Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Who Caucuses? An Experimental Approach to Institutional Design and Electoral Participation

  • Christopher F. Karpowitz and Jeremy C. Pope
Abstract

During the 2008 presidential campaign, the question of mass participation in primaries and caucuses became unusually salient, with a close Democratic race calling special attention to these often overlooked procedural elements of America's democratic system. This study adds a new element to scholarship on institutional design and citizen participation by way of a survey-based experiment conducted in the midst of the 2008 campaign. The results show that institutional choices are not neutral. Nominating candidates through caucuses rather than primaries not only reduces the number of participants, but also significantly affects the ideological composition of the electorate. Caucuses produce a more ideologically consistent electorate than do primaries, because policy centrists appear to avoid caucuses. This experimental finding is strongly buttressed by the observational data on Obama and Clinton voters.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Who Caucuses? An Experimental Approach to Institutional Design and Electoral Participation
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Who Caucuses? An Experimental Approach to Institutional Design and Electoral Participation
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Who Caucuses? An Experimental Approach to Institutional Design and Electoral Participation
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Brigham Young University (email: Chris_karpowitz@byu.edu). The authors wish to thank the anonymous reviewers and participants in both the faculty research seminar at Brigham Young University and the 2009 CCES Conference for valuable comments and suggestions on earlier versions of the manuscript. Replication data are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123413000288.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Abramowitz, Alan I., Rapoport, Ronald B. Stone, Walter J.. 1991. Up Close and Personal: The 1988 Iowa Caucuses and Presidential Politics. Pp. 4271 in Nominating the President, edited by Emmett H. Buell, Jr., and Lee Sigelman. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Abramowitz, Alan I. Stone, Walter J.. 1984. Nomination Politics: Party Activists and Presidential Choice. New York: Praeger.
Ansolabehere, Stephen Persily, Nathaniel. 2008. Vote Fraud in the Eye of the Beholder: The Role of Public Opinion in the Challenge to Voter Identification Requirements. Harvard Law Review 121:17371774.
Ansolabehere, Stephen IIIStewart, Charles. 2009. Amazing Race: How Post-racial was Obama's Victory? Boston Review, January/February. Available from http://bostonreview.net/BR34.1/ansolabehere_stewart.php. Last accessed August 15, 2013.
Baldassari, Delia Gelman, Andrew. 2008. Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion. American Journal of Sociology 114:408446.
Cameron, Charles. 2000. Veto Bargaining: Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Converse, Philip E. 1964. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. Pp. 206261 in Ideology and Discontent, edited by David Apter. New York: The Free Press.
Cox, Gary McCubbins, Mathew. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crotty, William IIIJackson, John S.. 1985. Presidential Primaries and Nominations. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel J. Pope, Jeremy C.. 2006. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Longman.
Geer, John G. 1988. Assessing the Representativeness of Electorates in Presidential Primaries. American Journal of Political Science 32:929945.
Gerber, Alan S. Green, Donald P.. 2000. The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment. American Political Science Review 94:653663.
Gurian, Paul-Henri. 1993. Primaries versus Caucuses: Strategic Considerations of Presidential Candidates. Social Science Quarterly 74 (2):310321.
Gutmann, Amy Thompson, Dennis. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy?. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Hersh, Eitan. 2012. Primary Voters versus Caucus Goers and the Peripheral Motivations of Political Participation. Political Behavior 34 (4):689718.
Hibbing, John R. Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Highton, Benjamin. 1997. Easy Registration and Voter Turnout. Journal of Politics 59:565575.
Hill, Kim Quaile Leighley, Jan E.. 1993. Party Ideology, Organization, and Competitiveness as Mobilizing Forces in Gubernatorial Elections. American Journal of Political Science 37:11581178.
Hill, Seth, Ho, James, Vavreck, Lynn, Zaller, John. 2007. The Opt-in Internet Panel: Survey Mode, Sampling Methodology and the Implications for Political Research. Manuscript: UCLA.
Karpowitz, Christopher F., Raphael, Chad IVHammond, Allen S.. 2009. Deliberative Democracy and Inequality: Two Cheers for Enclave Deliberation among the Disempowered. Politics & Society 37:576615.
Kaufmann, Karen M., Gimpel, James G. Hoffman, Adam H.. 2003. A Promise Fulfilled? Open Primaries and Representation. Journal of Politics 65:457476.
Keeter, Scott Zukin, Cliff. 1983. Uninformed Choice: Failure of the New Presidential Nominating System. New York: Praeger.
Key, V.O. 1956. American State Politics: An Introduction. New York: Knopf.
Lengle, James I. 1981. Representation and Presidential Primaries: The Democratic Party in the Post-Reform Era. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
Levendusky, Matthew. 2010. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Ann Arbor: University of Chicago Press.
