Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T17:02:29.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nature and Human Nature — Two Perspectives - The Philosophical Foundations of Ecological Civilization: A Manifesto for the Future Arran Gare, Abingdon, Oxon/New York, Routledge, 2017 - Autonomous Nature: Problems of Prediction and Control From Ancient Times to the Scientific Revolution Carolyn Merchant, New York, Routledge, 2016

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2018

Annette Gough*
Affiliation:
School of Education, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. London: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388128Google Scholar
Code, M. (2017). Review of The philosophical foundations of ecological civilization: A manifesto for the future. Environmental Philosophy, 13, 299302. https://doi.org/10.5840/envirophil201613240Google Scholar
Gare, A. (1995). Postmodernism and the environmental crisis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gare, A. (2010). Toward an ecological civilization: The science, ethics, and politics of eco-poiesis. Process Studies, 39, 538. https://doi.org/10.5840/process20103912Google Scholar
Gare, A. (2017). The philosophical foundations of ecological civilization: A manifesto for the future. Abingdon, Oxon and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gough, A. (1997). Education and the environment: Policy, trends and the problems of marginalisation. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hayles, K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology and the scientific revolution. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Merchant, C. (1992). Radical ecology: The search for a livable world. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merchant, C. (1996). Earthcare: Women and the environment. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merchant, C. (2003). Reinventing Eden: The fate of nature in Western culture. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merchant, C. (2016). Autonomous nature: Problems of prediction and control from ancient times to the scientific revolution. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Park, K. (2006). Women, gender, and utopia: The death of nature and the historiography of early modern science. Isis, 97, 487495. https://doi.org/10.1086/508078Google Scholar
Soper, K. (1995). What is Nature? Culture, politics, and the non-human. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Warren, K.J. (2015). Feminist environmental philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-environmental/Google Scholar
Worsham, L., & Olson, G. (Eds.). (2008). Plugged in: Technology, rhetoric, and culture in a posthuman age. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar