Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T03:53:23.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in populations of the introduced pollinating weevil (Elaeidobius kamerunicus) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and its impact on fruitset of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

K. Dhileepan
K. Dhileepan*
Affiliation:
Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kerala, India
*
K. Dhileepan, Victorian Institute of Animal Sciences, Department of Agriculture, 475 Mickleham Road, Attwood, Vic 3049, Australia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The introduced pollinating weevil, Elaeidobius kamerunicus Faust, established itself well in the oil palm plantations in India, but the population fluctuated between seasons reaching its lowest level during the dry season. The wet season was more favourable for the population build-up of E. kamerunicus. As the weevil population in the male inflorescence did not represent the actual numbers present at a given time, an estimation of pollinator force as well as the population size is recommended. Fruitset increased significantly after the introduction of E. kamerunicus, but fluctuated widely between seasons. However, the fluctuation in populations in the male inflorescences, as well as the variation in the number visiting the female inflorescences, did not have any impact on the fruitset. During the dry season when the weevil population was very low, fruitset was high, but during the wet season when the weevil population was very high, the fruitset was lower. Availability of male inflorescences as well as climatic factors such as rainfall, number of rainy days and relative humidity affected the pollinating efficiency of the weevil by reducing the pollen load and its viability. Even though there was a population decline of E. kamerunicus during the dry season there was no reduction in pollinating efficiency and hence there is no need to introduce additional pollinators such as E. subvittatus Faust, which is more efficient during dry seasons.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 84 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 477 - 485
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birch, S. (1948) The intrinsic rate of natural increase in an insect population. Journal of Animal Ecology 17, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chairani, M. & Taniputra, B. (1985) The effects of the pollinating weevil Elneidobius kamerunicus on the bunch components of the oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Bulletin Balai Penelitian Perkabundan Madan 16 (2), 67–75.Google Scholar
Corrado, F. (1985) Confirmation of oil palm bunches (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) in certain Colombian plantations. Oleagineux 40, 173–187.Google Scholar
Dhileepan, K. (1992) Pollen carrying capacity, pollen load and pollen transferring ability of the oil palm pollinating weevil Elaeidobius kamerunicus Faust in India. Oleagineux 47, 55–61.Google Scholar
Dhileepan, K. & Nampoothiri, K.U.K. (1989) Pollination potential of introduced weevil Elaeidobius kamerunicus in oil palm (Elaeis guinensis Jacq.) plantations. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 59, 517–521.Google Scholar
Genty, P., Garzon, A., Lucchini, F. & Delvare, G. (1986) Oil palm insect pollination in tropical America. Oleagineux 41, 99–112.Google Scholar
Hussein, M.Y. & Rahman, W.H.A. (1991) Life tables of Elaeidobius kamerunicus Faust (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in oil palm. Planter, Kuala Lumpur 67, 3–8.Google Scholar
Hutauruk, C. & Ps, S. (1984) Population build-up of Elaeidobius kamerunicus Fst in several oil palm estates in Indonesia. Buletin Pusat Penelitian Marihat 4 (1), 8–22.Google Scholar
Hutauruk, C., Sipayund, A., Ps, S. & Simangunsong, G. (1984) Population build-up and dispersal of Elaeidobius kamerunicus Fst. in Indonesia. Buletin Pusat Penelitian Marihat 4 (2), 8–29.Google Scholar
Kevan, P.G., Hussein, M.Y., Hussey, N. & Wahid, M.B. (1986) Modelling the use of Elaeidobius kamerunicus for pollination of oil palm. Planter, Kuala Lumpur 62, 89–99.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, R. (1985) Entomological investigations. pp. 40–43in Annual Report for 1984. Honiara, Solomon Islands, Research Department, Agricultural Division.Google Scholar
Mariau, D. & Genty, P. (1988) Contribution de l'IRHO à l'étude des insect pollinisateurs du palmier à huile en Afrique, Amerique du sud et Indonesia. Oleagineux 43, 233–240.Google Scholar
Mariau, D., Houssou, M., Leeoustre, R. & Ndigui, B. (1991) Insectes pollinisateurs de palmier à huile et taux de nouaison en Afrique de l'oeust. Oleagineux 46, 43–51.Google Scholar
PORIM (1984) Proceedings of the symposium on impact of the pollinating weevil on the Malaysian oil palm industry. 376 pp. Kuala Lumpur, Palm Oil Research Institute of Malaysia.Google Scholar
Syed, R.A. (1979) Studies on oil palm pollination by insects. Bulletin of Entomological Research 69, 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syed, R.A. (1981) Insect pollination of oil palm: feasibility of introducing Elaeidobius spp. into Malaysia. Oil Palm News 25, 2–16.Google Scholar
Syed, R.A., Law, I.H. & Corley, R.H.V. (1982) Insect pollination of oil palm: introduction, establishment and pollinating efficiency of Elaeidobius kamerunicus Faust in Malaysia. Planter, Kuala Lumpur 58, 547–561.Google Scholar
Syed, R.A. & Seleh, A. (1987) Population of Elaeidobius kamerunicus Faust in relation to fruitset. Proceedings of the 1987 International Oil Palm/Palm Oil Conferences: Progress and Prospects Module I Agriculture.23–26 June 1987,Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia,528–534.Google Scholar
Taniputra, B., Chairul, M. & Kabul, P. (1989) The impact of Elaeidobius kamerunicus on the yields of Elaeis guineensis in Indonesia. Proceedings 1989 PORIM International Palm Oil Development Conference Module II Agriculture,5–9 September 1989,Malaysia,125–143.Google Scholar
Velayudhan, R., Senrayan, R. & Rajadurai, S. (1988) Parasitoid-host interactions with reference to Anastus ramakrishnae (Mani) (Hymenotera; Eupelmidae) in relation to pentatomid and coreid hosts. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy B54, 145–153.Google Scholar
Wahid, M.B., Masijan, Z., Halim, A.H. & Tayeb, D.M. (1987) The population census and the pollinating efficiency of the weevil Elaeidobius kamerunicus in Malaysia—A status report, 1983–1986. Proceedings of the 1987 International oil palm/palm oil conferences: Progress and Prospects Module I Agriculture.23–26 June 1987,Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia,535–549.Google Scholar
Wood, B.J. (1985) Some consequences of weevil pollination of the oil palm in south east Asia. Planter, Kuala Lumpur 61, 423–438.Google Scholar