Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

A Comparative Study of the Effects of Electoral Institutions on Campaigns

  • Laura Sudulich and Siim Trumm

Abstract

A long tradition of studies in political science has unveiled the effects of electoral institutions on party systems and parliamentary representation. Yet their effects on campaign activities remain overlooked. Research in this tradition still lacks a strong comparative element able to explore the nuanced role of electoral institutions in shaping individual-level campaigns during first-order parliamentary elections. This study uses data from a variety of national candidate studies to address this lacuna, and shows that the structure of electoral institutions affects the electoral mobilization efforts put in place by candidates. Candidate-centred electoral systems incentivize more intense and complex mobilization efforts, and shift the campaign focus towards individuals rather than parties. By directly addressing the effects of electoral institutions on campaign behaviour, this study contributes to the wider debate on their role in promoting political engagement and mobilization. These results indicate that electoral institutions affect political competition much more than previously thought.

Copyright

Footnotes

Hide All
*

School of Politics and International Relations, University of Kent (email: l.sudulich@kent.ac.uk); School of Politics and International Relations, University of Nottingham (email: siim.trumm@nottingham.ac.uk). Data replication sets are available at http://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/BJPolS and online appendices are available at https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123416000570.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Ai, Chunrong, and Norton, Edward C.. 2003. Interaction Terms in Logit and Probit Models. Economics Letters 80:123129.
Alvarez, Michael, and Sinclair, Betsy. 2012. Electoral Institutions and Legislative Behaviour: The Effects of Primary Processes. Political Research Quarterly 63:544557.
Benoit, Kenneth. 2002. The Endogeneity Problem in Electoral Studies: A Critical Re-Examination of Duverger’s Mechanical Effect. Electoral Studies 21:3546.
Benoit, Kenneth, and Laver, Michael. 2007. Estimating Party Policy Positions: Comparing Expert Surveys and Hand-Coded Content Analysis. Electoral Studies 26:90107.
Bowler, Shaun, and Farrell, David. 1992. The Study of Election Campaigning. In Electoral Strategies and Political Marketing, edited by Shaun Bowler and David Farrell, 123. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Bowler, Shaun, and Farrell, David. 2011. Electoral Institutions and Campaigning in Comparative Perspective: Electioneering in European Parliament Elections. European Journal of Political Research 50:668688.
Carey, John. 2007. Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting. American Journal of Political Science 51:92107.
Carey, John, and Shugart, Matthew. 1995. Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas. Electoral Studies 14:417439.
Colomer, Josep M. 2011. Personal Representation: The Neglected Dimension of Electoral Systems. Colchester: ECPR Press.
Cox, Gary. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dalton, Russell. 2008. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Farrell, David. 2006. Political Parties in a Changing Campaign Environment. In Handbook of Party Politics, edited by Richard Katz and William Crotty, 122133. London: Sage.
Farrell, David. 2011. Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Farrell, David, and Webb, Paul. 2000. Political Parties as Campaign Organizations. In Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, edited by Richard Dalton and Martin Wattenberg, 102128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Farrell, David, and Scully, Roger. 2007. Representing Europe’s Citizens? Electoral Institutions and the Failure of Parliamentary Representation in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Farrell, David, and Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger. 2002. Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums. London: Routledge.
Fauvelle-Aymar, Christine, and Lewis-Beck, Michael. 2008. TR Versus PR: Effects of the French Double Ballot. Electoral Studies 27:400406.
