Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-l48q4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-22T13:41:33.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structuring power: business and authority beyond the nation state

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Henry Farrell
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA

Abstract

What is the relationship between globalization and the political power of business? Much of the existing literature focuses on the ability of mobile capital to threaten exit in order to press for more business friendly rules. In this article, we refine arguments about exit options in global markets by arguing that the relative exit options available to business and other actors are neither fixed, nor exogenous consequences of some generically conceived process of globalization. Instead, they themselves are the result of struggles between actors with different interests and political opportunities. Since exit options play a crucial role in determining the relative structural power of business vis-à-vis other actors, we dub the power to shape exit options structuring power, distinguishing it from structural power, and argue that it is crucial to explaining it. We identify two channels through which actors can shape exit options – extending jurisdictional reach and reshaping the rules of other jurisdictions – and the factors that will make regulators and business more or less capable of exercising structuring power. We then use two exploratory case studies – one involving privacy regulation, the other accountancy standards – to illustrate how structuring power can work to shape exit options, and thus structural power. We conclude by considering the relationship between structuring power, structural power, and the existing literature in comparative and international political economy.

Type
Research articles
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2015 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahlquist, John S. 2006. “Economic Policy, Institutions, and Capital Flows: Portfolio and Direct Investment Flows in Developing Countries.” International Studies Quarterly 50 (3): 681704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, David M. 1994. “Capital Mobility and State Autonomy: Toward a Structural Theory of International Monetary Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 38 (2): 193218.Google Scholar
Bach, David and Newman, Abraham. 2007. “The European Regulatory State and Global Public Policy: Micro-Institutions, Macro-Influence.” Journal of European Public Policy 14: 827846.Google Scholar
Bell, Stephen. 2012. “The Power of Ideas: The Ideational Shaping of the Structural Power of Business.” International Studies Quarterly 56: 661673.Google Scholar
Bennett, Colin. 1992. Regulating Privacy: Data Protection and Public Policy in Europe and the United States. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Suzanne. 2000. “Globalization and Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 3: 4362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Suzanne, and Dore, Ronald. 1996. National Diversity and Global Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Block, Fred. 1987. Revising State Theory: Essays on Politics and Postindustrialism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Boix, Charles. 1998. Political Parties, Growth an Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Botzem, Sebastian. 2012. The Politics of Accounting Regulation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Callaghan, Helen. 2010. “Beyond Methodological Nationalism: How Multilevel Governance Affects the Clash of Capitalisms.” Journal of European Public Policy 17 (4): 564580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camfferman, Kees, and Zeff, Stephen A. 2007. Financial Reporting and Global Capital Markets: A History of the International Accounting Standards Committee, 1973–2000. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chwieroth, Jeffrey, and Sinclair, Timothy. 2013. “How you stand depends on how we see: International capital mobility as social fact.” Review of International Political Economy 20 (3): 457485.Google Scholar
Culpepper, Pepper D. 2010. Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Culpepper, Pepper D., and Reinke, Raphael. 2014. “Structural Power and Bank Bailouts in the United Kingdom and the United States.” Politics and Society 42 (4): 427454.Google Scholar
Cutler, Claire, Haufler, Virginia, and Porter, Tony. 1999. Private Authority and International Affairs. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel 2001. “Globalization and Policy Convergence.” International Studies Review 3 (Spring): 5378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission, European. 1995. “Accounting Harmonization: A new strategy vis-à-vis international harmonization.” COM (1995)508. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Fairfield, Tasha. 2015. Private Wealth and Public Revenue in Latin America: Business Power and Tax Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, Henry. 2003. “Constructing the International Foundations of E-Commerce: The EU-US Safe Harbor Arrangement.” International Organization 2: 277306.Google Scholar
Farrell, Henry, and Newman, Abraham L. 2014. “Domestic Institutions beyond the Nation-State: Charting the New Interdependence Approach.” World Politics 66 (2): 331363.Google Scholar
Farrell, Henry, and Newman, Abraham L. 2015. “The New Politics of Interdependence Cross-National Layering in Trans-Atlantic Regulatory Disputes.” Comparative Political Studies 48 (4): 497526.Google Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry. 1991. “Invested Interest: The Politics of National Economic Policies in a World of Global Finance.” International Organization 45 (4): 425445.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. “Global Markets and National Politics.” International Organization 52 (4): 787824.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey, and Lange, Peter. 1991. “Political Responses to Interdependence; What's ‘Left’ for the Left?International Organization 45 (4): 539564.Google Scholar
Goodman, John B., and Pauly, Louis W. 1993. “The Obsolescence of Capital Controls?: Economic Management in an Age of Global Markets.” World Politics 46 (1): 5082.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob, and Pierson, Paul. 2002. “Business Power and Social Policy: Employers and the Formation of the American Welfare State,” Politics and Society 30 (2): 277325.Google Scholar
Hays, Jude. 2003. “Globalization and Capital Taxation in Consensus and Majoritarian Democracies,” World Politics 56 (1): 79113.Google Scholar
Hopwood, Anthony G. 1994. “Some Reflections on ‘The Harmonization of Accounting Within the EU’.” European Accounting Review 3 (2): 241254.Google Scholar
Kaczmarek, Sara, and Newman, Abraham. 2011. “The Long Arm of the Law: Extraterritoriality and the National Implementation of Foreign Bribery Legislation.” International Organization 65 (4): 745770.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, Lange, Peter, Marks, Gary, and Stephens, John. 1999. Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kobrin, Stephen. 2001. “Territoriality and the Governance of Cyberspace.” Journal of International Business Studies 32 (4): 687704.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 2009. “Open Economy Politics: A Critical Review.” The Review of International Organizations 4 (3): 219244.Google Scholar
Leblond, Patrick. 2011. “EU, US and International Accounting Standards: A Delicate Balancing Act in Governing Global Finance.” Journal of European Public Policy 18 (3): 443461.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles Edward. 1977. Politics and Markets: The World's Political Economic Systems. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward, Milner, Helen, and Pevehouse, Jon. 2007. “Vetoing Cooperation: The Impact of Veto Players and Preferential Trade Agreements.” British Journal of Political Science 37 (3): 403432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosley, Layna. 2000. “Room to Move: International Financial Markets and National Welfare States.” International Organization 54 (4): 737773.Google Scholar
Mugge, Daniel. 2011. “The European Presence in Global Financial Governance: A Principal-Agent Perspective.” Journal of European Public Policy 18 (3): 383402.Google Scholar
Newman, Abraham. 2008. Protectors of Privacy: Regulating Personal Data in the Global Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Newman, Abraham, and Posner, Elliot. 2011. “International Interdependence and Regulatory Power: Authority, Mobility, and Markets.” European Journal of International Relations 17 (4): 589610.Google Scholar
Nölke, Andreas, and Perry, James. 2007. “The Power of Transnational Private Governance: Financialization and the IASB.” Business and Politics 9 (3). Accessed June 16, 2015. http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/bap.2008.9.3/bap.2008.9.3.1185/bap.2008.9.3.1185.xml.Google Scholar
Oatley, Thomas. 2011. “The Reductionist Gamble: Open Economy Politics in the Global Economy.” International Organization 65 (2): 311341.Google Scholar
Perry, James, and Nöelke, Andreas. 2005. “International Accounting Standard Setting: A Network Approach.” Business and Politics 7 (3). doi:10.2202/1469-3569.1136.Google Scholar
Perry, James, and Nolke, Andreas. 2006. “The Political Economy of International Accounting Standards.” Review of International Political Economy 13 (4): 559586.Google Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas, and Raess, Damian. 2012. “How (and Why) Is this Time Different? The Politics of Economic Crisis in Western Europe and the United States.” Annual Review of Political Science 15: 1333.Google Scholar
Posner, Elliot. 2010. “Sequence as Explanation: the International Politics of Accounting Standards.” Review of International Political Economy 17 (4): 639664.Google Scholar
Posner, Elliot, and Véron, Nicolas. 2010. “The EU and Financial Regulation: Power Without Purpose?.” Journal of European Public Policy 17 (3): 400415.Google Scholar
Quaglia, Lucia. 2014. “The European Union, the USA and International Standard Setting by Regulatory Fora in Finance.” New Political Economy 19 (3): 427444.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal. 2009. Does the Constitution Follow the Flag? The Evolution of Territoriality in American Law. USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2011. “The Future of Economic Convergence.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series no. 17400. http://www.nber.org/papers/w17400.Google Scholar
Rudra, Nita. 2008. Globalization and the Race to the Bottom in Developing Countries: Who Really Gets Hurt? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Ann-Marie. 2004. The New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Strang, Susan. 1988. States and Markets. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Strange, Susan. 1996. The Retreat of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suarez, Sandra, and Kolodny, Robin. 2011. “Paving the Road to ‘Too Big to Fail’: Business Interests and the Politics of Financial Deregulation in the United States.” Politics and Society 39 (1): 74102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonelson, Alan. 2000. The Race to the Bottom: Why a Worldwide Worker Surplus and Uncontrolled Free Trade are Sinking American Living Standards. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Veron, Nicolas. 2007. The Global Accounting Experiment. Brussels: Bruegel.Google Scholar
Vitols, Sigurt. 2001. “Varieties of Corporate Governance: Comparing Germany and the UK.” In Varieties of Capitalism, edited by Hall, Peter A., and Soskice, David W. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 1989. Fluctuating Fortune: The Political Power of Business in America. Beard Books.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 1995. Trading Up. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Woll, Cornelia. 2008. Firm Interests: How Governments Shape Business Lobbying. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Woll, Cornelia. 2014. The Power of Inaction: Bank Bailouts in Comparison. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar