Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Hersh, Deborah Godecke, Erin Armstrong, Elizabeth Ciccone, Natalie and Bernhardt, Julie 2016. “Ward talk”: Nurses’ interaction with people with and without aphasia in the very early period poststroke. Aphasiology, Vol. 30, Issue. 5, p. 609.


    Rose, Miranda Ferguson, Alison Power, Emma Togher, Leanne and Worrall, Linda 2014. Aphasia rehabilitation in Australia: Current practices, challenges and future directions. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Vol. 16, Issue. 2, p. 169.


    Savage, Meghan C. Donovan, Neila J. and Hoffman, Paul R. 2014. Preliminary results from conversation therapy in two cases of Aphasia. Aphasiology, Vol. 28, Issue. 5, p. 616.


    Simmons-Mackie, Nina Savage, Meghan C. and Worrall, Linda 2014. Conversation therapy for aphasia: a qualitative review of the literature. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, Vol. 49, Issue. 5, p. 511.


    Armstrong, Elizabeth Ferguson, Alison and Mortensen, Lynne 2011. Discourses of Deficit.


    Croot, Karen Nickels, Lyndsey Laurence, Felicity and Manning, Margaret 2009. Impairment‐ and activity/participation‐directed interventions in progressive language impairment: Clinical and theoretical issues. Aphasiology, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 125.


    Lind, Marianne Kristoffersen, Kristian Emil Moen, Inger and Simonsen, Hanne Gram 2009. Semi-spontaneous oral text production: Measurements in clinical practice. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, Vol. 23, Issue. 12, p. 872.


    ×

Everyday Talk: Its Role in Assessment and Treatment for Individuals With Aphasia

  • Elizabeth Armstrong (a1) and Lynne Mortensen (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1375/brim.7.3.175
  • Published online: 01 February 2012
Abstract
Abstract

This article discusses the significance of conversation in current clinical practice with individuals with aphasia and their conversation partners. It explores the nature of everyday talk, and provides an overview of how studies to date have examined the conversations of individuals with aphasia and have provided some promising treatment avenues. It also proposes another framework, Speech Function Analysis, that may assist further in incorporating conversational principles into the therapy context. The framework provides a system network for examining speech functions in dialogue, while considering the effects of both lexical and syntactic limitations, and context. Examples of conversations between three individuals with aphasia and their partners are used to illustrate the analysis. The authors suggest that further knowledge of both aphasic speakers' and their partners' interactions as well as clinician–client interactions may increase our insights into this area, and make authentic and meaningful conversation more accessible in the clinical situation and beyond.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Address for correspondence: Dr E. Armstrong, Department of Linguistics, Building C5A, Macquarie University, North Ryde NSW 2109, Australia.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Brain Impairment
  • ISSN: 1443-9646
  • EISSN: 1839-5252
  • URL: /core/journals/brain-impairment
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×