Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-7f7b94f6bd-8mfwn Total loading time: 0.301 Render date: 2022-06-30T02:36:53.088Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Movement analyses of wood cricket (Nemobius sylvestris) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2009

N.C. Brouwers*
School of Conservation Sciences, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Fern Barrow, Poole, Dorset, BH12 5BB, UK
A.C. Newton
School of Conservation Sciences, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Fern Barrow, Poole, Dorset, BH12 5BB, UK
*Author for correspondence Fax: +44 1202 965255 E-mail:


Information on the dispersal ability of invertebrate species associated with woodland habitats is severely lacking. Therefore, a study was conducted examining the movement patterns of wood cricket (Nemobius sylvestris) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) on the Isle of Wight, UK. Juvenile (i.e. nymphs) and adult wood crickets were released and observed over time within different ground surface substrates. Their movement paths were recorded and subsequently analysed using random walk models. Nymphs were found to move more slowly than adults did; and, when given a choice, both nymphs and adults showed a preference for moving through or over leaf litter compared to bare soil or grass. A correlated random walk (CRW) model accurately described the movement pattern of adult wood crickets through leaf litter, indicating a level of directional persistence in their movements. The estimated population spread through leaf litter for adults was 17.9 cm min−1. Movements of nymphs through leaf litter could not accurately be described by a random walk model, showing a change in their movement pattern over time from directed to more random movements. The estimated population spread through leaf litter for nymphs was 10.1 cm min−1. The results indicate that wood cricket adults can be considered as more powerful dispersers than nymphs; however, further analysis of how the insects move through natural heterogeneous environments at a range of spatio-temporal scales needs to be performed to provide a complete understanding of the dispersal ability of the species.

