Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T10:36:44.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Neronian Stamped Tile from Little London, Near Silchester*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

Jillian Greenaway
Affiliation:
The Cottage, Sucks Lane, Ashampstead Common, Pangbourne

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
Britannia , Volume 12 , November 1981 , pp. 290 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © Jillian Greenaway 1981. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

14 Antiq. Journ. vi (1926), 75Google Scholar; Berks. Bucks. Oxon Arch. Journ. xxx (1926), 78–9Google Scholar; JRS xv (1925), 243, 250.Google Scholar

15 Procs. Hants. Field Club xv (19411943), 244, no. 33.Google Scholar

16 ibid., xvi (1944–47), 59.

17 ibid., facing p. 59.

18 G. C. Boon, Silchester, The Roman Town of Calleva (1974), 278–9.

19 Boon, op. cit. (note 18), 364 note 29.

20 Not four-petalled as Boon, op. cit. (note 18), 63, fig. 7, no. 1.

21 O.S. Record Card 65NW9.

22 A. W. G. Lowther, A Study of Patterns on Roman Flue Tiles and their Distribution (1948).

23 Britannia x (1979), 227–42.Google Scholar

24 ibid., 243–54.

25 In H. P. R. Finberg, The Agrarian History of England and Wales (1967), 29.

26 op. cit. (note 18), 44.

27 Archaeologia cii (1969), 14.Google Scholar

28 ibid., 13–14, trench J(b).

29 ibid., 6, trench B.

30 The argument for the contemporaneity of the Roman roads is weak. The Portway is clearly later than the Inner Earthwork; the road to Winchester and Chichester is not aligned on the south entrance of the Inner Earthwork; no excavation has taken place at the West Entrance to test its relationship with the Roman road to the West; the position of the East entrance is inferred, not proved.

31 Tacitus, Agricola xiv.

32 Antiquity xxii (1948), 172 ff.Google Scholar