Fieldhouse, Edward, and Cutts, David. 2009. The Effectiveness of Local Party Campaigns in 2005: Combining Evidence from Campaign Spending and Agent Survey Data. British Journal of Political Science 39:367388.
Gallagher, Michael, and Mitchell, Paul. 2005. The Politics of Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibson, Rachel, and McAllister, Ian. 2006. Does Cyber-Campaigning Win Votes? Online Communication in the 2004 Australian Election. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 16:243263.
Giebler, Heiko, and Wüst, Andreas. 2011. Campaigning on an Upper Level? Individual Campaigning in the 2009 European Parliament Elections in its Determinants. Electoral Studies 30:5366.
Górecki, Maciej A., and Marsh, Michael. 2012. Not Just ‘Friends and Neighbours’: Canvassing, Geographic Proximity and Voter Choice. European Journal of Political Research 51:563582.
Górecki, Maciej A., and Marsh, Michael. 2014. A Decline of ‘Friends and Neighbours Voting’ in Ireland? Local Candidate Effects in the 2011 Irish ‘Earthquake Election’. Political Geography 41:1120.
Green, Donald P., and Gerber, Alan S.. 2008. Get Out The Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
Green, Donald P., Aronow, Peter M., and McGrath, Mary C.. 2013. Field Experiments and the Study of Voter Turnout. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 23:2748.
Karp, Jeffrey, Vowles, Jack, Banducci, Susan, and Donovan, Todd. 2002. Strategic Voting, Party Activity, and Candidate Effects: Testing Explanations for Split Voting in New Zealand’s New Mixed System. Electoral Studies 21:122.
Karp, Jeffrey, and Banducci, Susan. 2007. Party Mobilization and Political Participation in New and Old Democracies. Party Politics 13:217234.
Karp, Jeffrey, Banducci, Susan, and Bowler, Shaun. 2008. Getting Out the Vote: Party Mobilization in a Comparative Perspective. British Journal of Political Science 38:91112.
Kreft, Ita. 1996. Are Multilevel Techniques Necessary? An Overview, Including Simulation Studies. Los Angeles: California State University.
Marsh, Michael. 2000. Candidate Centered But Party Wrapped: Campaigning in Ireland Under STV. In Elections in Australia, Ireland and Malta Under the Single Transferable Vote, edited by Shaun Bowler and Bernard Grofman, 114130. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
McAllister, Ian. 2002. Calculating or Capricious? The New Politics of Late Deciding Voters. In Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums, edited by David Farrell and Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, 2240. London: Routledge.
Nickerson, David W., Friedrichs, Ryan D., and King, David C.. 2006. Partisan Mobilization Campaigns in the Field: Results from a Statewide Turnout Experiment in Michigan. Political Research Quarterly 59:8597.
Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, Pippa, and Inglehart, Ronald. 2001. Cultural Obstacles to Equal Representation. Journal of Democracy 12:126140.
Norton, Edward C., Wang, Hua, and Ai, Chunrong. 2004. Computing Interaction Effects and Standard Errors in Logit and Probit Models. Stata Journal 4:154167.
Olivella, Santiago, and Tavits, Margit. 2014. Legislative Effects and Electoral Mandates. British Journal of Political Science 44:301321.
Shugart, Matthew. 2001. ‘Electoral Efficiency’ and the Move to Mixed-Member Systems. Electoral Studies 20:173193.
Taagepera, Rein, and Shugart, Matthew. 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Wüst, Andreas M., Schmitt, Hermann, Gschwend, Thomas, and Zittel, Thomas. 2006. Candidates in the 2005 Bundestag Election: Mode of Candidacy, Campaigning and Issues. German Politics 15:420438.
Zittel, Thomas. 2009. Lost in Technology? Political Parties and the Online Campaigns of Constituency Candidates in Germany’s Mixed Member Electoral System. Journal of Information Technology and Politics 6:298311.
Zittel, Thomas, and Gschwend, Thomas. 2008. Individualised Constituency Campaigns in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: Candidates in the 2005 German Elections. West European Politics 31:9781003.

Keywords

Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Sudulich and Trumm Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown
PDF
Supplementary materials

Sudulich and Trumm supplementary material
Appendix

 PDF (283 KB)
283 KB

A Comparative Study of the Effects of Electoral Institutions on Campaigns

  • Laura Sudulich and Siim Trumm

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed