Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T14:16:27.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relationship between the Stage of Development and Susceptibility to DDT and the Pyrethrins of Diataraxia oleracea (L.), Tenebrio molitor L., and Periplaneta americana (L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

T. D. Mukerjea
T. D. Mukerjea
Affiliation:
Department of Insecticides and Fungicides, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A review of the literature is given which shows that changes in the susceptibility ofinsects to insecticides occur during development when the poison is applied as a fumigant, as a stomach poison and as a contact poison.

The assessment of changes in susceptibility to contact poisons is discussed. The basis of assessment may be the concentration required to kill a given number of individuals, or the amount of poison required to kill unit weight of insect material. The great majority of the earlier work used the former basis of assessment, but where the insect is changing in size and shape during development and hence changing in the proportion of surface area to body weight, this method has limited significance when the poison is applied as a spray of constant deposit evenly over the surface area. A mathematical method is given for transforming the results obtained in terms of concentration to kill a given number of individuals into weights of poison to kill unit weight of insect material. Rearingmethods are outlined which enable batches of various stages of Diataraxia oleracea (L.) (tomato moth), Tenebrio molitor L. (meal worm) and Periplaneta americana (L.) (American cockroach) to be obtained at a known age and stage of development.

Experimental results are given for a spraying technique using DDT and the pyrethrins as insecticides on the comparative resistance of the eggs, larvae and pupae of D. oleracea, the larvae, pupae and adults of T. molitor and the nymphs and adults of P. americana.

On the basis of the concentration of insecticide required to kill a given percentage of individuals, it is shown that great differences can occur in the resistance of different instars of one species and considerable differences may occur within the instar. If the data for the larval and nymphal instars are considered on the basis of the weight of poison required to kill unit weight of insect material, differences still exist but are much reduced.

When toxicity is estimated on the basis of the concentration of poison in a constant spray deposit required to kill a given percentage of individuals the overall variations of resistance during development measured for DDT in terms of median lethal concentrations were: —D. oleracea eggs and larvae fifty times (0·002 per cent.–0·1 per cent. w/v), the pupa proved resistant to 0·5 per cent, w/v; T. molitor larvae, pupae and adults thirty-seven and a half times (0·0008 per cent.–0·03 per cent, w/v.) and P. americana nymphs and adults eight and a half times (0·0035 per cent.–0·03 per cent. w/v). The figures for pyrethrins were: D. oleracea eggs, larvae and pupae thirty-seven times (0·0027 per cent.–0·1 per cent. w/v), T. molitor larvae, pupae and adult forty times (0·005 per cent.–0·2 per cent. w/v), and P. americana nymphs and adults ten times (0·00031 per cent.–0·003 per cent. w/v).

The figures show that the range of variation of resistance during development may be very large, over 250 times in the case of DDT and D. oleracea, where the pupa, is resistant. The maximum variation that was found within an instar was 16·6 times where the resistance to pyrethrins of the 1-day old pupa of T. molitor was compared with that of the 4-day old pupa. The data show that the amount of variation in resistance that can occur varies with the test species and with the insecticide. Furthermore that the order of resistance of the developmental stages of any given species will differ with the insecticide and that with any given insecticide the order will vary with the species.

It may be inferred from these data that any comparison between insecticides on one stage of development of one instar of one species will not necessarily hold true of any other stage of development of that species or of any other species.

Observations were made on the action of the insecticides on the various instars and the symptoms of poisoning are described. It was observed that DDT at the highest concentration used (0·075 per cent. w/v) failed to prevent the development of the embryo inside the egg-shell and death only occurred after the fully developed embryo had eaten the egg-shell which it normally does prior to emergence. Pyrethrins on the other hand if applied at sufficiently high concentrations could prevent embryonic development although at lower concentrations a high percentage of eggs formed fully developed embryos.

At the highest concentrations used neither DDT (0·5 per cent, w/v.) nor the pyrethrins (2·5 per cent, w/v.) were able to prevent pupal development, and partial emergence often occurred before death. DDT differed from the pyrethrins in that it was ineffective on the pupae of D. oleracea.

Using data given in the literature and from some preliminary experiments on respiration rates, it was possible to deduce some correlation between metabolic rate and susceptibility, and changes in the permeability of the cuticle and chorion and susceptibility, but the evidence is unsatisfactory and the causes of the changes in susceptibility await further detailed investigation.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , May 1953 , pp. 121 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beament, J. W. L. (1949). The penetration of insect egg-shells. II. The properties and permeability of sub-chorial membranes during development of Rhodnius prolixus, Stål.—Bull. ent. Res., 39, pp. 467–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodine, J. H. (1929). Factors influencing the rate of respiratory metabolism of a developing egg (Orthoptera).—Physiol. Zoöl., 2, pp. 459–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkholder, J. R. (1934). A quantitative study of respiratory metabolism in single developing eggs (Orthoptera).—Physiol. Zoöl., 7, pp. 247–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushland, R. C. (1939). Volatile oils as ovicides for the screw worm, Cochliomyia americana. C. & P.—J. econ. Ent., 32, pp. 430–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busvine, J. R. (1938). The toxicity of ethylene oxide to Calandra oryzae, C. granaria, Tribolium castaneum, and Cimex lectularius.—Ann. appl. Biol., 25, pp. 605–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, F. L. (1926). Relative susceptibility to arsenic in successive instars of the silkworm.—J. gen. Physiol., 9, pp. 727–733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, P. J. & Pearce, G. W. (1949). Susceptibility of winter eggs of the European Red Mite to petroleum oils and dinitro compounds.—J. econ. Ent., 42, pp. 44–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotton, R. T. (1932). The relation of respiratory metabolism of insects to their susceptibility to fumigants.—J. econ. Ent., 25, pp. 1088–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Chanois, F. R. (1947). Toxicity of gamma-benzene hexachloride to pre-imaginal stages of the housefly.—J. econ. Ent., 40, pp. 749–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, D. E. (1925). Metabolism during embryonic and metamorphic development of insects.—J. gen. Physiol., 7, pp. 527–543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gough, H. C. (1939). Factors affecting the resistance of the flour beetle, Tribolium confusum Duv., to hydrogen cyanide.—Ann. appl. Biol., 26, pp. 533–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunderson, H. & Strand, A. L. (1939). Toxicity of hydrogen cyanide, chloropicrin and ethylene oxide to eggs, nymphs and adults of the bed bug.—J. econ. Ent., 32, pp. 106–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harries, F. H., DeCoursey, J. D. & Hofmaster, R. N. (1945). Some factors affecting the insecticidal action of pyrethrum extracts on the beet leaf-hopper.—J. agric. Res., 71, pp. 553–565.Google Scholar
Hough, W. S. & Jefferson, R. N. (1936). Tests of insecticidal efficiency of some contact sprays against codling moth eggs.—J. econ. Ent., 29, pp. 537–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, H. (1943). Principles of insecticidal action as a guide to drug reactivity phase distribution relationships.—Trans. Faraday Soc., 39, pp. 390–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Hutzel, J. M. (1942). Action of pyrethrum upon the German cockroach.—J. econ. Ent., 35, pp. 933–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Klinger, H. (1936). Die insektizide Wirkung von Pyrethrum—und Derrisgiften und ihre Abhängigkeit vom Insektenkörper.—Arb. physiol. angew. Ent. Berl., 3, pp. 49–69, 115–151.Google Scholar
*Krogh, A. (1914). On the rate of development and CO2 production of chrysalides of Tenebrio molitor at different temperatures.—Z. allg. Physiol., 16, pp. 178–190.Google Scholar
Lindgren, D. L. (1935). The respiration of insects in relation to the heating and the fumigation of grain.—Tech. Bull. Minn. agric. Exp. Sta., no. 109, 32 pp.Google Scholar
Ludwig, D. (1946). The effect of DDT on the metabolism of the Japanese beetle, Popillia japonica Newman.—Ann. ent. Soc. Amer., 39, pp. 496–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGovran, E. R. & Fales, J. H. (1942). Roach testing.—Soap & sanit. Chem., 18, no. 3, pp. 101, 103, 105, 107, 117.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A. H. (1947). Relation between particle size and shape of insecticidal suspensions and their contact toxicity. I. DDT suspensions against Tribolium castaneum Hb.—Ann. appl. Biol., 34, pp. 586–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Melvin, R. (1926). Oxygen consumption of insect eggs.—Biol. Bull., 55, pp. 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newcommer, E. J. & Yothers, M. A. (1932). Experiments with insecticides for codling-moth control.—Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric., no. 281, 28 pp.Google Scholar
Parker, B. M. & Campbell, F. L. (1940). Relative susceptibility of the oötheca and adult female of the German cockroach to liquid household insecticides.—J. econ. Ent., 33, pp. 610–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepper, J. H. & Hastings, E. (1943). Age variations in exoskeletal composition of the sugar beet webworm and their possible effect on membrane permeability.—J. econ. Ent., 36, pp. 633–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, C. (1952). An improved laboratory apparatus for applying direct sprays and surface films, with data on the electrostatic charge on atomised spray fluids.—Ann. appl. Biol., 39, pp. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, C. & Gillham, E. M. (1946). Effects of atmospheric environment, before and after treatment, on the toxicity to insects of contact poisons. I.—Ann. appl. Biol., 33, pp. 142–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, C. & Tattersfield, F. (1943). Ovicidal properties of certain insecticides of plant origin (nicotine, pyrethrins, derris products).—Bull. ent. Res., 34, pp. 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, G. G. (1942). The penetration of pyrethrum through the cuticle of the tick Ornithodorus moubata Murray (Argasidae).—Parasitology, 34, pp. 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simanton, W. A. & Miller, A. C. (1937). Housefly age as a factor in susceptibility to pyrethrum sprays.—J. econ. Ent., 30, pp. 917–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E. H. & Pearce, G. W. (1948). The mode of action of petroleum oils as ovicides.—J. econ. Ent., 41, pp. 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun(Yun-pei), . (1947). An analysis of some important factors affecting the results of fumigation tests on insects.—Tech. Bull. Minn. agric. Exp. Sta., no. 177, 104 pp.Google Scholar
Tattersfield, F. & Potter, C. (1943). Biological methods of determining the insecticidal values of pyrethrum preparations (particularly extracts in heavy oil).—Ann. appl. Biol., 30, pp. 259–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, I. R. (1927). Oxygen consumption of individual pupae during metamorphosis.—J. Morph., 44, pp. 313–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, I. R. & Steinbach, H. B. (1931). Respiratory metabolism during pupal development of Galleria mellonella (bee moth).—Physiol. Zoöl., 4, pp. 604–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Tobias, J., Kollros, J. & Savit, J. (1946). Relation of absorbability to the comparative toxicity of DDT for insects and mammals.—J. Pharmacol., 86, pp. 287–293.Google Scholar
Tuma, V. (1938). Roaches. A study of the relationship between the ages of cockroaches and their resistance to insecticides.—Soap & sanit. Chem., 14, no. 6, p.p. 109–111, 113, 115,117, 151.Google Scholar
Way, M. J. (1950). The structure and development of the larval cuticle of Diataraxia oleracea (Lepidoptera).—Quart. J. micr. Sci., 91, pp. 145–182.Google ScholarPubMed
Way, M. J., Hopkins, B. & Smith, P. M. (1949). Photoperiodism and diapause in insects.—Nature, Lond., 164, p. 615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Way, M. J., Smith, P. M. & Hopkins, B. (1951). The selection and rearing of leaf-eating insects for use as test subjects in the study of insecticides.—Bull. ent. Res., 42, pp. 331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1934). Insect physiology, p. 78. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1942). Some notes of the integument of insects in relation to the entry of contact insecticides.—Bull. ent. Res., 33, pp. 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1948). The structure and deposition of the cuticle of adult mealworm, Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera).—Quart. J. micr. Sci., 89, pp. 197–217.Google Scholar
Woodbury, E. N. (1938). Test methods on roaches.—Soap & sanit. Chem., 14, no. 8, pp. 86–90, 107,109.Google Scholar
Yosida, M. (1948). Toxicity of pyrethrin to certain insect larvae at their different stages of growth. [In Japanese with an English summary.]—Botyu-Kagaku, no. 10, pp. 60–68.Google Scholar