Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T21:43:48.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hadrian's Wall: The Limiting Ditches in the Cardurnock Peninsula

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

Richard Bellhouse
Affiliation:
16 Lyf's Lane, Kempsey, Worcester

Extract

The great wall of Hadrian comes to an end at Bowness-on-Solway at a large fort on high ground commanding the narrowest part of the Solway Firth. In the first phase of construction a curtain of laid turf was planned and executed from the River Irthing to Bowness, and there is a hint, from the fortlets and towers of the Cumberland coast, that provision had been made for the turf curtain to continue beyond Bowness. The change of plan that brought the garrisons of the Stanegate frontier forts forward to new forts on the Wall also moved the garrison in the fort at Kirkbride to a new fort at Bowness and added the fort at Beckfoot to the coastal system at the position of Tower 14B. The units in the coastal watch and patrol system comprised stone-built towers and turf and timber fortlets, the fortlets being quite accurately set out close to the shore-line at intervals of one Roman mile, each mile being divided into three parts by two towers.

Type
Articles
Information
Britannia , Volume 12 , November 1981 , pp. 135 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Richard Bellhouse 1981. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Page 239 note 8 should be Trans. Cumbd. Westmd. Antiq. Arch. Soc. (=CW), n.s., v and last line on page 241 must be 0·65 m, not cm. Page 238, the location of test (a) is not north-west of Biglands mile-fortlet, it is north-east. The location of test (b) is not clear; the text (page 239) refers to a section cut at Ny 191608, said to be 250 m east of Campfield; it is 250 m south-west of Campfield. This point is further described as being 60 m north-east of Tower 2B, but, on page 238, the location is ‘some 40 m north-west of Tower 2B’. Confusion of direction appears in the text figures. In fig. 2. the section should be SE–NW, in fig. 4. it should be W–E, not N–S.

2 CW, 2, lxix (1969), 100.Google Scholar

3 ibid., 65 f.

4 Britannia viii (1977), 154 f.Google Scholar

5 CW, 2, lxx (1970), pl. iii facing p. 21.Google Scholar

6 ibid, liv (1954), 51 f.

7 ibid, lxix (1969), 55 f.

8 ibid., 80 for the use of front, back, left and right in the description of towers and fortlets.

9 ibid, lxii (1962), 67.

10 ibid, lxx (1970), 10 f., 36.

11 ibid, lvii (1957), 22 f.

12 ibid, liv (1954), 22 f.

13 ibid., 42 f.

14 ibid, lxx (1970), 21 f.

15 JRS lix (1969), 106, 165 and fig. 18.Google Scholar

16 Britannia viii (1977), 167.Google Scholar

17 CW Extra Series Volume xxii.

18 CW, 2, lxx (1970), 4047.Google Scholar

19 Britannia viii (1977), 377.Google Scholar

20 Report forthcoming in CW, 2.

21 Britannia ix (1978), 423 f.Google Scholar

22 Britannia x (1979), 283 f.Google Scholar