Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T03:04:04.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

First Service Calving Rates In Irish Dairy Herds: Trends From 1991-1996

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

KJ O'Farrell
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Dairy Production Dept, Moorepark Research Centre, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
J Crilly
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Dairy Production Dept, Moorepark Research Centre, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
Get access

Abstract

In Ireland, surveys in the 1970's have shown calving rates to first service of 60-69%. Since then genetic merit and milk yield per cow have increased significantly. The objectives of this study were to determine calving rates in Irish dairy herds for the period 1991-1996 and if these had declined over time. Breeding records for 58 Spring calving commercial dairy herds maintained on the computerised DAIRYMIS System were analysed. Inseminations were categorised as either DIY AI (DIY), commercial AI (COM) or Natural Service (NAT). Between 1991 and 1996 there was a significant trend towards DIY (P<0.01) and away from NAT (P<0.01) with no consistent trend in COM usage. In 1991, roughly one third of services were to each of the three service methods but by 1996 DIY accounted for nearly 50% of all services. A subset of 34 herds, which had been present for at least five of the six years between 1991 and 1996, was used in the calving rate analysis. Calving rates to first service for DIY (48.4%) and NAT (46.0%) were not significantly different although both were significantly lower (P<0.001) than those for COM (54.5%). For small (<65), medium (65-128) and large herds (˃128) the respective proportion of services in each category were 22%, 44% and 34%. The respective calving rates of 55.2%, 51.6% and 45.7% declined significantly as herd size increased For all service types, there was a significant (P<0.001) decline in first service calving rate over time. The increased usage of DIY, combined with its lower fertility rates, would appear to be one factor responsible for the reduction in calving rate for 1991-1996 period.

Type
Posters
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon, (1997), Department of Agriculture, Cattle artificial insemination results, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
Boyd, H. and Reed, H. C. B. (1961). Investigations into the incidence and causes of infertility in dairy cattle - Influence of some management factors affecting the semen and insemination conditions. British Veterinary Journal, 117, 74.Google Scholar
Crosse, S (1991) Development and implementation of a computer management information system (DairyMis II) for Irish Dairy Farmers Computers and electronics in Agriculture 6:157173 Google Scholar
Crowley, JP, Harrington, D and Lacy, M (1967) A Survey of Reproductive Efficiency in Cattle. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 6: 237246 Google Scholar
Cunningham, EP, O'Byrne, TM (1980) Survey of A.I. Results 1979 : Final Report Trinity College Dublin. Applied Research and Consultancy Group, Dublin 2. Google Scholar
Cunningham, EP, O'Byrne, TM and Murphy, N (1978) Survey on A.I. Results 1978 : Final Report Trinity College Dublin. Applied Research and Consultancy Group, Dublin 2. Google Scholar
deKruif, A. (1975). An investigation of the parameters which determine the fertility of a cattle population and some factors which influence these parameters. Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde, 100,1089.Google Scholar
Erb, H. N., Martin, S.W., Ison, N. and Swaminathan, S. (1981) Inter-relationships between Production and Reproduction Diseases in Holstein Cows, Conditional Relationships between Production and Disease. Journal of Dairy Science, 64, 272.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, J., Van der Lugt, A. W., Van der Werf, J.H.J., and Ouwelties, W. (1994). Genetic and Phenotypic parameters for milk production and fertility traits in upgraded dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science, 40, 225232.Google Scholar
Howells, H.M.J., Davies, D.A.R. and Dobson, H. (1999). Influence of the number of days spent training in an abattoir with access to live cows on the efficiency of do-it-yourself artificial insemination. Vet. Rec. 144, 310314 Google Scholar
Laborde, D., Holmes, C.W., Garcia-Muniz, J.G. and Wichtel, J. (1998). Reproductive performance of Holstein-Friesian cows differing genetically in liveweight Proceedings of New Zealand Society of Animal Production, 58: 7375.Google Scholar
Macmillan, K, Lean, IJ and Westwood, CT (1996) The effects of lactation on the fertility of dairy cows. Australian Veterinary Journal 73 :141147 Google Scholar
Roche, JF, Sherington, J, Mitchell, JP and Cunningham, JF (1978) Factors Affecting Calving Rate to AI in Cows. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 17: 149157 Google Scholar
Royal, M. D.,Darwash, A. O. and Lamming G. E., . 1998. Trends in the fertility of dairy cows in the United Kingdom. In: International Symposium on Metabolic Stress in Dairy Cows.(British Society of Animal Science - EU Concerted Action - BCVA). 28-3, Edinburgh, Scotland, 28-Oct-1998, P 15.Google Scholar
Shaw, C and Dobson, H (1996) Reproductive and financial impact of a do-it-yourself artificial insemination programme compared with keeping a bull. Veterinary Record, 139: 594597 Google Scholar
Watson, E.D., Jones, P.C. and Saunders, R.W. (1987). Effect of factors associated with insemination on calving rate in dairy cows. Veterinary Record, 121; 256258.Google Scholar
White, DS, and O'Farrell, JD (1972) The Artificial Insemination Service and Conception Rates. The Veterinary Services Bulletin 1: 6960 Google Scholar