Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The British Academy Brian Barry Prize Essay Justifying Public Funding for Science

  • Zeynep Pamuk (a1)
Abstract

Public funding for science is increasingly coming under attack. This article explores the normative force of these charges, and the arguments that are available to counter them. It examines two justifications of state support for science: Vannevar Bush’s vision of the universal material benefits of scientists pursuing basic research and John Rawls’s liberal justification of science funding as a voluntary public good. It argues that both accounts neglect the important political impact of scientific research and its status as the source of knowledge for the modern state. The article then traces the implications of the political role of science for the appropriate forms of democratic input into funding decisions.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The British Academy Brian Barry Prize Essay Justifying Public Funding for Science
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The British Academy Brian Barry Prize Essay Justifying Public Funding for Science
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The British Academy Brian Barry Prize Essay Justifying Public Funding for Science
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email: zeynep.pamuk@politics.ox.ac.uk
References
Hide All
Avin, S (in press) Centralized funding and epistemic exploration. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. doi:10.1093/bjps/axx059
Barry, B (1991) Is democracy special? In Barry B (ed.), Democracy and Power: Essays in Political Theory Part 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 2460.
Barry, B (1995) Justice as Impartiality: A Treatise on Social Justice, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brighouse, H (1995) Neutrality, publicity, and state funding of the arts. Philosophy & Public Affairs 24 (1), 3563.
Broad, W (2014) Billionaires with big ideas are privatizing science. The New York Times, 15 March. Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/16/science/billionaires-with-big-ideas-are-privatizing-american-science.html?_r=0, accessed 14 August 2018.
Bush, V (1960 [1945]) Science: The Endless Frontier. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
Carroll, N (1987) Can government funding of the arts be justified theoretically? Journal of Aesthetic Education 21 (1), 2135.
Collini, S (2012) What Are Universities For? London: Penguin Books.
Dewey, J (1927) The Public and its Problems. Chicago, IL: The Swallow Press.
Douglas, H (2009) Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh, PA: The University of Pittsburgh Press.
Dupré, J (2004) Science and values and values in science. Inquiry, 47, 505514.
Dworkin, R (1985) A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Feinberg, J (1994) Not with my tax money: the problem of justifying government subsidies for the arts. Public Affairs Quarterly 8 (2), 101123.
Fox News (2011) Your tax dollars at work: shrimp on treadmills, 26 May. Available at http://www.video.foxnews.com/v/960953334001/?#sp=show-clips, accessed 14 August 2018.
Fox News (2013) Was duck penis study an appropriate use of taxpayer money? 25 March. Available at http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/03/25/was-duck-penis-study-appropriate-use-taxpayer-money.html, accessed 14 August 2018.
Goodin, R (2012) Excused by the unwillingness of others? Analysis, 72 (1), 1824.
Greenberg, D (2007) Science for Sale. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Greenfieldboyce, N (2011) ‘Shrimp on a treadmill’: the politics of ‘silly’ studies. Available at https://www.npr.org/2011/08/23/139852035/shrimp-on-a-treadmill-the-politics-of-silly-studies, accessed 14 August 2018.
Hayek, FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review 35 (4), 519530.
Kevles, DJ (1995 [1978]) The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
King, D (1997) Creating a funding regime for social research in Britain: the Heyworth Committee on Social Studies and the founding of the Social Science Research Council. Minerva 35, 126.
Kitcher, P (2001) Science, Truth, and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kleinman, DL (1995) Politics on the Endless Frontier: Postwar Research Policy in the United States. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Kuhn, TS (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Larsen, ON (1992) Milestones and Millstones: Social Science at the National Science Foundation, 1945-1991. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Mann, AK (2000) For Better or For Worse: The Marriage of Science and Government in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.
Miller, D (2004) Justice, democracy and public goods. In Dowding K, Goodin R and Pateman C (eds), Justice and Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 127149.
Munoz‐Dardé, V (2013) In the face of austerity: the puzzle of museums and universities. Journal of Political Philosophy 21 (2), 221242.
Nicholson, JM Ioannidis, JP (2012) Research grants: conform and be funded. Nature 492 (7427), 34.
Nozick, R (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Harper and Row.
Nussbaum, M (2016) Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton, NJ: Public Square.
Polanyi, M (1941a) The growth of thought in society. Economica 8 (32), 428456.
Polanyi, M (1941b) Cultural significance of science. Nature 147 (3717), 119.
Polanyi, M (1945a) The autonomy of science. The Scientific Monthly 60 (2), 141150.
Polanyi, M (1945b) The planning of science. The Political Quarterly 16 (4), 316328.
Polanyi, M (1951) The Logic of Liberty: Reflections and Rejoinders. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Polanyi, M (1962) The republic of science: its political and economic theory. Minerva 1 (1), 5473.
Rawls, J (1955) Two concepts of rules. The Philosophical Review 64 (1), 332.
Rawls, J (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J (1996) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rawls, J (2001) Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rice, D King, L (2017) Trump’s budget proposal ‘savages’ climate research, scientists say. USA Today, 23 May. Available at https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2017/05/23/trumps-budget-proposal-savages-climate-research-scientists-say/102062556/, accessed 14 August 2018.
Sarewitz, D (2010) Normal science and limits on knowledge: what we seek to know, what we choose not to know, what we don’t bother knowing. Social Research 77 (3), 9971010.
Savage, JD (1999) Funding Science in America: Congress, Universities, and the Politics of the Academic Pork Barrel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schattschneider, EE (1960) The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America . New York: Holt, Rinehalt and Winston.
Scholnick, D (2014) How a $47 shrimp treadmill became a $3-million political plaything. Available at https://www.chronicle.com/blogs/conversation/2014/11/13/how-a-47-shrimp-treadmill-became-a-3-million-political-plaything, accessed 14 August 2018.
Tuck, R (2008) Free Riding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Waldman, S (2017) Trump administration seeks big budget cuts for climate research. Available at https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/trump-administration-seeks-big-budget-cuts-for-climate-research, accessed 14 August 2018.
Wicksell, K (1958) A new principle of just taxation. In Musgrave R and Peacock A (eds), Classics in the Theory of Public Finance. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 72118.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed