Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-vpzxz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-09-08T09:03:49.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Local Factions Pressure Parties: Activist Groups and Primary Contests in the Tea Party Era

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2023

Rachel M. Blum Open the ORCID record for Rachel M. Blum [Opens in a new window]  and
Mike Cowburn Open the ORCID record for Mike Cowburn [Opens in a new window]
Rachel M. Blum
Affiliation:
Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center and the Department of Political Science, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma, US
Mike Cowburn*
Affiliation:
European New School of Digital Studies, European University Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder), Brandenburg, Germany
*
*Corresponding author. Email: cowburn@europa-uni.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The contemporary Republican Party has been the site of asymmetric partisan entrenchment and factional infighting. We test whether factional pressure from a far-right faction (the Tea Party) exacerbated the party's rightward movement with a granular analysis of Republican factionalism at the congressional district level. We develop a measure of local factionalism using novel datasets of activist presence and primary contests. Then, we conduct a difference-in-differences analysis to assess whether local factionalism in the Tea Party era heightened Republican partisanship and legislative extremism at the district level. We find that districts that experienced factional pressure moved rightward on both measures. These findings help clarify how the Tea Party captured the Republican Party and support a focus on the role of party factions in fomenting partisan conflict.

Keywords

party factionsTea PartyUS party primariespolitical activismdifference-in-differences

Information

Type
Article
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , January 2024 , pp. 88 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abadie, A (2005) Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators. The Review of Economic Studies 72(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, M and McDonald, M (2015) Redistricting and polarization. In Thurber, JA and Yoshinaka, A (eds), American Gridlock. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arceneaux, K, Johnson, M, and Murphy, C (2012) Polarized political communication, oppositional media hostility, and selective exposure. The Journal of Politics 74(1), 174–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research 46(3), 399–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Austin, PC and Stuart, EA (2015) Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Statistics in Medicine 34(28), 3661–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, MA, Mummolo, J, and Noel, H (2012) Tea party influence: A story of activists and elites. American Politics Research 40(5), 769–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, AO, Hassell, HJG and Heseltine, M (2020) Be careful what you wish for: The impacts of President Trump's midterm endorsements. Legislative Studies Quarterly 46(2), 459–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendix, W and Mackay, J (2017) Partisan infighting among House Republicans: Leaders, factions, and networks of interests. Legislative Studies Quarterly 42(4), 549–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, M, Duflo, E, and Mullainathan, S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(1), 249–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch Rubin, R (2017) Building the Bloc: Intraparty Organization in the U.S. Congress. Cambridge, New York; Port Melbourne; Delhi; Singapore: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, RM (2020) How the Tea Party Captured the GOP: Insurgent Factions in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, RM and Cowburn, M (2023) “Replication Data for: How Local Factions Pressure Parties: ‘Activist Groups and Primary Contests in the Tea Party Era’”. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/YPVYZO, Harvard Dataverse, V1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boatright, RG (2013) Getting Primaried: The Changing Politics of Congressional Primary Challenges. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boatright, RG (2014) Congressional Primary Elections. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, DW, Han, H, and Pope, JC (2007) Primary elections and candidate ideology: Out of step with the primary electorate? Legislative Studies Quarterly 32(1), 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broockman, DE and Butler, DM (2017) The causal effects of elite position-taking on voter attitudes: Field experiments with elite communication. American Journal of Political Science 61(1), 208–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broockman, DE et al. (2021) Why local party leaders don't support nominating centrists. British Journal of Political Science 51(2), 724–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmines, EG and Stimson, JA (1989) Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmines, EG and Woods, J (2002) The role of party activists in the evolution of the abortion issue. Political Behavior 24(4), 361–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, JL, Engstrom, EJ, and Roberts, JM (2007) Candidate quality, the personal vote, and the incumbency advantage in Congress. The American Political Science Review 101(2), 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, AJ (2020) Party Sub-brands and American party factions. American Journal of Political Science 64(3), 452–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M et al. (2016) Party versus faction in the reformed presidential nominating system. PS: Political Science & Politics 49(4), 701–8.Google Scholar
Cowburn, M (2022) Partisan Polarization in Congressional Nominations: How Ideological & Factional Primaries Influence Candidate Positions (Doctoral Thesis). Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
Cowburn, M and Kerr, R (2023) Inclusivity and decentralisation of candidate selectorates: Factional consequences for centre-left parties in England, Germany, and the United States. Political Research Quarterly 76(1), 292–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowburn, M and Knüpfer, CB (2023) The emerging fault line of alternative news: Intra-party division in republican representatives’ media engagement. Party Politics. doi: 10.1177/1354068823115757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, GW and Katz, JN (2002) Elbridge Gerry's Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crespin, MH (2005) Using geographic information systems to measure district change, 2000–2002. Political Analysis 13(3), 253–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowder-Meyer, M (2013) Gendered recruitment without trying: How local party recruiters affect women's representation. Politics & Gender 9(4), 390–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daily Kos (2016) Daily Kos Elections 2008, 2012 & 2016 Presidential Election Results for Congressional Districts Used in 2016 Elections. Daily Kos. Available from https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VfkHtzBTP5gf4jAu8tcVQgsBJ1IDvXEHjuMqYlOgYbA/edit?usp=embed_facebook (accessed 12 October 2022).Google Scholar
Desai, RJ and Franklin, JM (2019) Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: A primer for practitioners. BMJ 367, l5657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiSalvo, D (2012) Engines of Change: Party Factions in American Politics, 1868–2010. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominguez, CBK (2011) Does the party matter? Endorsements in congressional primaries. Political Research Quarterly 64(3), 534–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, JN, Peterson, E, and Slothuus, R (2013) How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. The American Political Science Review 107(1), 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enos, RD and Hersh, ED (2015) Party activists as campaign advertisers: The ground campaign as a principal-agent problem. The American Political Science Review 109(2), 252–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, A et al. (2007) Rich state, poor state, red state, blue state: What's the matter with Connecticut? Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2, 345–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervais, BT and Morris, IL (2018) Reactionary Republicanism: How the Tea Party in the House Paved the Way for Trump's Victory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gramlich, J (2020) What the 2020 Electorate Looks Like by Party, Race and Ethnicity, Age, Education and Religion. Pew Research Center. Available from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/10/26/what-the-2020-electorate-looks-like-by-party-race-and-ethnicity-age-education-and-religion/ (accessed 10 June 2021).Google Scholar
Grossmann, M and Dominguez, CBK (2009) Party coalitions and interest group networks. American Politics Research 37(5), 767–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, JS and Pierson, P (2006) Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, AB and Snyder, JM (2015) Candidate Ideology and Electoral Success. Working Paper. Available from https://www.andrewbenjaminhall.com/Hall_Snyder_Ideology.pdf (accessed 20 July 2021)Google Scholar
Hassell, HJG (2018) The Party's Primary: Control of Congressional Nominations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heckman, JJ, Ichimura, H, and Todd, PE (1997) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies 64(4), 605–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirano, S et al. (2010) Primary elections and partisan polarization in the U.S. Congress. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 5(2), 169–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, TM and McClurg, SD (2005) The mobilization of core supporters: Campaigns, turnout, and electoral composition in United States presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science 49(4), 689–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, DJ (2018) The Increasingly United States: How and Why American Political Behavior Nationalized. Chicago, IL; University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute for Research & Education on Human Rights (2022) Breaching the Mainstream: A National Survey of Far-Right Membership in State Legislatures. Institute for Research & Education on Human Rights. Available from https://www.irehr.org/reports/breaching-the-mainstream/# (accessed 31 October 2022).Google Scholar
Jardina, A (2019) White Identity Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewitt, CE and Treul, SA (2014) Competitive primaries and party division in congressional elections. Electoral Studies 35, 140–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamarck, EC (2014) The Primaries Project: Understanding American Parties and Factions. Brookings. Available from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2014/09/30/the-primaries-project-understanding-american-parties-and-factions/ (accessed 1 September 2018).Google Scholar
Kamarck, EC and Podkul, AR (2018) The 2018 Primaries Project: What Are the Internal Divisions within Each Party? Brookings. Available from https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-2018-primaries-project-what-are-the-internal-divisions-within-each-party/ (accessed 19 March 2021).Google Scholar
Koger, G, Masket, S, and Noel, H (2009) Partisan webs: Information exchange and party networks. British Journal of Political Science 39(3), 633–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layman, GC and Carsey, TM (2002) Party polarization and ‘conflict extension’ in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science 46(4), 786–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layman, GC et al. (2010) Activists and conflict extension in American party politics. The American Political Science Review 104(2), 324–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lechner, M, Rodriguez-Planas, N, and Fernández Kranz, D (2016). Difference-in-difference estimation by FE and OLS when there is panel non-response. Journal of Applied Statistics 43(11), 2044–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, JB, et al. (2021) Voteview: Congressional Roll-Call Votes Database. Voteview. Available from https://voteview.com/.Google Scholar
Manento, C (2019) Party crashers: Interest groups as a latent threat to party networks in congressional primaries. Party Politics 27(1), 137–148.Google Scholar
Masket, S (2009) No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masket, S (2020) Learning From Loss: The Democrats, 2016–2020. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, L (2018) Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, L and Manza, J (2011) Class differences in social and political attitudes in the United States. The Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 552–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, N, Poole, KT, and Rosenthal, H (2006) Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Medvic, SK (2021) Gerrymandering: The Politics of Redistricting in the United States. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Miler, KC (2009) The limitations of heuristics for political elites. Political Psychology 30(6), 863–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Missouri Census Data Center (2014) Geocorr 2014. Available from mcdc.missouri.edu/applications/geocorr2014.html (accessed 10 June 2021).Google Scholar
Montgomery, DH (2022) Data and Code for CityLab Projects. Available from https://github.com/theatlantic/citylab-data/blob/0beaad41b66587898e6256f1d95a5a3e27b561ef/citylab-congress/methodology.md (accessed 3 October 2022).Google Scholar
Noel, H (2016) Ideological factions in the Republican and Democratic parties. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 667(1), 166–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nokken, TP and Poole, KT (2004) Congressional party defection in American history. Legislative Studies Quarterly 29(4), 545–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, CS and Barreto, MA (2014) Change They Can't Believe In Change They Can't Believe In. Princeton University Press. Available from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781400852314/html (accessed 23 March 2021).Google Scholar
Poole, KT and Rosenthal, H (1985) A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. American Journal of Political Science 29(2), 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, M (2013) Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science 16(1), 101–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, PR (2012) Design of Observational Studies. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, PR and Rubin, DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, SM, Hunt, C, and Essel, K (2022) Growing Tea with subnational roots: Tea party affiliation, factionalism, and GOP politics in state legislatures. American Politics Research 50(2), 242–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, DB (2007) The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: Parallels with the design of randomized trials. Statistics in Medicine 26(1), 20–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saldin, RP and Teles, SM (2020) Never Trump. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sant'Anna, PHC and Zhao, JB (2020) Doubly robust difference-in-differences estimators. Journal of Econometrics 219(1), 101–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlozman, D and Rosenfeld, S (2019) The hollow parties. In Lee, FE and McCarty, N (eds), Can America Govern Itself? SSRC Anxieties of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 120–52. Available from https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/can-america-govern-itself/hollow-parties/D894D4E4EF6D44132E99D640B041AFCD (accessed 11 March 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoen, D (2021) The Progressive Takeover of Democratic Party Continues. TheHill. Available from https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/544222-the-progressive-takeover-of-democratic-party-continues (accessed 24 June 2021).Google Scholar
Skocpol, T and Tervo, C (eds) (2020) Upending American Politics: Polarizing Parties, Ideological Elites, and Citizen Activists From the Tea Party to the Anti-Trump Resistance. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, T and Tervo, C (eds) (2021) The Tea Party and the Resistance: No, They're Not the Same. Democracy: A Journal of Ideas. Available from democracyjournal.org/arguments/the-tea-party-and-the-resistance-no-theyre-not-the-same/.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T and Williamson, V (2012) The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, EA et al. (2014) Using propensity scores in difference-in-differences models to estimate the effects of a policy change. Health services & outcomes research methodology 14(4), 166–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarrow, S (2021) Movements and Parties: Critical Connections in American Political Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theriault, SM (2006) Party polarization in the US Congress: Member replacement and member adaptation. Party Politics 12(4), 483–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theriault, SM (2008) Party Polarization in Congress. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theriault, SM (2013) The Gingrich Senators: The Roots of Partisan Warfare in Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, DM (2017) Joining patterns across party factions in the US Congress. The Forum 15(4), 741–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, CE (2011) ‘We're losing our country’: Barack Obama, race & the tea party. Daedalus 140(1), 125–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehner, P (2019) The Democratic Party Is Radicalizing. The Atlantic. Available from https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/04/progressivism-making-democrats/586372/ (accessed 24 June 2021).Google Scholar
Willer, R, Feinberg, M, and Wetts, R (2016) Threats to Racial Status Promote Tea Party Support Among White Americans. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. SSRN Scholarly Paper. Available from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2770186 (accessed 10 June 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zippel, C et al. (2022) GETCENSUS: Stata Module to Load American Community Survey Data from the U.S. Census Bureau API into Stata. Available from https://econpapers.repec.org/software/bocbocode/s459008.htm (accessed 20 October 2022).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Blum and Cowburn supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 834 KB
Supplementary material: File

Blum_and_Cowburn_Dataset

Dataset

Download Blum_and_Cowburn_Dataset(File)
File