Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:40:21.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ovarian development in females of the Australian sheep blowfly Lucilia cuprina (Diptera: Calliphoridae) fed on sheep faeces and the effect of ivermectin residues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

David F. Cook
David F. Cook*
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Entomology, Canberra, Australia
*
WA Department of Agriculture, Baron-Hay Court, South Perth WA 6151, Australia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study demonstrates that only a proportion of Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) females, which have fed exclusively on sheep dung collected from spring improved pastures, are able to mature a complement of oocytes at the cost of high resorption. Fifty percent of females developed mature oocytes after 11 d of continuous feeding on sheep dung. After 14 d feeding, 80% of females had matured an average of 143 eggs. Females given ad lib access to sheep's liver developed mature oocytes within 2–3 d feeding, producing an average of 223 eggs. Results show that sheep dung is a resource used by L. cuprina adults, but by itself appears to be a poor source of protein for field females to mature oocytes. Females given continuous access to dung collected from sheep 18 h after being drenched with ivermectin, were virtually unable to develop oocytes beyond the resting stage after 10 d feeding. Female adults in particular, became distended with fluid over successive days feeding and both sexes suffered significantly higher mortality compared with adults fed on untreated sheep dung. Knowledge on the feeding frequency and amounts of sheep dung ingested by L. cuprina adults may enable an assessment of the potential for manipulation of ivermectin treatment in a control strategy.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , September 1991 , pp. 249 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R.S. & Mulla, M.S. (1967) The reproductive biology of Hippelates collusor (Diptera: Chloropidae). II. Gametogenesis. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 60, 1177–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, G.W. & Dudzinski, M.L. (1978) Ethology of free-ranging domestic animals. 198 pp. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Barton Browne, L. (1979) The behaviour and nutritional requirements of adults of Lucilia cuprina – possibilities for modification. pp. 45–57in National Symposium on the sheep blowfly and flystrike in sheep. New South Wales Department of Agriculture, Sydney.Google Scholar
Barton Browne, L., Bartell, R.J., Van Gerwen, A.C.M. & Lawrence, L.A. (1976) Relationship between protein ingestion and sexual receptivity in females of the Australian sheep blowfly Lucilia cuprina. Physiological Entomology 1, 235–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton Browne, L., Van Gerwen, A.C.M. & Roberts, J.A. (1986) Ovarian development in females of the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina, given limited opportunity to feed on protein-rich material at different ages. International Journal of Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 10, 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton Browne, L., Van Gerwen, A.C.M. & Smith, P.H. (1987) Relationship between mated status of females and their stage of ovarian development in field populations of the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 77, 609–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton Browne, L., Van Gerwen, A.C.M. & Vogt, W.G. (1990) Protein acquisition and mating by females of the Australian sheep blowfly Lucilia cuprina in the field. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 55, 191–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton Browne, L., Van Gerwen, A.C.M. & Williams, K.L. (1979) Oocyte resorption during ovarian development in the blowfly Lucilia cuprina. Journal of Insect Physiology 25, 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benz, G.W. (1985) Animal health applications of ivermectin. Southwestern Entomologist Supplement 7, 43–50.Google Scholar
Berlyn, A.D. (1979) The effect of diet on the life-span and egg maturation of caged adult sheep headflies, Hydrotaea irritans (Fallén) (Diptera: Muscidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 69, 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, W.C., Fisher, M.H., Stapley, E.O., Albers-Schonberg, G. & Jacob, T.A. (1983) Ivermectin: a potent new antiparasitic agent. Science 221, 823–828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clift, A.D. & McDonald, F.J.D. (1976) Some relationships between diet and ovarian development in Lucilia cuprina (Wied.) (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Australian Journal of Zoology 24, 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, G.G., Kitching, R.L., Vogt, W.G. & Whitten, M.J. (1975) Sheep blowfly and its control in the pastoral ecosystem of Australia. Proceedings of the Ecological Society of Australia 9, 213–229.Google Scholar
Fraser, A., Ring, R.A. & Stewart, R.K. (1961) Intestinal proteinases in an insect, Calliphora vomitoria L. Nature, London 192, 999–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanski, I. (1987) Nutritional ecology of dung and carrionfeeding insects. pp. 837–884in Slansky, F. Jr & Rodriguez, J.G. (Eds) Nutritional ecology of insects, mites, spiders and related invertebrates. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Hilder, E.J. (1965) Distribution of excreta by sheep at pasture. Proceedings of the International Grasslands Congress (Helsinki), 977–981.Google Scholar
Houlding, B., Ridsdill-Smith, T.J. & Bailey, W.J. (1991) Injectable abamectin causes a delay in scarabaeine dung beetle egg-laying in cattle dung. Australian Veterinary Journal 68, 185–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hume, I.D. & Purser, D.B. (1974) Ruminal and post-ruminal protein digestion in sheep fed on subterranean clover harvested at four stages of maturity. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, P.S., Picton, J. & Riek, R.F. (1980) Insecticidal action of the avermectins. Veterinary Record 106, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitching, R.L. (1974) Controlling the sheep blowfly. Australian Natural History 18, 122–127.Google Scholar
