Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T11:20:45.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The relationship between facial whorl direction and sidedness in ridden horses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

H. Randle
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drakes Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, U.K.hrandle@plymouth.ac.uk
E. Elworthy
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drakes Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, U.K.hrandle@plymouth.ac.uk
Get access

Extract

The influence of Natural Selection on the evolution of the horse (Equus callabus) is minimal due to its close association with humans. Instead Artificial Selection is commonly imposed through selection for features such as a ‘breed standard’ or competitive ability. It has long been considered to be useful if indicators of characteristics such as physical ability could be identified. Kidd (1902) suggested that the hair coverings of animals were closely related to their lifestyle, whether they were active or passive. In 1973 Smith and Gong concluded that hair whorl (trichloglyph) pattern and human behaviour is linked since hair patterning is determined at the same time as the brain develops in the foetus. More recently Grandin et al. (1995), Randle (1998) and Lanier et al. (2001) linked features of facial hair whorls to behaviour and production in cattle. Hair whorl features have also been related to temperament in equines (Randle et al., 2003).

Type
Posters
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Friedman, J. H., Golomb, J. and Mora, M. N. 1952. The hair whorl sign of handedness. Diseases of the Nervous System 13:308–216.Google Scholar
Grandin, T., Deesing, M. J., Struthers, J. J. and Swinker, A. M. 1995. Cattle with hair whorl patterns above the eyes are more behaviourally agitated during restraint. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 46:117123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klar, A. J. S. 2003. Human handedness and scalp hair-whorl direction develop from a common genetic mechanism. Genetics 165:269276.Google Scholar
Lanier, J. L., Grandin, T., Green, R., Avery, D. and McGee, K. 2001. A note on hair whorl position and cattle temperament in the auction ring. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 73:93101.Google Scholar
Marion, R. W. 1985. Correlation between parietal hair whorl and brain dominance. Pediatric Research 19:A328.Google Scholar
Martin, F. and Niemitz, C. “Right-trunkers” and “left-trunkers”: Side preferences of trunk movements in wild Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). Journal of Comparative Psychology 117:371379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGreevy, P. and Rogers, L. J. 2005. Motor and sensory laterality in thoroughbred horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 21:337352.Google Scholar
Murphy, J., Sutherland, A. and Arkins, S. 2005. Idiosyncratic motor laterality in the horse. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 91:397–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randle, H. D. 1998. Facial hair whorl position and temperament in cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 56:139147.Google Scholar
Randle, H. D., Webb, T. J. and Gill, L. 2003. The relationship between facial hair whorls and temperament in Lundy ponies. Annual Report of the Lundy Field Society 52:6783.Google Scholar
Smith, D. W. and Gong, B. T. 1973. Scalp hair patterning as a clue to early foetal brain development. The Journal of Pediatrics 83:374380.Google Scholar
Swinker, A. M., Deesing, M. J., Tanner, M. and Grandin, T. 1994. Observation of normal and abnormal hair whorl patterning on the equine forehead. Journal of Animal Science 72:207.Google Scholar
Tanner, M., Grandin, G., Cattell, M. and Deesing, M. J. 1994. The relationship between facial hair whorls and milking parlour side preferences. Journal of Animal Science 72:207.Google Scholar