismic Risk Map for Conterminous United States” Coast and Geodetic Survey, presented at Fourth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile, January, 1969.Google Scholar
[16]Friedman, D. G. (1966) “The Hurricane Hazard in Louisiana”, Research Department, The Travelers Insurance Company, Hartford, Conn, unpublished report, 42 pages.Google Scholar
[17]Friedman, D. G. (1966) “The Hurricane Hazard in Mississippi”, Research Department, The Travelers Insurance Company, Hartford, Conn, unpublished report, 28 pages.Google Scholar
[18]Kong, P. and Shortell, P. A. (1968) “Damage to Residential and Commercial Properties from a Recurrence of the 1938 Hurricane in New England”, Research Department, The Travelers Insurance Company, Hartford, Conn., unpublished report, 103 pages.Google Scholar
[19]Friedman, D. G. and Light, G. (1966) “Hurricanes and Their Loss Potential” National Underwriter, International Insurance—Reinsurance Review, The National Underwriter, Vol. 70, No. 49, Dec. 9, 1966, pages 40–42.Google Scholar
[20]Friedman, D. G. (1961) “The Use of Climatological Probabilities as an Aid in Making Extended Coverage Rate Level Adjustments”, Research Department, The Travelers Insurance Company, Hartford, Conn., unpublished report, 23 pages.Google Scholar
[21]Friedman, D. G. (1964) “Frequency of Hurricane Winds in Various Sections of the Gulf States Compared With Frequencies in the South Atlantic States” Research Department, The Travelers Insurance Company, Hartford, Conn., unpublished report, 46 pages.Google Scholar
[22]Environmental science services Administration, (1970) “Project Stormfury 1970” U.S. Department of Commerce, Rockville, Maryland, July 1970, 15 pages.Google Scholar