Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Who Caucuses? An Experimental Approach to Institutional Design and Electoral Participation


During the 2008 presidential campaign, the question of mass participation in primaries and caucuses became unusually salient, with a close Democratic race calling special attention to these often overlooked procedural elements of America's democratic system. This study adds a new element to scholarship on institutional design and citizen participation by way of a survey-based experiment conducted in the midst of the 2008 campaign. The results show that institutional choices are not neutral. Nominating candidates through caucuses rather than primaries not only reduces the number of participants, but also significantly affects the ideological composition of the electorate. Caucuses produce a more ideologically consistent electorate than do primaries, because policy centrists appear to avoid caucuses. This experimental finding is strongly buttressed by the observational data on Obama and Clinton voters.

Hide All

Brigham Young University (email: The authors wish to thank the anonymous reviewers and participants in both the faculty research seminar at Brigham Young University and the 2009 CCES Conference for valuable comments and suggestions on earlier versions of the manuscript. Replication data are available at

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Delia Baldassari Andrew Gelman . 2008. Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion. American Journal of Sociology 114:408446.

Gary Cox Mathew McCubbins . 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

John G Geer . 1988. Assessing the Representativeness of Electorates in Presidential Primaries. American Journal of Political Science 32:929945.

Amy Gutmann Dennis Thompson . 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy?. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Eitan Hersh . 2012. Primary Voters versus Caucus Goers and the Peripheral Motivations of Political Participation. Political Behavior 34 (4):689718.

John R. Hibbing Elizabeth Theiss-Morse . 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Benjamin Highton . 1997. Easy Registration and Voter Turnout. Journal of Politics 59:565575.

Kim Quaile Hill Jan E. Leighley . 1993. Party Ideology, Organization, and Competitiveness as Mobilizing Forces in Gubernatorial Elections. American Journal of Political Science 37:11581178.

Christopher F. Karpowitz , Chad Raphael IV Allen S. Hammond . 2009. Deliberative Democracy and Inequality: Two Cheers for Enclave Deliberation among the Disempowered. Politics & Society 37:576615.

E. Allen Lind Tom R. Tyler 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.

Thomas R. Marshall 1978. Turnout and Representation: Caucuses versus Primaries. American Journal of Political Science 22:169182.

Diana C Mutz . 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Barabara Norrander . 1996. Field Essay: Presidential Nomination Politics in the Post-Reform Era. Political Research Quarterly 49:875915.

Costas Panagopoulos . 2010. Are Caucuses Bad for Democracy? Political Science Quarterly 125 (3):425442.

Gilles Serra . 2011. Why Primaries? The Party's Tradeoff between Policy and Valence. Journal of Theoretical Politics 23 (1):2151.

Kenneth Shepsle . 1994. Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions. Legislative Studies Quarterly 19:149179.

Priscilla L Southwell . 2012. A Backroom without the Smoke? Superdelegates and the 2008 Democratic Nomination Process. Party Politics 18 (2):267283.

Walter J. Stone Ronald B. Rapoport . 1994. Candidate Perception among Nomination Activists: A New Look at the Moderation Hypothesis. Journal of Politics 56:10341052.

Tom R Tyler . 2000. Social Justice: Outcome and Procedure. International Journal of Psychology 35:117125.

Tom R. Tyler , Kenneth Rasinski Nancy Spodick . 1985. The Influence of Voice on Satisfaction with Leaders: Exploring the Meaning of Process Control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48:7281.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

British Journal of Political Science
  • ISSN: 0007-1234
  • EISSN: 1469-2112
  • URL: /core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Karpowitz Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material

 Unknown (622 KB)
622 KB
Supplementary Materials

Karpowitz Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material

 Word (25 KB)
25 KB
Supplementary Materials

Karpowitz Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material

 Unknown (11 KB)
11 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 70 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 373 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.