Research Paper
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Baars, M.A. (1979) Patterns of movement of radioactive carabid beetles. Oecologia 44, 125140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, S. (2007) Increasing connectivity in fragmented landscapes: an investigation of evidence for biodiversity gain in woodlands. Forest Ecology and Management 238, 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhamou, S. (1990) An analysis of movements of the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus in its home range. Behavioural Processes 22, 235250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, A.F. (2003). Linkages in the Landscape: The Role of Corridors and Connectivity in Wildlife Conservation. 254 pp. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, IUCN.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beugnon, G. (1979) Etude de l'orientation visuelle du grillon des bois Nemobius sylvestris dans son milieu naturel, PhD thesis, Universite Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
Beugnon, G. (1980) Daily migrations of the wood cricket Nemobius sylvestris. Environmental Entomology 9, 801805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowlby, H.D., Hanson, J.M. & Hutchings, J.A. (2007) Resident and dispersal behavior among individuals within a population of American lobster Homarus americanus. Marine Ecology Progress Series 331, 207218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwers, N. & Newton, A. (2009a) The influence of habitat availability and landscape structure on the distribution of wood cricket (Nemobius sylvestris) on the Isle of Wight, UK. Landscape Ecology 24, 199212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwers, N.C. & Newton, A.C. (2009b) Habitat requirements for the conservation of wood cricket (Nemobius sylvestris) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) on the Isle of Wight, UK. Journal of Insect Conservation 13, 529541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwers, N.C. & Newton, A.C. (2009c) Movement rates of woodland invertebrates: a systematic review of empirical evidence. Insect Conservation and Diversity 2, 1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwers, N.C., Watts, K., Bailey, S. & Newton, A.C. (2009) Measuring woodland connectivity for wood cricket (Nemobius sylvestris) on the Isle of Wight, UK. pp. 2532in Catchpole, R., Smithers, R., Baarda, P. & Eycott, A. (Eds) Ecological Networks: Science and Practice. IALE (UK) Conference Proceedings, Edinburgh University, 1–3 September 2009, Lancashire, UK, Colin Cross Printers Ltd.Google Scholar
Brown, V.K. (1978) Variations in voltinism and diapause intensity in Nemobius sylvestris Orthoptera Gryllidae. Journal of Natural History 12, 461472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, J.A. (2001) Correlated random walk equations of animal dispersal resolved by simulation. Ecology 82, 16801690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, M.L. (1990) Models of clonal growth in Solidago altissima. Journal of Ecology 78, 2746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campan, R. & Gautier, J.Y. (1975) Orientation of the cricket Nemobius sylvestris (Bosc) towards forest-trees. Daily variations and ontogenetic development. Animal Behaviour 23, 640649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conradt, L. & Roper, T.J. (2006) Nonrandom movement behavior at habitat boundaries in two butterfly species: implications for dispersal. Ecology 87, 125132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crist, T.O., Guertin, D.S., Wiens, J.A. & Milne, B.T. (1992) Animal movement in heterogeneous landscapes: an experiment with eleodes beetles in shortgrass prairie. Functional Ecology 6, 536544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, J.T. (2003) Movement and spatial population structure of a prairie planthopper. Ecology 84, 11791188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crooks, K.R. & Sanjayan, M. (Eds). (2006) Connectivity Conservation. 728 pp. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, X., Shannon, G., Slotow, R., Page, B. & Duffy, K.J. (2007) Short-duration daytime movements of a cow herd of African elephants. Journal of Mammalogy 88, 151157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diekotter, T., Csencsics, D., Rothenbuhler, C., Billeter, R. & Edwards, P.J. (2005) Movement and dispersal patterns in the bush cricket Pholidoptera griseoaptera: the role of developmental stage and sex. Ecological Entomology 30, 419427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doak, P. (2000) Population consequences of restricted dispersal for an insect herbivore in a subdivided habitat. Ecology 81, 18281841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolman, P.M. & Fuller, R.J. (2003) The processes of species colonisation in wooded landscapes: a review of principles. pp. 2536in Humphrey, J., Newton, A., Latham, J., Gray, H., Kirby, K., Poulsom, E. & Quine, C. (Eds) The Restoration of Wooded Landscapes. Edinburgh, UK, Forestry Commission.Google Scholar
Firle, S., Bommarco, R., Ekbom, B. & Natiello, M. (1998) The influence of movement and resting behavior on the range of three carabid beetles. Ecology 79, 21132122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forestry Commission (2005) Explanatory leaflet: Jigsaw challenge. 4 pp. England, Forestry Commission.Google Scholar
Fownes, S. (2002) Effects of meadow suitability on female behaviour in the alpine butterfly Parnassius smintheus. Ecological Entomology 27, 457466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabbutt, P.D. (1959) The bionomics of the wood cricket, Nemobius sylvestris (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Journal of Animal Ecology 28, 1542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hapca, S., Crawford, J.W., MacMillan, K., Wilson, M.J. & Young, L.M. (2007) Modelling nematode movement using time-fractional dynamics. Journal of Theoretical Biology 248, 212224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hein, S., Gombert, J., Hovestadt, T. & Poethke, H.-J. (2003) Movement patterns of the bush cricket Platycleis albopunctata in different types of habitat: matrix is not always matrix. Ecological Entomology 28, 432438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, A.R., Milne, B.T. & Wiens, J.A. (1992) Diffusion in fractal landscapes: simulations and experimental studies of Tenebrionid beetle movements. Ecology 73, 19681983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kareiva, P.M. & Shigesada, N. (1983) Analyzing insect movement as a correlated random walk. Oecologia 56, 234238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levin, S.A. (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: the Robert H. MacArthur Award lecture. Ecology 73, 19431967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, J.A. & Haes, E.C.M. (1988) Grasshoppers and allied insects of Great Britain and Ireland. 252 pp. Essex, UK, Harley Books.Google Scholar
Morales, J.M. & Ellner, S.P. (2002) Scaling up animal movements in heterogeneous landscapes: the importance of behavior. Ecology 83, 22402247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morvan, R. & Campan, R. (1976) Displacement of ground crickets: conditions of acquisition and maintenance of a dominant orientation (Les deplacements du grillon des bois: conditions d'acquisition et de maintien d'une orientation dominante). Terre et la Vie 30, 276294.Google Scholar
Nams, V.O. (2006) Animal movement rates as behavioural bouts. Journal of Animal Ecology 75, 298302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NBN Gateway (2009) National biodiversity network gateway. UK, CEH and JNCC. Available on (Accessed November 2007).Google Scholar
Proess, R. & Baden, R. (2000) Survey of the orthopteran species Barbitistes serricauda (Fabricius, 1798), Leptophyes punctatissima (Bosc, 1972), Meconema thalassinum (De Geer, 1773) and Nemobius sylvestris (Bosc, 1792) in Luxembourg (Insecta, Saltatoria). Bulletin de la Societe des Naturalistes Luxembourgeois 100, 159170.Google Scholar
Richards, T.J. (1952) Nemobius sylvestris in S.E. Devon. The Entomologist 85, 8387, 108111, 136141, 161166.Google Scholar
Root, R.B. & Kareiva, P.M. (1984) The search for resources by cabbage butterflies (Pieris rapae): ecological consequences and adaptive significance of Markovian movements in a patchy environment. Ecology 65, 147165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samu, F., Sziranyi, A. & Kiss, B. (2003) Foraging in agricultural fields: local ‘sit-and-move’ strategy scales up to risk-averse habitat use in a wolf spider. Animal Behaviour 66, 939947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schtickzelle, N., Joiris, A., Van Dyck, H. & Baguette, M. (2007) Quantitative analysis of changes in movement behaviour within and outside habitat in a specialist butterfly. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, J.W. & Kirby, K.J. (1992) An inventory of ancient woodland for England and Wales. Biological Conservation 62, 7793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turchin, P. (1991) Translating foraging movements in heterogeneous environments into the spatial distribution of foragers. Ecology 72, 12531266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turchin, P. (1998) Quantitative Analysis of Movement. 396 pp. Sunderland, MA, USA, Sinauer Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Vernes, K. & Haydon, D.T. (2001) Effect of fire on northern bettong (Bettongia tropica) foraging behaviour. Austral Ecology 26, 649659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vos, C.C., Baveco, H. & Grashof-Bokdam, C.J. (2002). Corridors and species dispersal. pp. 84–104 in Gutzwiller, K.J. (Ed.) Applying Landscape Ecology in Biological Conservation. New York, USA, Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallin, H. (1991) Movement patterns and foraging tactics of a caterpillar hunter inhabiting alfalfa fields. Functional Ecology 5, 740749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallin, H. & Ekbom, B. (1994) Influence of hunger level and prey densities on movement patterns in three species of Pterostichus beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Environmental Entomology 23, 11711181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallin, H. & Ekbom, B.S. (1988) Movements of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) inhabiting cereal fields: a field tracing study. Oecologia 77, 3943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiens, J.A., Stenseth, N.C., Horne, B.V. & Ims, R.A. (1993) Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66, 369380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
With, K.A. (1994) Ontogenetic shifts in how grasshoppers interact with landscape structure: an analysis of movement patterns. Functional Ecology 8, 477485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Movement analyses of wood cricket (Nemobius sylvestris) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae)
Available formats

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Movement analyses of wood cricket (Nemobius sylvestris) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae)
Available formats

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Movement analyses of wood cricket (Nemobius sylvestris) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae)
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *