Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T22:09:58.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Upregulated mesoaccumbens dopamine transmission alters extinction learning profile of an operant response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

A.J. Hemmings
Affiliation:
Royal Agricultural College Cirencester Gloucestershire GL7 6JSandrew.hemmings@rac.ac.uk
S.D. McBride
Affiliation:
Institute of Rural Sciences, University of Wales, Aberystwyth SY23 3ALsdm@aber.ac.uk
C.E Hale
Affiliation:
Writtle College, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 3RRcatherine_hale17@hotmail.com
Get access

Extract

Crib-biting horses were recently shown to exhibit increased activity within the mesoaccumbens dopamine pathway (McBride and Hemmings 2005). Given the multi-factored functionality of the mesoaccumbens system, this alteration in dopamine physiology may have an effect on other aspects of the behavioural repertoire. For instance, in experiments which sought to ascertain the function of the nucleus accumbens in extinction learning, nucleus accumbens dopamine efflux decreased in a linear fashion following unrewarded operant responses, whilst exitotoxic (ibotenic acid) lesions of the nucleus accumbens had the ability to impair response extinction (Ichikawa et al. (2004). Thus, a role for this brain region in extinction learning is certainly implicated. The aim of this study was to determine if facilitated accumbens dopamine transmission affects learning characteristics in the horse. From the aforementioned discussion it was hypothesised that enhanced accumbens dopamine transmission would potentially delay the linear reduction in dopamine release associated with extinction of an operant response. Or, from a functional perspective, cause heightened salience of a conditioned stimulus thereby delaying the onset of extinction learning.

Type
Posters
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aberman, J.E. and Salamone, J.D., 1999 Nucleus accumbens dopamine depletions make rats more sensitive to high ratio requirements but do not impair primary food reinforcement. Neuroscience, 92:2,545552 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balleine, B. and Killcross, S., 1994 Effects of ibotenic acid lesions of the nucleus accumbens on instrumental action. Behavioural Brain Research 65:181-93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, J.J. and Nicol, C.J., 1991 Stereotypic behaviour effects environmental preference in Bank Voles; Clethrionomis-Glareolus. Animal Behavior 41; 971977 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichikawa, Y. Izawa, E.I., Matsushima, T., 2004. Excitotoxic lesions of the medial striatum delay extinction of a reinforcement color discrimination operant task in domestic chicks; a functional role of reward anticipation. Cognitive Brain Research. 22:7683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garner, J.P. and Mason, G.J., 2002 Evidence for a relationship between cage stereotypies and behavioural disinhibition in laboratory rodents.Behavioural Brain Research. 136,:1, 8392 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemmings, A.J. McBride, S.D. and Smith, N., 2004 The putative reward function of equine stereotypy. Emerging Equine Science, Nottingham University Press 6778 Google Scholar
McBride, S.D. and Hemmings, A.. 2005 Altered mesoaccumbens and nigro-striatal dopamine physiology is associated with stereotypy development in a non-rodent species. Behavioural Brain Research;159:113118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickery, S.S. and Mason, G.J 2005 Stereotypy and perseverative responding in caged bears: further data and analyses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 9: 3-4,247260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyvell, C.L. and Berridge, KC (2000). Intra-accumbens amphetamine increases the conditioned incentive salience of sucrose reward: enhancement of reward wanting without enhanced liking or response reinforcement. J Neurosci 208:122–30Google Scholar