Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T07:11:13.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inhibition of equine cyathostomes to glucosinolate hydrolysis products

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

L Brett
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Sciences, Imperial College London(Wye Campus), Wye, Ashford, Kent, TN25 5AH, UK, Email, r.geering@imperial.ac.uk
J Rossiter
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Sciences, Imperial College London(Wye Campus), Wye, Ashford, Kent, TN25 5AH, UK, Email, r.geering@imperial.ac.uk
L Clarke
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Sciences, Imperial College London(Wye Campus), Wye, Ashford, Kent, TN25 5AH, UK, Email, r.geering@imperial.ac.uk
R Geering
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Sciences, Imperial College London(Wye Campus), Wye, Ashford, Kent, TN25 5AH, UK, Email, r.geering@imperial.ac.uk
Get access

Extract

Cyathostome nematodes have become the central focus of concerns related to internal parasites of horses due to their pathological and persistent effects on the growing and mature horse (Murphy and Love, 1997). Current anthelmintic treatments have, however, led to resistance and alternative control measures are required. Glucosinolate hydrolysis derivatives have a wide range of biological activities, and have previously been shown to inhibit root nematodes (Brown and Morra, 1997). The aim of the study was to examine whether cyathostome nematode eggs could be inhibited by glucosinolate hydrolysis products.

An in vitro egg hatch assay was set up using eggs extracted from the faeces of naturally infected horses (Kassai, 1999). The egg suspension (containing approximately 100 eggs) were incubated with nine different concentrations (range: 20-10,000 ppm) of the glucosinolate hydrolysis products (allyl isothiocyanate (C), allyl nitrile (N) and phenethyl isothiocyanate (P). A control was set up in which water replaced the hydrolysis product. The number of eggs and larvae were counted using an inverted microscope. Statistical differences between treatments were assessed using General Linear Model, ANOVA.

Type
Posters
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, P.D. and Morra, M.J. (1997). Control of soil borne pests using glucosinolate containing plants. Advances in Agronomy 61: 167231.Google Scholar
Kassai, T. (1999). Nematoa, horses and diagnostic helminthology. Veterinary Helminthology, 169: 183203.Google Scholar
Murphy, D. and Love, S. (1997). The pathogenic effects of experimental cyathostome infections in ponies. Veterinary Parasitology, 106(4): 99110.Google Scholar