Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T03:52:11.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetics of house-entering behaviour in East African populations of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae) and its relevance to speciation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. Trpis  and
W. Hausermann
M. Trpis
Affiliation:
Vector Biology Laboratory, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA
W. Hausermann
Affiliation:
Vector Biology Laboratory, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Samples of larvae of Aedes aegypti (L.) were collected in three principal habitats, domestic, peridomestic and feral, in the Rabai area in eastern Kenya. The samples from the domestic habitat represent the population of the domestic form, A. a. aegypti, and the feral samples from tree holes from Bejumwa Forest represent the feral subspecies, A. a. formosus (Wlk.). The peridomestic samples from steps cut into trunks of coconut palms most probably represent hybrids between the domestic and the feral forms. These samples were brought to the laboratory where they reproduced in high numbers, and crosses were made between the three populations. Adults of the parental populations and those resulting from the crosses were marked with different colours of fluorescent pigments, released in the peridomestic habitat in the Rabai area and subsequently recaptured in biting catches on man in the domestic and peridomestic habitats. The results indicate that domesticity, particularly house-entering behaviour, in A. aegypti is genetically controlled and is a product of the action of several genes. The gene action in terms of house-entering behaviour is additive as can be clearly seen from the recapture data for the various crosses. The percentage entering houses was highest among mosquitoes of the form from inside houses (the domestic A. a. aegypti population (D)) and the percentages decreased progressively through the peridomestic (P) and hybrid forms to the feral population of A. a. formosus (F) in the following manner: D (45·)DP (15 ·5), PD (13·9), P (9·8), DF (5·7), FD (73·), PF (1·5), FP. (0·6) and F (0·6).The recaptures outdoors were in the reverse order, the highest percentage being for F (187·) and the lowest for D (8·5), DP (8·0) and PD (7·7). The data suggest that the larvae from the peridomestic habitat may represent hybrids between the domestic and feral forms

A model for the inheritance of behavioural characters in mosquitoes is presented. On the basis of isolating mechanisms and partial hybridisation, it is concluded that A. a. aegypti and A. a. formosus have developed as geographically isolated allopatric populations. This supports the existing polytypic concept of speciation in A. aegypti. Spatial distribution, non-random mating and the existing series of isolating mechanisms indicate that the domestic type form has been introduced into East Africa, most probably on ships.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 68 , Issue 3 , September 1978 , pp. 521 - 532
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Christophers, S. R. (1960). Aëdes aegypti (L.), the yellow fever mosquito. Its life history, bionomics and structure.—739 pp. Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Craig, G. B. & Gillham, N. W. (1959). The inheritance of larval pigmentation in Aedes aegypti.—J. Hered. 50, 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, G. B. & Vandehey, R. C. (1962). Genetic variability in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). I. Mutations affecting color pattern.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 55, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crovello, T. J. & Hacker, C. S. (1972). Evolutionary strategies in life table characteristics among feral and urban strains of Aedes aegypti (L.).—Evolution 26, 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, F. W. (1932). Diptera, family ulicidae.—Genera Insect. fasc. 194, 249 pp.Google Scholar
Gillett, J. D. (1955a). Variation in the hatching-response of Aëdes eggs (Diptera: Culicidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 46, 241–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillett, J. D. (1955b). The inherited basis of variation in the hatching-response of Aëdes eggs (Diptera: Culicidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 46, 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillett, J. D. (1956). Genetic differences affecting egg laying in the mosquito Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Linnaeus).—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 50, 362–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hausermann, W. (1973). Population dynamics of Aedes aegypti in East Africa in view of genetic control.—Ninth Int. Congr. Trop. Med. Malaria, Athens, 10 14–21 1973. Vol. 1. Abstracts of invited papers, p. 9.Google Scholar
Hausermann, W. & Trpis, M. (1977). A mosquito behavior fractionator—Mosquito News 37, 109–114.Google Scholar
Lumsden, W. H. R. (1955). An epidemic of virus disease in Southern Province, Tanganyika territory, in 1952–53. II: General description and epidemiology.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 49, 33–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machado-Allison, C. E. (1971). Genetic differences among subspecies of Aedes aegypti (L.) and their evolutionary implications.—Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Machado-Allison, C. E. & Craig, G. B. (1972). Geographic variation in resistance to dessication in Aedes aegypti and A. atropalpus.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 65, 542–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, A. (1967). Genes and the evolution of insect behavior, pp. 44–60 in Hirsch, J. (Ed.). Behavior genetic analysis.—522 pp. New York, McGraw Hill Book Co.Google Scholar
Mattingly, P. F. (1957). Genetical aspects of the Aedes aegypti problem. I. Taxonomy and bionomics.—Ann trop. Med. Parasit. 51, 392–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, P. F. (1958). Genetical aspects of the Aedes aegypti problem. II. Disease relationships, genetics and control.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 52, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattingly, P. F. (1967). Genetical of behaviour, pp. 553–566 in Wright, J. W. & Pal, R. (Eds.). Genetics of insect vectors of disease.—794 pp. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1958). Behavior and systematics, pp. 341–362 in Roe, A. & Simpson, G. G. (Eds.). Behavior and evolution.—557 pp. New Haven, Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1960). The emergence of evolutionary novelties, pp. 349–380in Tax, S. (Ed.). Evolution after Darwin. Vol. 1.—629 pp. Chicago, Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1970). Population species, and evolution.—453 pp. The Belknap Press, Harvard Univ., Cambridge.Google Scholar
McClelland, G. A. H. (1962). Genetical control of abdominal scale color in Aedes aegypti.—Bull. ent. Soc. Am. 8, 163.Google Scholar
McClelland, G. A. H. (1967). Speciation and evolution in Aedes, pp. 277–311 in Wright, J. W. & Pal, R. (Eds.). Genetics of insect vectors of diseases.—794 pp. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
McClelland, G. A. H. (1974). A worldwide survey of variation in scale pattern of the abdominal tergum of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae).—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 126, 239–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouchet, J. (1970). Survey of Aedes aegypti and other yellow fever vectors in Somalia and the French territory of the Afars and Issas.—WHO/VBC/70.185:1–12.Google Scholar
Paterson, H. E. (1976). Aedes aegypti complex in Africa.—Nature, Lond. 259, 252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, J. A. & McClelland, G. A. H. (1975). Electrophoretic differences between sympatric ecotypes.—Nature, Lond. 256, 405–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trpis, M. (1972). Dry season survival of Aedes aegypti eggs in various breeding sites in the Dar es Salaam area, Tanzania.—Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 47, 433–437.Google Scholar
Trpis, M. (1977). Autogeny in diverse populations of Aedes aegypti from East Africa.—Z. Tropenmed. Parasit. 28, 77–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Trpis, M., Hartberg, W. K., Teesdale, C. & McClelland, G. A. H. (1971). Aedes aegypti and Aedes simpsoni breeding in coral rock holes on the coast of Tanzania.—Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 45, 529–531.Google ScholarPubMed
Trpis, M. & Hausermann, W. (1975). Demonstration of differential domesticity of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera, Culicidae) in Africa by mark-release-recapture.—Bull. ent. Res. 65, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar