Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T18:05:35.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biological control of Bemisia argentifolii (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on poinsettia with inundative releases of Eretmocerus eremicus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae): do release rates affect parasitism?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M.S. Hoddle ,
R.G. Van Driesche ,
J.P. Sanderson  and
O.P.J.M. Minkenberg
M.S. Hoddle
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
R.G. Van Driesche
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
J.P. Sanderson
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14583, USA
O.P.J.M. Minkenberg
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effectiveness of inundative releases of the parasitoid Eretmocerus eremicus n. sp. Rose & Zolnerowich for control of Bemisia argentifolii Bellows & Perring on poinsettia in replicated experimental greenhouses was determined. We evaluated two release rates of E. eremicus: a low release rate (one female per plant per week, released in two greenhouses, in spring 1995) and a high release rate (three females per plant per week, released in two greenhouses, in spring 1994), each over a 14 week growing season. Each release trial had either one (1995) or two (1994) control greenhouses in which B. argentifolii developed on poinsettia in the absence of E. eremicus. Life-tables were constructed for B. argentifolii in the presence and absence of E. eremicus by using a photographic technique to follow cohorts of whiteflies on poinsettia leaves. Weekly population counts of whiteflies were also made. In the absence of E. eremicus, egg to adult survivorship of B. argentifolii on poinsettia was 75–81%. At the low release rate, egg to adult survivorship of B. argentifolii was 12% and parasitism was 34%. At the high release rate, egg to adult survivorship of B. argentifolii was 0.9% and parasitism was 10%. The average net reproductive rates (Ro) for populations of B. argentifolii in the absence of E. eremicus ranged from 20.5 to 26.1, indicating a rapidly increasing population density. Net reproductive rates for whitefly populations subject to parasitoid releases were 3.7 in the low release rate greenhouses, and 0.25 in the high release rate greenhouses, indicating substantially reduced B. argentifolii population growth. At week 14 of the trial, densities of immature whiteflies were lower in greenhouses at the low release rate when compared to the high release rate greenhouses. This was attributed to high levels of in-house reproduction by parasitoids at the low release rate.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 88 , Issue 1 , February 1998 , pp. 47 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellows, T.S. Jr., Van Driesche, R.G. & Elkinton, J.S. (1992) Life-table construction and analysis in the evaluation of natural enemies. Annual Review of Entomology 37, 587–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellows, T.S. Jr., Perring, T.M., Gill, R.J. & Headrick, D.H. (1994) Description of a new species of Bemisia (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, T. (1958) Effect of host distribution on the reproduction of Encarsia formosa Gahan (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Canadian Entomologist 90, 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, M., Gorman, K., Day, S. & Denholm, I. (1996) Baseline determination and detection of resistance to imidacloprid in Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 86, 343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, J.R. (1993) Applied demography for biologists with special emphasis on insects. 206 pp. OxfordOxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkinton, J.S., Buonaccorsi, J.P., Bellows, T.S. Jr & Van Driesche, R.G. (1992) Marginal attack rate, k-values and density dependence in the analysis of contemporaneous mortality factors. Researches on Population Ecology, 34, 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enkegaard, A. (1992) Bionomics of and interactions between the cotton whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Genn. (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) and its parasitoid, Encarsia formosa Gahan (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) on poinsettia in relation to biological control. 177 pp. PhD thesis, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Enkegaard, A. (1993) The poinsettia strain of cotton whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae), biological and demographic parameters on poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima) in relation to temperature. Bulletin of Entomological Research 83, 535–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foltyn, S. & Gerling, D. (1985) The parasitoids of the aleyrodid Bemisia tabaci in Israel: development, host preference and discrimination of the aphelinid wasp Eretimocerus mundus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 38, 255–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerling, D. (1966) Studies with whitefly parasites of Southern California II. Eretmocerus californicus Howard (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Canadian Entomologist 98, 1316–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerling, D. (1986) Natural enemies of Bemisia tabaci, biological characteristics and potential as biological control agents: a review. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 17, 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerling, D., Orion, T. & Delarea, Y. (1990) Eretmocerus penetration and immature development: a novel approach to overcome host immunity Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 13, 247–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerling, D., Tremblay, E. & Orion, T. (1991) Initial stages of the vital capsule formation in the Eretmocerus–Bemisia tabaci association. Redia 74, 411–415.Google Scholar
Gould, J.R., Bellows, T.S. Jr & Paine, T.D. (1992) Evaluation of biological control of Siphoninus phillyreae (Haliday) by the parasitoid Encarsia partenopea (Walker), using life-table analysis. Biological Control 2, 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Headrick, D.H., Bellows, T.S. Jr & Perring, T.M. (1995) Behaviors of female Eretmocerus sp. nr. californicus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) attacking Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on sweet potato. Environmental Entomology 24, 412–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Headrick, D.H., Bellows, T.S. Jr & Perring, T.M. (1996) Behaviors of female Eretmocerus sp. nr. californicus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) attacking Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on cotton, Gossypium hirsutum, (Malavaceae) and melon, Cucumis melo (Curcubitaceae). Biological Control 6, 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinz, K.M. & Parrella, M.P. (1994) Poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd. Ex Koltz.) cultivar-mediated differences in performance of five natural enemies of Bemisia argentifolii Bellows and Perring n. sp. (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Biological Control 4, 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoddle, M.S. & Van Driesche, R. (1996) Evaluation of Encarsia formosa (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) to control Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima): A lifetable analysis. Florida Entomologist 79, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoddle, M.S., Van Driesche, R., Roy, S., Smith, T., Mazzola, M., Lopes, P. & Sanderson, J. (1996a) A grower's guide to using biological control for silverleaf whitefly on poinsettias in the northeast United States. Floral Facts, University of Massachusetts Cooperative Extension Bulletin, 4 pp.Google Scholar
Hoddle, M.S., Van Driesche, R., Sanderson, J. & Rose, M. (1996b) A photographic technique for constructing life tables for Bemisia argentifolii(Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on poinsettia. Florida Entomologist 79, 464–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoddle, M.S., Van Driesche, R.G. & Sanderson, J.P. (1997) Biological control of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on poinsettia with inundative releases of Encarsia formosa (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae): are higher release rates necessarily better? Biological Control(in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M.S., Antolin, M.F. & Rose, M. (1996) Courtship behavior, reproductive relationships, and allozyme patterns of three north American populations of Eretmocerus nr.californicus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) parasitizing the whitefly Bemisia sp., tabaci complex (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 98, 126–137.Google Scholar
Jones, T.H. & Turner, B.D. (1987) The effect of host spatial distribution on patterns of parasitism by Nasonia vitripennis. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 44, 169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kareiva, P. (1990) The spatial dimension in pest-enemy interactions. pp. 213–227in Mackauer, M., Ehler, L.E. & Roland, J.(Eds) Critical issues in biological control. Andover, Intercept/VCH.Google Scholar
Lopes, P. (1994) What's all the talk about Marathon™? Floral Notes 7, 2–4.Google Scholar
McAuslane, H.J. & Nguyen, R. (1996) Reproductive biology and behavior of a thelytokous species of Eretmocerus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) parasitizing Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 89, 686–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minkenberg, O.P.J.M., Simmons, G.S., Malloy, R., Kaltenbach, J. & Leonard, C. (1994) Biological control of whiteflies on cotton: a reality check. Proceedings, Beltwide Cotton Production Conferences.National Cotton Council of America,Memphis. Tennessee,887–890.Google Scholar
Rose, M. & Rosen, D. (1991–1992) Eretmocerus debachi n. sp. (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), an effective parasite of Parabemisia myricae (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Israel Journal of Entomology 25–26, 199–207.Google Scholar
Rose, M. & Zolnerowich, G. (1997) Eretmocerus Haldeman (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) in the United States, with descriptions of new species attacking Bemisia (tabaci complex) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 99, 1–27.Google Scholar
Royama, T. (1981) Evaluation of mortality factors in life-table analysis. Ecological Monographs 5, 495–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, G.S. & Minkenberg, O.P.J.M. (1994) Field-cage evaluation of augmentative biological control of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in southern California cotton with the parasitoid Eretmocerus nr. californicus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Environmental Entomology 23, 1552–1557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T.R.E. (1978) Ecological methods with particular reference to the study of insect populations. 2nd edn. 524 pp. London, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Summy, K.R., Davis, M.R., Hart, W.G. & Gilstrap, F.E. (1984) Use of close-up photography in nondestructive monitoring of citrus blackfly cohorts. Journal of the Rio Grande Valley Horticultural Society 37, 55–60.Google Scholar