Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T11:19:27.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early Roman Mosaic Materials in Southern Britain, with Particular Reference to Silchester (Calleva Atrebatum): a Regional Geological Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

J.R.L. Allen  and
M.G. Fulford
J.R.L. Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, School of Human and Environmental Sciences, University of Reading, m.g.fulford@reading.ac.uk, j.r.l.allen@reading.ac.uk
M.G. Fulford
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, School of Human and Environmental Sciences, University of Reading, m.g.fulford@reading.ac.uk, j.r.l.allen@reading.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Mosaics represent one of the best known art forms in the Roman world. Their geometric patterns and designs, their figurative images, and their development through time have been extensively studied, and corpora have been assembled for certain provinces of the Empire. In Britain, the study of the surviving mosaics has led to the identification of certain late Roman ‘schools’ (stylistic groupings) of mosaics on the basis of shared stylistic attributes. Now it will be possible to place this work in a fuller context as the long-awaited corpus of all Roman mosaics known from Britain begins to appear. However, whereas the late mosaics undoubtedly show considerable regional distinctness, the position of the earliest work that pioneered the form in Britain is far less clear, perhaps because mosaics of the first and early second century A.D. are fewer and have excited much less interest.

Type
Articles
Information
Britannia , Volume 35 , November 2004 , pp. 9 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © J.R.L. Allen and M.G. Fulford 2007. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Allen, J.R.L., and Fulford, M.G. 1996: ‘The distribution of South-East Dorset Category I pottery in South-West Britain’, Britannia 27, 223–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkell, W.J. 1947: The Geology of the Country around Weymouth, Swanage, Corfe and Lulworth, Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Great Britain, LondonGoogle Scholar
Bidwell, P.T. 1979: The Legionary Bath-house and Basilica and Forum at Exeter, Exeter Archaeological Reports 1, ExeterGoogle Scholar
Boon, G.C. 1974: Silchester. The Roman Town of Calleva, Newton AbbotGoogle Scholar
Boon, G.C. 1986: ‘The design of the Backhall Street mosaic’, in Zienkiewicz, 1986, 273–6Google Scholar
Brewer, R.J. 2002: The Second Augustan Legion and the Roman Military Machine, CardiffGoogle Scholar
Brigham, T. 2001a: ‘Excavations at Plantation Place, London’, Association for Roman Archaeology 10, 8–10Google Scholar
Brigham, T. 2001b: in MOLAS 2001. Annual Review for 2000, London, 26–7Google Scholar
Buckland, W., and De la Beche, H.T. 1835: ‘On the geology of the neighbourhood of Weymouth and the adjacent parts of the coast of Dorset’, Trans. Geol. Soc. (2)4, 1–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, A., and Fulford, M.G. 2002: ‘The excavation of Insula IX, Silchester: the first five years of the “Town Life” project, 1997–2001’, Britannia 33, 129–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, C.K., and Wignall, P.B. 1988: ‘Early Kimmeridgian bivalves of southern England’, Mesozoic Research 2, 97–149Google Scholar
Cole, D.I. 1974: ‘Observations on a burning cliff’, Proc. Dorset Nat. Hist, and Archaeol. Soc. 96, 16–19Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. 1971a: Excavations at Fishbourne, 1961–9. Volume I: The Site, Society of Antiquaries, Reports of the Research Committee 26, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunliffe, B. 1971b: Excavations at Fishbourne 1961–9. Volume II: The Finds, Society of Antiquaries, Reports of the Research Committee 27, LondonGoogle Scholar
Cunliffe, B. 1973: The Regni, LondonGoogle Scholar
Detsicas, A.P. 1963: ‘Excavations at Eccles, 1962: first interim report’, Arch. Cantiana 78, 125–41Google Scholar
Detsicas, A.P. 1964: ‘Excavations at Eccles, 1963: second interim report’, Arch. Cantiana 79, 121–36Google Scholar