Kitching, R.L. (1977) Time, resources and population dynamics in insects. Australian Journal of Ecology 2, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, J.J. & Hedges, D.A. (1979) The influence of shape of paddock, type of fence and stocking rate on grazing behaviour and social facilitation in Merino sheep. Applied Animal Ethology 5, 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, J.J., Mottershead, B.E. & Alexander, G. (1980) Sheltering behaviour and lamb mortality amongst shorn Merino ewes lambing in paddocks with a restricted area of shelter. Applied Animal Ethology 6, 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGarry, J.W. (1988) Effects of low doses of ivermectin and fenthion on egg laying by Lucilia sericata (Meigen) (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Insect Science and its Application 9, 421–425.Google Scholar
Mackerras, M.J. (1933) Observations on the life-histories, nutritional requirements and fecundity of blowflies. Bulletin of Entomological Research 24, 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, M., Nielsen, B.O., Holter, P., Pedersen, O.C., Jespersen, J.B., Vagn Jensen, K.-M., Nansen, P. & Gronvold, J. (1990) Treating cattle with ivermectin: effects on the fauna and decomposition of dung pats. Journal of Applied Ecology 27, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahon, R.J. & Wardhaugh, K.G. (1991) Impact of dung from ivermectin treated sheep on oogenesis and survival of adult Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Australian Veterinary Journal 68, 173–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, K.R. (1959) The ecology of sheep blowflies in Australia. pp. 514–544in Biogeography and ecology in Australia. (Series Monographiae Biologicae, Volume 8). Melbourne, CSIRO.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, K.R. (1965) The bionomics of blowflies. Annual Review of Entomology 10, 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Readshaw, J.L. & Van Gerwen, A.C.M. (1983) Age-specific survival, fecundity and fertility of the adult blowfly, Lucilia cuprina, in relation to crowding, protein food and population cycles. Journal of Animal Ecology 52, 879–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridsdill-Smith, T.J. (1988) Survival and reproduction of the bushfly and a scarabaeine dung beetle in dung of cattle treated with avermectin B1. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 27, 175–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, J.A. & Kitching, R.L. (1974) Ingestion of sugar, protein and water by adult Lucilia cuprina (Wied.) (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 64, 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roncalli, R.A. (1989) Environmental aspects of use of ivermectin and abamectin in livestock: effects on cattle dung fauna. pp. 173–181in Campbell, W.C. (Ed.) Ivermectin and abamectin. New York, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, C.D. (1983) Activity of avermectin against selected insects in ageing manure. Environmental Entomology 12, 455–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P.H., Dallwitz, R., Wardhaugh, K.G., Vogt, W.G. & Woodburn, T.L. (1981) Timing of larval exodus from sheep and carrion in the sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 30, 157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speedy, A.W. & Bazely, D. (1986) Grass as a feed for sheep-its potential and limitations. pp. 29–48in Pollott, G.E. (Ed.) Occasional Symposium 21, British Grassland Society. Oxford, Department of Agricultural Science, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Strong, L. (1989) Sequential latent effects of a sub-lethal dose of ivermectin in Calliphora vomitoria L. Pesticide Science 27, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, L. & Brown, T.A. (1987) Avermectins in insect control and biology: a review. Bulletin of Entomological Research 77, 357–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, J.A. (1967) Understanding farm animals: an introduction to the science of animal production. 233 pp. Sydney, Halstead.Google Scholar
Vogt, W.G. & Woodburn, T.L. (1982). Dispersal of post-feeding larvae of Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 21, 289–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, W.G., Woodburn, T.L., Ellem, B.A., Van Gerwen, A.C.M., Barton Browne, L. & Wardhaugh, K.G. (1985) The relationship between fecundity and oocyte resorption in field populations of Lucilia cuprina. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 39, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, R. & Strong, L. (1987) Environmental consequences of treating cattle with the antiparasitic drug ivermectin. Nature, London 327, 418–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wardhaugh, K.G. & Mahon, R.J. (1991) Avermectin residues in sheep and cattle dung and their effects on dung-beetle colonisation, reproduction and dung burial. Bulletin of Entomological Research 81, 333–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardhaugh, K.G., Read, P. & Neave, M. (1984) A sticky-trap for studying the spatial distribution of the Australian sheep blowfly Lucilia cuprina. Australian Veterinary Journal 61, 132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wardhaugh, K.G. & Rodriguez-Menendez, H. (1988) The effects of the anti-parasitic drug, ivermectin, on the development and survival of the dung breeding fly, Orthelia cornicina (F.) and the scarabaeine dung beetles, Copris hispanus L., Bubas bubulas (Oliver) and Onitis belial F. Journal of Applied Entomology 106, 381–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, L.G. (1958) Nutrition and reproduction in the Australian sheep blowfly Lucilia cuprina. Australian Journal of Zoology 6, 139–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodburn, T.L. & Vogt, W.G. (1982) Attractiveness of merino sheep before and after death to adults of the Australian sheep blowfly Lucilia cuprina. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 21, 244–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodburn, T.L., Vogt, W.G. & Kitching, R.L. (1978) Estimation of age of females in field populations of Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) using ambient temperature and solar radiation. Bulletin of Entomological Research 68, 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar