Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:10:07.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Capture-recapture studies with mosquitoes of the group of Anopheles punctulatus Dönitz (Diptera: Culicidae) from Papua New Guinea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. D. Charlwood ,
P. M. Graves  and
M. H. Birley
J. D. Charlwood
Affiliation:
Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, P.O. Box 378, Madang, Papua New Guinea
P. M. Graves
Affiliation:
Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, P.O. Box 378, Madang, Papua New Guinea
M. H. Birley
Affiliation:
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Five capture-recapture experiments with three species of the group of Anopheles punctulatus Dönitz were undertaken in four villages in Madang Province, Papua New Guinea. Females were collected in landing catches, blood-fed, marked with fluorescent powder according to time and location of capture, and released. Recaptures took place for 4–13 nights after release. A proportion of the recaptured mosquitoes was dissected for evidence of recent oviposition and gonotrophic age determination. Two models were developed to test a number of the assumptions that underlie the analysis of capture-recapture data from mosquitoes. Species abundance and numbers collected varied within and between villages, but marked mosquitoes dispersed at random within the mosquito population. No heterogeneity was found between indoor and outdoor biters of any of the three species. Survival rates were similar in all species. Significant differences were found in the duration of the oviposition cycle between species and village. This was 2·7–3·7 days for A. punctulatus, 2·4–3·2 days for A. koliensis Owen and 2·1–3·0 days for A. farauti Laveran. No differences were found in the duration of the oviposition cycle of nulliparous and parous females of A. farauti. Thus temporary pool breeders had a longer cycle than permanent pool breeders. This tended to be due to a delay in returning to feed rather than a delay in oviposition. It is concluded that differences between local environments exert a greater influence on the duration of the oviposition cycle than do species specific differences.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 76 , Issue 2 , June 1986 , pp. 211 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afifi, S. E. D., Spencer, M., Hudson, P. B. & Tavil, N. W. (1980). Biting prevalence and malaria transmission patterns in the Anopheles punctulatus complex (Diptera: Culicidae) in Papua New Guinea.—Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 58, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belkin, J. N. (1962). The mosquitoes of the South Pacific (Diptera, Culicidae). Vols. 1 & 2.—608 & 412 pp. Berkeley, Univ. Calif. Press.Google Scholar
Birley, M. (1977). The estimation of insect density and instar survivorship functions from census data.—J. Anim. Ecol. 46, 497–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birley, M. H. (1979). The estimation and simulation of variable developmental period, with application to the mosquito Aedes aegypti (L.).—Researches Popul. Ecol. 21, 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birley, M. H. (1984). Estimation, tactics and disease transmission.—pp. 272–289 in Conway, G. R. (Ed.). Pest and pathogen control: strategic, tactical and policy models.—488 pp. Chichester, Wiley (IIASA international series on applied systems analysis no. 13).Google Scholar
Birley, M. H. & Boorman, J. P. T. (1982). Estimating the survival and biting rates of haematophagous insects, with particular reference to the Culicoides obsoletus group (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) in southern England.—J. Anim. Ecol. 51, 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, J. H. & Coluzzi, M. (1971). Cytogenetic observations on Anopheles farauti Laveran.—Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 45, 266–267.Google ScholarPubMed
Cattani, J., Tulloch, J., Vrbova, H., Jolley, D., Gibson, F. D., Moir, J. S., Heywood, P. F., Alpers, M. P., Stevenson, A. & Clancy, R. (1986). The epidemiology of malaria in a population surrounding Madang, Papua New Guinea.—Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 35, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlwood, J. D. (1984). What way now for malaria control?—Papua New Guin. med. J. 27, 159–162.Google ScholarPubMed
Charlwood, J. D. (1985). The influence of larval habitat on the ecology and behaviour of females of the Anopheles punctulatus group of mosquitoes from Papua New Guinea.—pp. 399–406in Lounibos, L. P., Rey, J. R. & Frank, J. H. (Eds.). Mosquito ecology: proceedings of a Workshop, Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory, Vero Beach, Florida.Google Scholar
Charlwood, J. D. (in press). Variation in the survival rates of Anopheles farauti (Diptera: Culicidae) from coastal Papua New Guinea.—J. med. Entomol.Google Scholar
Charlwood, J. D. & Galgal, K. (1985). Observations on the biology and behaviour of Armigeres milnensis Lee from Papua New Guinea.—J. Aust. ent. Soc. 24, 313–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlwood, J. D., Dagoro, H. & Paru, R. (1985a). Blood-feeding and resting behaviour in the Anopheles punctulatus Dönitz complex (Diptera: Culicidae) from coastal Papua New Guinea.—Bull. ent. Res. 75, 463–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlwood, J. D., Birley, M. H., Dagoro, H., Paru, R., & Holmes, P. R. (1985b). Assessing survival rates of Anopheles farauti (Diptera: Culicidae) from Papua New Guinea—J. Anim. Ecol. 54, 1003–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coluzzi, M., Sabatini, A., Petrarca, V. & Di Deco, M. A. (1977). Behavioural divergences between mosquitoes with different inversion karyotypes in polymorphic populations of the Anopheles gambiae complex.—Nature, Lond. 266, 832–833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coluzzi, M., Sabatini, A., Petrarca, V. & Di Deco, M. A. (1979). Chromosomal differentiation and adaptation to human environments in the Anopheles gambiae complex.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 73, 483–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Detinova, T. S. (1962). Age-grouping methods in Diptera of medical importance. With special reference to some vectors of malaria.—Monograph Ser. WHO. No. 47, 216 pp.Google ScholarPubMed
Gillies, M. T. & Wilkes, T. J. (1965). A study of the age-composition of populations of Anopheles gambiae Giles and A. funestus Giles in north-eastern Tanzania.—Bull. ent. Res. 56, 237–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laird, M. (1946). Observations on Anopheles punctulatus Dönitz, 1901, and Anopheles farauti Laveran, 1902, at Palmalmal and Manginuna, New Britain, during July and August, 1945.—Trans. R. Soc. N. Z. 76, 148–157.Google Scholar
Mackerras, M. J. & Lemerle, T. H. (1949). Laboratory breeding of Anopheles punctulatus punctulatus Dönitz.—Bull. ent. Res. 40, 27–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahon, R. J. & Miethke, P. M. (1982). Anopheles farauti No. 3, a hitherto unrecognized biological species of mosquito within the taxon A. farauti Laveran (Diptera: Culicidae).—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 76, 8–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owen, W. B. (1945). A new anopheline from the Solomon Islands with notes on its biology.—J. Parasit. 31, 236–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, W. & Standfast, J. A. (1960). Studies on the epidemiology of malaria in New Guinea. Part II. Holoendemic malaria—the entomological picture.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 54, 249–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rawlings, P. & Curtis, C. F. (1982). Tests for the existence of genetic variability in the tendency of Anopheles culicifaces species B to rest in houses and to bite man.—Bull. Wid Hlth Org. 60, 427–432.Google Scholar
Reisen, W. K., Aslam, Y., Siddiqui, T. F. & Khan, A. Q. (1978). A mark-release-recapture experiment with Culex tritaeniorhynchus Giles.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 72, 167–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Service, M. W. (1976). Mosquito ecology. Field sampling methods.—583 pp. London, Applied Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Slooff, R. (1961). Field observations on the biting activity of Anopheles koliensis Owen.—Trop. geogr. Med. 13, 67–76.Google Scholar
Slooff, R. (1964). Observations on the effect of residual DDT house-spraying on behaviour and mortality of the Anopheles punctulatus group.—144 pp. Univ. Leyden.Google Scholar
Slooff, R. & Herath, P. R. J. (1980). Ovarian development and biting frequency in Anopheles culicifacies Giles in Sri Lanka.—Trop. geogr. Med. 32, 306–311.Google ScholarPubMed
Spencer, M. (1977). Bionomics and behaviour patterns of the Anopheles punctulatus complex (Diptera: Culicidae) in the D'Entrecasteaux Islands, Papua.—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 101, 120–143.Google Scholar
Spencer, T., Spencer, M. & Venters, D. (1974). Malaria vectors in Papua New Guinea.—Papua New Guin. med. J. 17, 22–30.Google Scholar
Wilkes, T. J. & Charlwood, J. D. (1979). A rapid gonotrophic cycle in Chagasia bonneae from Brazil.—Mosquito News 39, 137–139.Google Scholar