Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T06:05:26.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biosensors for livestock production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

K. C. Persaud*
Affiliation:
Department of Instrumentation and Analytical Science, UMIST, Manchester, M60 1QD, UK
Get access

Abstract

The rapid development and application of biosensors is likely to have considerable impact on livestock management. Biosensors are considered to be analytical devices incorporating a biological material, or a biologically derived material intimately associated with or integrated within a physicochemical transducer or transducing microsystem. For livestock production it is useful to consider where sensors may be used effectively. These may include monitoring of the living environment to ensure that adequate hygiene and animal welfare are maintained, waste management, monitoring of the metabolic state of the livestock so that adequate intake of nutrients is maintained, detection of oestrus or other conditions, monitoring for bacterial or viral infections, both in live animals, and during the processing of animal products. For animal welfare, biosensors are needed to measure biological effects e.g. genotoxicity, immunotoxicity, biotoxins and endocrine effects. The concentrations of specific analytes that are difficult to detect are important contaminants of water, waste, soil or air (e.g. surfactants, chlorinated hydrocarbons, sulphophenyl carboxylates, sulphonated dyes, fluorescent whitening agents, napthalensulphonates, carboxylic acids, dioxins, pesticide metabolites etc). The development of practical biosensing systems capable of operation under realistic conditions is discussed.

Type
Offered Papers
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atanasov, P., Espinosa, M. and Wilkins, E. (2000) Organophosphate biosensors based on mediatorless bioelectrocatalysis. ACS Symp. Ser., 762, 125138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, I.E., Malirat, V., Dias, L.E. and Dilandro, R. (1996) Identification of foot-and-mouth disease virus-free regions by use of a standardized enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot assay. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 57, 972974.Google Scholar
Cho, J.C., Cho, H.B. and Kim, S.J. (2000) Heavy contamination of a subsurface aquifer and a stream by livestock wastewater in a stock farming area, Wonju, Korea. Environ. Pollut. (Oxford, U. K. ), 109, 137146.Google Scholar
Corbett, W.T., Guy, J., Lieuw, A.J., Hunter, L., Grindem, C., Levy, M., Cullen, J. and Vaz, V. (1989) Epidemiologic survey of bovine diseases in Suriname. Bulletin of the PAN American Health Organization, 23, 424430.Google Scholar
Crooks, S.R.H., Stenberg, E., Johansson, M.A., Hellenaes, K.E. and Elliott, C.T. (2001) Optical biosensor for high-throughput detection of veterinary drug residues in foods. Proc. SPIE-Int. Soc. Opt. Eng., 4206, 123130.Google Scholar
Ivnitski, D., Abdel-Hamid, I., Atanasov, P. and Wilkins, E. (1999) Biosensors for detection of pathogenic bacteria. Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 14, 599624.Google Scholar
Karube, I., Yano, K., Sasaki, S., Nomura, Y. and Ikebukuro, K. (1998) Biosensors for environmental monitoring. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 864, 2336.Google Scholar
Kiefer, H., Klee, B., John, E., Stierhof, Y.D. and Jahnig, F. (1991) Biosensors based on membrane-transport proteins. Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 6, 233237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lammers, F. and Scheper, T. (1999) Thermal biosensors in biotechnology. Adv. Biochem. Eng. / Biotechnol., 64, 3567.Google Scholar
McArdle, F.A. and Persaud, K.C. (1993) Development of an enzyme-based biosensor for atrazine detection. Analyst (Cambridge, U. K. ), 118, 419423.Google Scholar
Odend'hal, S. (1986) Bovine leukosis: an example of poor disease monitoring of international livestock shipments to developing countries. Social Science And Medicine, 23, 10171020.Google Scholar
Thevenot, D.R., Toth, K., Durst, R.A. and Wilson, G.S. (2001) Electrochemical biosensors: recommended definitions and classification. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 16, 121131.Google Scholar
Turner, A.P.F. (2000) Techview: Biochemistry: Biosensors-sense and sensitivity. Science (Washington, D. C. ), 290, 1315 1317.Google Scholar
Wang, J. (2000) From DNA biosensors to gene chips. Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 30113016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wavering, T.A., Meller, S.A., Evans, M.K., Pennington, C., Jones, M.E., VanTassell, R., Murphy, K.A., Velander, W.H. and Valdes, E. (2000) Interferometric optical fiber microcantilever beam biosensor. Proc. SPIE-Int. Soc. Opt. Eng., 4200, 1016.Google Scholar
Wuyts, N., Chokesajjawatee, N. and Panyim, S. (1994) A simplified and highly sensitive detection of Trypanosoma evansi by DNA amplification. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health, 25, 266271.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhou, X.C., Hwang, L.Q. and Li, S.F.Y. (2001) Microgravimetric DNA sensor based on quartz crystal microbalance: comparison of oligonucleotide immobilization methods and the application in genetic diagnosis. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 16, 8595.Google Scholar