Detsicas, A.P. 1965: ‘Excavations at Eccles, 1964: third interim report’, Arch. Cantiana 80, 69–91Google Scholar
Detsicas, A.P. 1969: ‘Excavations at Eccles, 1968: seventh interim report’, Arch. Cantiana 84, 93–106Google Scholar
Detsicas, A.P. 1977: ‘Excavations at Eccles, 1976: final interim report’, Arch. Cantiana 93, 55–9Google Scholar
Detsicas, A.P. 1987: The Cantiaci, GloucesterGoogle Scholar
Drummond-Murray, J., Thompson, P., and Cowan, C. 2002: Settlement in Roman Southwark. Archaeological Excavations (1991–8) from the London Underground Limited Jubilee Line Extension Project, Museum of London Archaeology Service Monograph 12, LondonGoogle Scholar
Dunbabin, K.M.D. 1999: Mosaics of the Greek and Roman World, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Dunning, G.C. 1949: ‘The Purbeck marble industry in the Roman period’, Archaeological News Letter 1(11), 15Google Scholar
Evans, E. 2000: The Caerleon Canabae: Excavations in the Civil Settlement 1984–90, Britannia Monograph 16, LondonGoogle Scholar
Farrar, R.A.H. 1964: ‘The Romano-British site at Norden, Corfe Castle’, Proc. Dorset Nat. Hist, and Archaeol. Soc. 86, 116–17Google Scholar
Feistner, K.W.A. 1989: ‘Pétrographie examination and re-interpretation of concretionary carbonate horizons from the Kimmeridge Clay, Dorset’, Jour. Geol. Soc. Lond. 146, 345–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, G.E. 1894: ‘Excavations on the site of the Roman city at Silchester, Hants, in 1894’, Archaeologia 54(2), 439–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frere, S.S., and Fulford, M.G. 2002: ‘The collegium peregrinorum at Silchester’, Britannia 33, 167–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallois, R.W. 1998: The Stratigraphy and Well-completion Reports for Swanworth Quarry No. 1 and No. 2 and Metherhills No. 1 Boreholes (RGGE Project), British Geological Survey Technical Report WA/97/91, ExeterGoogle Scholar
Goldring, R., Astin, T.R., Marshall, J.E.A., Gabbott, S., and Jenkins, C.D. 1998: ‘Towards an integrated study of the depositional environment of the Bencliff Grit (Upper Jurassic) of Dorset’, in Underhill, J.R. (ed.), Development, Evolution and Petroleum Geology of the Wessex Basin, Geological Society Special Publication 133, London, 355–72Google Scholar
Hollingworth, N.T. 1991: ‘Gastropods and scaphopods’, in Martill, D.M. and Hudson, J.D. (eds), Fossils of the Oxford Clay, London, 78–85Google Scholar
House, M.R. 1993: Geology of the Dorset Coast (2nd edn), Geologists' Association Guide 22, LondonGoogle Scholar
Johnston, D.E. 1977: ‘The central-southern group of Romano-British mosaics’, in Munby, J. and Henig, M. (eds), Roman Life and Art in Britain, a Celebration in Honour of the Eightieth Birthday of Jocelyn Toynbee, British Archaeology Report 41(i), Oxford, 195–215Google Scholar
Kendal, R. 1996: ‘Transport logistics associated with the building of Hadrian's Wall’, Britannia 27, 129–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, J.K. 2003: Caerleon Roman Fortress, CardiffGoogle Scholar
Lawson, A. 1975: ‘Shale and jet objects from Silchester’, Archaeologia 105, 241–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ling, R. 1997: ‘Mosaics in Roman Britain: discoveries and research since 1945’, Britannia 28, 259–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ling, R. 1998: Ancient Mosaics, LondonGoogle Scholar
Macquaker, J.H.S., and Gawthorpe, R.L. 1993: ‘Mudstone lithofacies in the Kimmeridge Clay Formation, Wessex Basin, southern England: implications for the origin and controls of the distribution of mudstones’, Jour. Seditn. Petrol. 63, 1129–43Google Scholar
Morgans-Bell, H.S., Coe, A.L., Hesselbo, S.P., Jenkyns, H.C., Weedon, G.P., Marshall, J.E.A., Tyson, R.V., and Williams, C.J. 2001: ‘Integrated stratigraphy of the Kimmeridge Clay Formation (Upper Jurassic) based on exposures and boreholes in south Dorset, U.K.’, Geol. Mag. 138, 511–39Google Scholar
Nash-Williams, V.E. 1931: ‘The Roman legionary fortress at Caerleon in Monmouthshire: report on the excavations carried out in the Prysg field, 1927–9’, Arch. Cambrensis 86, 95–157Google Scholar
