Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T08:04:23.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Implications of genotype X nutrition interactions for efficiency of milk production systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

C. S. Mayne  and
F. J. Gordon
C. S. Mayne
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR
F. J. Gordon
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR
Get access

Abstract

Major increases in the rate of genetic improvement in the dairy herd have been obtained in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland since the mid 1980s. The implications of increases in genetic merit and the possible consequences of genotype X nutrition interactions on the efficiency of milk production systems are reviewed. The majority of previous studies with dairy cattle of moderate genetic merit suggest little evidence of genotype X nutrition interactions across a range of nutritional and management regimes, with higher milk production of high merit cows largely accounted for by effects on nutrient partitioning. However, more recent results suggest a significant re-ranking of sires when evaluated under either intensive feeding systems or in systems with a high reliance on grazed pasture.

Under intensive feeding systems higher animal performance has been obtained with high merit cows across a range of concentrate inputs and feeding systems. However, recent results from the Langhill studies provide the first tentative evidence of a genotype X nutrition interaction, with significantly different regression coefficients between genetic merit (as assessed by pedigree index) and milk production, under either low or high forage diets. The implications of these results are that high merit cows may be unable to express their full genetic potential for milk production when offered a high forage (or low energy density) diet. Consequently, the influence of other factors which have a major effect on voluntary food intake, and hence nutrient intake, e.g. forage dry matter content and forage digestibility, may be relatively more important with high genetic merit dairy cows.

It is concluded that higher milk production in high merit cows is largely attributable to variation in partitioning of nutrients, rather than to changes in food intake or digestive efficiency. Consequently, it is important fully to assess the animal performance and welfare implications of maintaining high genetic merit dairy cows under systems which may limit nutrient intake, e.g. under high forage regimes involving a high reliance on grazed or conserved forage. The major challenge for research and dairy herd management is to increase food intake with grass- and/or grass silage-based diets, thereby reducing the need for high levels of concentrates input to prevent excessive body condition loss with high genetic merit dairy cows in early lactation.