Lind, E. Allen Tyler, Tom R. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.
Macedo, Stephen, et al. 2005. Democracy at Risk: How Political Choices Undermine Citizen Participation, and What We Can Do About It. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1983. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Marshall, Thomas R. 1978. Turnout and Representation: Caucuses versus Primaries. American Journal of Political Science 22:169182.
Mayer, William G. 1996. Caucuses: How They Work: What Difference They Make. Pp. 108118 in In Pursuit of the White House, edited by William G. Mayer. Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House.
Mutz, Diana C. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Norrander, Barbara. 1989. Ideological Representativeness of Presidential Primary Voters. American Journal of Political Science 33:516536.
Norrander, Barbara. 1993. Nomination Choices: Caucus and Primary Outcomes, 1976–1988. American Journal of Political Science 37 (2):343364.
Norrander, Barabara. 1996. Field Essay: Presidential Nomination Politics in the Post-Reform Era. Political Research Quarterly 49:875915.
Panagopoulos, Costas. 2010. Are Caucuses Bad for Democracy? Political Science Quarterly 125 (3):425442.
Parent, T. Wayne., Jillson, Calvin C. Weber, Ronald E.. 1987. Voting Outcomes in the 1984 Democratic Party Primaries and Caucuses. American Political Science Review 81:6784.
Piven, Francis Cloward, Richard. 1988. Why Americans Don't Vote. New York: Pantheon.
Polsby, Nelson W. 1983. The Consequences of Party Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ranney, Austin. 1972. Turnout and Representation in Presidential Primary Elections. American Political Science Review 66:2137.
Rapoport, Ronald B., Stone, Walter J. Abramowitz, Alan I.. 1990. Sex and the Caucus Participant: The Gender Gap and Presidential Nominations. American Journal of Political Science 34:725740.
Redlawsk, David, Bowen, Daniel Tolbert, Caroline. 2008. Comparing Caucus and Registered Voter Support for the 2008 Presidential Candidates in Iowa. PS: Political Science & Politics 41:129138.
Rosenstone, Steven Hansen, John Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
Schattschneider, E.E. 1960. The Semisovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Serra, Gilles. 2011. Why Primaries? The Party's Tradeoff between Policy and Valence. Journal of Theoretical Politics 23 (1):2151.
Shafer, Byron E. Wichowsky, Amber. 2009. Institutional Structure and Democratic Values: A Research Note on a Natural Experiment. The Forum 7 (2) Article 2. Available from http://www.bepress.com/forum/vol7/iss2/art2/. Last accessed August 15, 2013.
Shepsle, Kenneth. 1994. Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions. Legislative Studies Quarterly 19:149179.
Southwell, Priscilla L. 2012. A Backroom without the Smoke? Superdelegates and the 2008 Democratic Nomination Process. Party Politics 18 (2):267283.
Stone, Walter J. 1982. Party, Ideology, and the Lure of Victory: Iowa Activists in the 1980 Prenomination Campaign. Western Political Quarterly 35:527538.
Stone, Walter J. Abramowitz, Alan I.. 1983. Winning May Not Be Everything, but It's More Than We Thought: Presidential Party Activists in 1980. American Political Science Review 77:945956.
Stone, Walter J., Abramowitz, Alan I. Rapoport, Ronald B.. 1989. How Representative Are the Iowa Caucuses? Pp. 1949 in The Iowa Caucuses and the Presidential Nominating Process, edited by Peverill Squire. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.
Stone, Walter J. Rapoport, Ronald B.. 1994. Candidate Perception among Nomination Activists: A New Look at the Moderation Hypothesis. Journal of Politics 56:10341052.
Thibaut, John Walker, Laurens. 1975. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Tyler, Tom R. 1988. What Is Procedural Justice? Criteria Used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures. Law and Society Review 28:701722.
Tyler, Tom R. 1989. The Psychology of Procedural Justice: A Test of the Group Value Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57:830838.
Tyler, Tom R. 2000. Social Justice: Outcome and Procedure. International Journal of Psychology 35:117125.
Tyler, Tom R., Rasinski, Kenneth Spodick, Nancy. 1985. The Influence of Voice on Satisfaction with Leaders: Exploring the Meaning of Process Control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48:7281.
Vavreck, Lynn, Rivers, Douglas. 2007, The 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study. Manuscript: Palo Alto, Calif. YouGov/Polimetrix.
Verba, Sidney Nie, Norman. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row.
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Brady., Henry 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Volunteerism in American Politics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Wolfinger, Raymond Rosenstone, Steven. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Karpowitz Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material

 Unknown (622 KB)
622 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Karpowitz Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material

 Word (25 KB)
25 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Karpowitz Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material

 Unknown (11 KB)
11 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 29
Total number of PDF views: 137 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 655 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 15th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.