Nash-Williams, V.E. 1932: ‘The Roman legionary fortress at Caerleon in Monmouthshire: report on the excavation carried out in the Prysg field, 1927–9’, Arch. Cambrensis 87, 48–104, 265–349Google Scholar
Neal, D.S. 1981: Roman Mosaics in Britain, Britannia Monograph 1, LondonGoogle Scholar
Neal, D.S., and Cosh, S.R. 2002: Roman Mosaics of Britain. Vol. 1. Northern Britain incorporating the Midlands and East Anglia, LondonGoogle Scholar
Peacock, D.P.S., and Williams, D.F. 1995: ‘Ornamental coloured marble in Roman Britain: an interim report’, ASMOSIA IV. Actes de la IVème Conference Internationale, Bordeaux, Bordeaux, 353–7Google Scholar
Perring, D. 1991: Roman London, LondonGoogle Scholar
Perring, D., and Roskams, S., with Allen, P. 1991: Early Development of Roman London West of the Walbrook, The Archaeology of Roman London Vol. 2, LondonGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, F.A. 1986: ‘Ornamental stonework from Roman London’, Britannia, 17, 169–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RCHME (Royal Commission on Historical Monuments, England) 1970: An Inventory of Historical Monuments in the County of Dorset II, South-east, pt 3, LondonGoogle Scholar
Rudkin, D. 1981: ‘Recent discoveries at Fishbourne Roman Palace’, Mosaic 4, 8–10Google Scholar
Scott, L. 1938: ‘The Roman villa at Angmering’, Sussex Archaeol. Coll. 79, 3–44Google Scholar
Scott, L. 1939: ‘Angmering Roman villa. Report on the excavations in 1938’, Sussex Archaeol. Coll. 80, 89–92Google Scholar
Smith, D.J. 1965: ‘Three fourth-century schools of mosaic in Roman Britain’, La mosaïque Greco-romaine, Colloques internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris 1963, Paris, 95–116Google Scholar
Smith, D.J. 1969: ‘The mosaic pavements’, in Rivet, A.L.F. (ed.), The Roman Villa in Britain, London, 71–125Google Scholar
Smith, D.J. 1975: ‘Roman mosaics in Britain before the fourth century’, La mosaïque Greco-romaine, IIe Colloque international pour l'étude de la mosaïque antique, Vienne 1971, Paris, 269–90Google Scholar
Smith, D.J. 1979: ‘Fragments of mosaic from the legionary baths’, in Bidwell, P.T., The Legionary Bath-House and Basilica and Forum at Exeter, Exeter Archaeological Reports 1, Exeter, 132–4Google Scholar
Smith, D.J. 1984: ‘Roman mosaics in Britain: a synthesis’, Colloquio internationale sul mosaico antico, Ravenna 1980, Ravenna, 357–80Google Scholar
St John Hope, W.H., and Fox, G.E. 1896: ‘Excavations on the site of the Roman city at Silchester, Hants, in 1895’, Archaeologia 55, 215–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St John Hope, W.H., and Fox, G.E. 1899: ‘Excavations on the site of the Roman city at Silchester, Hants, in 1898’, Archaeologia 58, 229–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunter, N. 1986: ‘Excavation at Norden’, in Woodward, P.J. (ed.), Romano-British Industries in Purbeck, Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society Monograph 6, Dorchester, 9–43, 180–4Google Scholar
Thomas, C. 1986: ‘The worked stone’, in Woodward, P.J. (ed.), Romano-British Industries in Purbeck, Dorchester Natural History and Archaeological Society Monograph 6, Dorchester, 30–13, 180–4Google Scholar
Wacher, J.S. 1995: The Towns of Roman Britain (rev. edn), LondonGoogle Scholar
Wignall, P.B. 1990: ‘Benthic palaeoecology of the late Jurassic Kimmeridge Clay of England’, Special Papers in Palaeontology 43, 1–74Google Scholar
Williams, D.F. 2002: ‘Purbeck marble in Roman and medieval Britain’, in Hinton, D.A. (ed.), Purbeck Papers, University of Southampton Department of Archaeology Monograph 4, 126–31Google Scholar
Wilson, A.E. 1947: ‘Angmering Roman villa’, Sussex Archaeol. Coll. 86, 1–21Google Scholar
Woodward, R.J. 1986: ‘The excavation of a Late Iron-Age settlement and Romano-British industrial site at Ower, Dorset’, in Woodward, R.J. (ed.), Romano-British Industries in Purbeck, Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society Monograph 6, Dorchester, 44–124, 180–4Google Scholar
Zienkiewicz, J.D. 1986: The Legionary Fortress Baths at Caerleon, CardiffGoogle Scholar