Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-21T22:17:23.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships between body weight, body measurements and milk yield in Holstein heifers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

E. P. C. Koenen  and
C. van der Linde
E. P. C. Koenen
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, Wageningen Agricultural University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
C. van der Linde
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, Wageningen Agricultural University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

Five size traits (body weight, heart girth, hip height, body depth and rump width) and three yield traits (milk, fat and protein) of 7192 heifers were analysed on a monthly and 305-day lactation basis. The additive genetic variation was moderate to high and changed over time. Correlations between observations measured in different months were all >0.89. Covariance methodology was used to reduce the number of parameters to estimate the variance components. Correlations between size and yield traits ranged from -0.14 to 0.26; this study did not indicate that these correlations were time-dependent.

Type
Research Article
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 24: Metabolic stress in dairy cows , 1999 , pp. 165 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Ahlborn, G. and Dempfle, L. 1992. Genetic parameters for milk production and body size in New Zealand Holstein-Friesian and Jersey. Livestock Production Science 31:205–219.Google Scholar
Brotherstone, S. 1994. Genetic and phenotypic correlations between linear type traits and production traits in Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle. Animal Production 59:183–188.Google Scholar
Dempfle, L. 1986. Increasing the efficiency of the dairy cow with regard to body size. Research bulletin number 4. Livestock Improvement Corporation, New Zealand Dairy Board, Hamilton, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Elzakker, P. J. M. van and Arendonk, J. A. M. van. 1993. Feed intake, body weight and milk production: genetic analysis of different measurements in lactating dairy heifers. Livestock Production Science 37:37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hietanen, H. and Ojala, M. 1995. Factors affecting body weight and its association with milk production traits in Finnish Ayrshire and Friesian cows. Acta Agricultura Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science 45:92–98.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, M., Hill, W. G. and Thompson, R. 1994. Estimating the covariance structure of traits during growth and ageing, illustrated with lactation in dairy cattle. Genetical Research, Cambridge 64:57–69.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, M., Lofsvold, M. and Bulmer, M. 1990. Analysis of the inheritance, selection and evolution of growth trajectories. Genetics 124: 979–993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koenen, E. P.C. and Groen, A. F. 1998. Genetic evaluation of body weight of lactating Holstein heifers using body measurements and conformation traits. Journal of Dairy Science 81:1709–1713.Google Scholar
Koenen, E. P.C. and Veerkamp, R.F. 1997. Genotype by diet interactions for live weight and body condition score during lactation in heifers. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 1998, p. 38 (abstr.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenen, E. P.C. and Veerkamp, R. F. 1998. Generic covariance functions for live weight, condition score and dry-matter intake measures at different lactation stages of Holstein Friesian heifers. Livestock Production Science 75: 67–77.Google Scholar
Lee, A. J., Boichard, D. A., McAllister, A. J., Lin, Y.C., Nadarajah, T. R., Roy, G. L. and Vesely, J. A. 1992. Genetics of growth, feed intake and milk yield in Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 75:3145–3154.Google Scholar
Maltz, E., Kroll, O., Spahr, S. L., Devir, S., Genizi, A. and Sagi, R. 1991. Milk yield, parity and cow potential as variables for computerized concentrate supplementation strategy. Journal of Dairy Science 74:2277–2289.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. 1991. Dfreml — a set of programs to estimate variance components by restricted maximum likelihood using a derivative free algorithm . User notes version 2.0 University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. 1998. Estimating covariance functions for longitudinal data using a random regression model. Proceedings of the sixth world congress genetics applied to livestock production, Armidale, vol. 25, pp. 517–520.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. and Hill, W. G. 1997. Estimation of genetic and phenotypic (co)variance functions for longitudinal or “repeated” records by restricted maximum likelihood. Livestock Production Science 47:185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mistztal, I., Lawlor, T. J., Short, T. H. and VanRaden, P. M. 1992. Multiple-trait estimation of variance components of yield and type traits using an animal model. Journal of Dairy Science 75:544–551.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, L. R. and Dekkers, J. C. M. 1994. Random regressions in animal models for test-day production in dairy cattle. Proceedings of the fifth world congress genetics applied to livestock production, Guelvh, vol. 18, pp. 443 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. and Schönmuth, G. 1995. Einflußfaktoren auf Futteraufnahme — eine experimentelle Studie an Holstein-Friesian, Jersey und Schwarzbuntem Milchrind. Archiv für Tierzucht 38:513–526.Google Scholar
Veerkamp, R. F. and Brotherstone, S. 1997. Genetic correlations between linear type traits, food intake, live weight and condition score in Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle. Animal Science 64:385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werf, J. H. J. van der, Goddard, M. E. and Meyer, K. 1998. The use of covariance functions and random regressions for genetic evaluation of milk production based on test day records. Journal of Dairy Science 81:3300–3308.Google Scholar