Type
Research Article
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 19: Breeding and Feeding the High Genetic Merit Dairy Cow , 1995 , pp. 67 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. An advisory manual prepared by the AFRC Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Bryant, A. M. 1983. Effects of breeding index on dairy farm productivity. Research Division of the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries of New Zealand annual report, p. 52.Google Scholar
Bryant, A. M. 1984. Effects of breeding index on dairy farm productivity. Research Division of the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries of New Zealand annual report, p. 50.Google Scholar
Bryant, A. M. 1985. Effects of breeding index on dairy farm productivity. Research Division of the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries of New Zealand annual report, p. 41.Google Scholar
Bryant, A. M. 1986. Effect of genotype on the performance of Jersey cows and per hectare production of milk solids. Proceedings British Cattle Breeders Club winter conference, pp. 55–62.Google Scholar
Burnside, E. B., Graham, N., Rapitta, A. E., McBride, B. W. and Gibson, J. P. 1991. The Canadian approach to breeding efficient dairy cows. Proceedings British Cattle Breeders Chib winter conference, pp. 25–28.Google Scholar
Coffey, M. 1992. Genetic trends — has progress been made in the last six years? Holstein Friesian Journal 74: 62–63.Google Scholar
Forbes, M. 1995. Voluntary food intake — a limiting constraint. In Breeding and feeding the high genetic merit dairy cow, British Society of Animal Science, occasional publication no. 19, pp. 13–19.Google Scholar
Freeman, A. E. 1975. Genetic variation in nutrition of dairy cattle. In The effect of genetic variance on nutritional requirements of animals, pp. 19–46. National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Funk, D. A. 1993. Optimal genetic improvement for the high producing herd. Journal of Dairy Science 76: 3278–3286.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1984. The effect of level of concentrate supplementation given with grass silage during the winter on the total lactation performance of autumn calving dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102:163–179.Google Scholar
Grainger, C., Holmes, C. W. and Moore, Y. F. 1985. Performance of Friesian cows with high and low breeding indexes. 2. Energy and nitrogen balance experiments with lactating and pregnant, non lactating cows. Animal Production 40: 389–400.Google Scholar
Holden, L. A., Muller, L. D. and Fales, S. L. 1994. Estimation of intake in high producing Holstein cows grazing grass pasture. Journal of Dairy Science 77: 2332–2340.Google Scholar
Holmes, C. W. 1988. Genetic merit and efficiency of milk production by the dairy cow. In Nutrition and lactation in the dairy cow. (ed. Garnsworthy, P. C.), pp. 195–215. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasiorowski, H. 1983. Polish experiments with Friesians. International Dairy Federation Bulletin, document 165, pp. 7–19.Google Scholar
Lamb, R. C., Walters, J. L., Anderson, M. J., Plowman, R. D., Mickelsen, C. H. and Miller, R. H. 1977. Effects of sire and interaction of sire with ration on efficiency of feed utilization by Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 60: 1755–1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayne, C. S. and Goodall, E. A. 1996. The effect of protein content of the supplement and level of supplementation on the performance of dairy cattle offered grass silage ad libitum. 2. Effects on animal performance during the winter feeding period. Animal Science In press.Google Scholar
Meijs, J. A. C. and Hoekstra, J. A. 1984. Concentrate supplementation of grazing dairy cows. 1. Effect of concentrate intake and herbage allowance on herbage intake. Grass and Forage Science 39: 59–66.Google Scholar
Moorby, J. M. 1994. Short and long term effects of diet on the concentration of protein in the milk of dairy cows. Ph.D. thesis, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Oldham, J. D., Simm, G. and Marsden, S. 1992. Nutrition — genotype interactions in dairy cattle. In Recent advances in animal nutrition — 1992, (ed. Garnsworthy, P. C., Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 73–92. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Ostergaard, V. 1979. Strategies for concentrate feeding to attain optimum feeding level in high yield cows. 482 Beretning fra Statens Husdyrbrugs forsog Kobenhavn 1979, pp. 138.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. C., Gordon, F. J. and Mayne, C. S. 1994. The influence of genetic merit for milk production on the response to complete diet feeding. Animal Production 53: 437.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. C., Gordon, F. J., Mayne, C. S., Porter, M. G. and Unsworth, E. F. 1995. The effects of genetic merit on nutrient utilization in lactating dairy cows. In Breeding and feeding the high genetic merit dairy cow, British Society of Animal Science, occasional publication no. 19, pp. 97–98.Google Scholar
Peterson, R. 1988. Comparison of Canadian and New Zealand sires in New Zealand for production, weight and conformation traits. (Unpublished report).Google Scholar
Phillips, C. J. C. and Leaver, J. D. 1985. Offering supplementary forage to grazing dairy cows. 2. Offering grass silage in early and late season. Grass and Forage Science 40:193–199.Google Scholar
Richardson, D. O., Owen, J. R., Plowman, R. D. and Miles, J. T. 1971. Importance of sire X ration interactions in production and feed intake traits of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 54:1518–1525.Google Scholar
Sejrsen, K. and Neimann-Sorensen, ??. 1994. Sources of genetic variation in efficiency of cattle : biological basis. Proceedings of the forty-fifth meeting of European Association of Animal Production, Edinburgh, p. 140.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J., Gordon, F. J., Mayne, C. S., Poots, R. E., Unsworth, E. F., Kilpatrick, D. J., Porter, M. G. and Pippard, C. J. 1994. Prediction of silage intake by cattle. Proceedings of the fourth British Grassland Society research conference, Reading, pp. 47–48.Google Scholar
Stobbs, T. H. 1973. The effect of plant structure on the intake of tropical pastures. 1. Variation in the bite size of grazing cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24: 809–819.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. 1980. Conserved forages. In Feeding strategies for dairy cows, (ed. Broster, W. H., Johnson, C. L. and Taylor, J. C.), pp. 8.1–8.14. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Trigg, T. E. and Parr, C. R. 1981. Aspects of energy metabolism of Jersey cows differing in breeding index. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 41: 44–47.Google Scholar
Veerkamp, R. F., Simm, G. and Oldham, J. D. 1994. Effects of interaction between genotype and feeding system on milk production, feed intake, efficiency and body tissue mobilization in dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 39: 229–241.Google Scholar
Wang, S., Roy, G. L., Lee, A. J., McAllister, A. J., Batra, T. R., Lin, C. Y., Vesely, J. A., Wauthy, J. M. and Winter, K. A. 1992. Genetic line x concentrate feed level interactions for milk production and feed efficiency in dairy cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 72: 227–236.Google Scholar